From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Ron Rindjunsky" <ron.rindjunsky@intel.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwlwifi and tx info in skb->cb
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 01:07:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240805081507j7cf991ffo5bae443b0b77a39e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210255522.3547.48.camel@johannes.berg>
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>
> > > > This is for scatter gather. Nothing to do with aggregation. If you get
> > > > fragmented frame you can send it out without linearizing in CPU. in
> > > > numer of TB - TX buffers (which is limitted bu MAX_NUM_OF_TBS) But
> > > > I'm just over ever explaining :)
> > >
> > > We don't support that in mac80211 right now, why do you have that there?
> >
> > Currently we actively use 2 of them. First for TX command second for
> > actual frame. It would be even worth if we need to expand
> > each packet also for TX command.
>
> We will no longer do that after davem and I figure out those allocation
> patches.
Not sure these things are connected. TX command is allocated fixed for each TFD.
> You should implement TCP checksumming in the hardware. *that* would help
> a lot.
There is already pretty much deal of link layer in software to reduce
the cost and the complexity of the HW for these softmac NICs so
this would be kind of strange investment...but I didn't invest much
thoughts into yet.
There are probably other means to utilize scatter gather DMA then TCP
off loading. Are they any other source of scattered packets maybe
iovec?
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 22:01 iwlwifi and tx info in skb->cb Johannes Berg
2008-05-07 23:29 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-07 23:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 0:21 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-08 14:05 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 22:07 ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2008-05-08 22:10 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 22:28 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-08 22:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 23:16 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-08 23:17 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 23:20 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 23:20 ` David Miller
2008-05-08 23:30 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ba2fa240805081507j7cf991ffo5bae443b0b77a39e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ron.rindjunsky@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox