From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Ron Rindjunsky" <ron.rindjunsky@intel.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwlwifi and tx info in skb->cb
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 01:28:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240805081528t45d7810cjfd553bf99daff096@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210284656.3547.76.camel@johannes.berg>
> Ah, no, I misread that. Well, I think it might still help to say you
> need N bytes headroom and use those since you wouldn't have to allocate
> an extra skb.
There actually might be a benefit in doing this but it is quite a
change in design which means not now.
>
> > > You should implement TCP checksumming in the hardware. *that* would help
> > > a lot.
> >
> > There is already pretty much deal of link layer in software to reduce
> > the cost and the complexity of the HW for these softmac NICs so
> > this would be kind of strange investment...but I didn't invest much
> > thoughts into yet.
> > There are probably other means to utilize scatter gather DMA then TCP
> > off loading. Are they any other source of scattered packets maybe
> > iovec?
>
> Well as far as I know those too would be zero-copy IO which only works
> if you have TCP checksumming in hardware.
I've just scanned the thread that was explaining why is this necessary
I will read it more carefully... I have just feeling that all this
wlan stuff just fits very awkwardly into current networking stack.
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 22:01 iwlwifi and tx info in skb->cb Johannes Berg
2008-05-07 23:29 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-07 23:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 0:21 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-08 14:05 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 22:07 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-08 22:10 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 22:28 ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2008-05-08 22:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 23:16 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-08 23:17 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 23:20 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-08 23:20 ` David Miller
2008-05-08 23:30 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ba2fa240805081528t45d7810cjfd553bf99daff096@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ron.rindjunsky@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox