From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: add spectrum capabilities
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:17:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240806180917i320fac4bxcfd7416349850bff@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213803431.1312.24.camel@johannes.berg>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:53 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> This patch add spectrum capability and required information
>> elements to association request providing AP has requested it and
>> it is supported by the driver
>
> Why bother splitting this up into two patches, the Kconfig option isn't
> even being used?
It will be.
>> + if ((bss->capability & WLAN_CAPABILITY_SPECTRUM_MGMT) &&
>> + (local->hw.flags & IEEE80211_HW_SPECTRUM_MGMT))
>> + capab |= WLAN_CAPABILITY_SPECTRUM_MGMT;
>
> Why do we need a hardware capability flag for this? The only thing you
> seem to be doing with it is determine whether to send the power
> capability IE?
> Will you follow up with more patches to enable radar detection and
> things like that, and shouldn't we merge that as one series? This looks
> sane enough, but it seems hard to judge whether or not it's actually the
> best way to do things.
>
> What else will depend on the hw capability flag?
>
We need driver support mainly for quiet period and channel
switch.(patches will follow)
Not sure how the precise timing will be handled in mac80211. So we
don't advertise spectrum capability to AP if we cannot handle 11h
actions.
Don't mind that this will be applied as series. Just sending this out
to get some feedback on the way maybe I should mark them as RFCs
Thanks for review
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-18 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-18 14:53 [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: add MAC80211_VERBOSE_SPECT_MGMT_DEBUG Kconfig option Tomas Winkler
2008-06-18 14:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: add spectrum capabilities Tomas Winkler
2008-06-18 15:37 ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-18 16:17 ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2008-06-18 17:23 ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-18 21:11 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-18 21:17 ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-18 21:58 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ba2fa240806180917i320fac4bxcfd7416349850bff@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox