From: Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Igor Mitsyanko <igor.mitsyanko.os@quantenna.com>,
Avinash Patil <avinashp@quantenna.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] qtnfmac: abort scans on wireless interface changes
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:16:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170918101654.5zukak72wvmpm6pp@bars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505728987.13691.2.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:03:07PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > - if (timer_pending(&mac->scan_timeout))
> > > > - del_timer_sync(&mac->scan_timeout);
> > > > qtnf_scan_done(mac, le32_to_cpu(status->flags) &
> > > > QLINK_SCAN_ABORTED);
> > >
> > > and that's related perhaps but not really explained in the
> > > changelog,
> > > not sure?
> >
> > That was minor optimization: to remove pedning timer whenever scan
> > is canceled. Sure, it worth mentioning in changelog, will do.
>
> I realized (after sending my email) that it actually made a lot of
> sense, so yeah - and in fact I'm not sure it's just an optimisation,
> depends on where else you cancel the timer and if that could leave the
> timer running until after the interface is removed or something.
>
> Btw, I don't really see why you check pending first?
I don't quite understand the question. Do you mean it makes sense to call
cfg80211_scan_done first and then cancel timer ?
> > By the way, is it ok to send corrected single patch in reply to this
> > discussion ? Or the appropriate way is to resend the whole patch set
> > ?
>
> Good question. I think it's up to the specific maintainer, I know davem
> wants a full resend, but Kalle might have his own preference. I for one
> am willing to deal with both, though a full resend is somewhat easier.
Ok, understood.
Regards,
Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-18 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-18 8:04 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] qtnfmac: misc fixes intended for 4.14 Sergey Matyukevich
2017-09-18 8:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] qtnfmac: lock access to h/w in tx path Sergey Matyukevich
2017-09-18 8:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] qtnfmac: abort scans on wireless interface changes Sergey Matyukevich
2017-09-18 8:41 ` Johannes Berg
2017-09-18 9:57 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2017-09-18 10:03 ` Johannes Berg
2017-09-18 10:16 ` Sergey Matyukevich [this message]
2017-09-18 10:20 ` Johannes Berg
2017-09-18 10:31 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2017-09-18 12:51 ` Kalle Valo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-09-15 11:52 [PATCH 0/2] qtnfmac: misc fixes intended for 4.14 Sergey Matyukevich
2017-09-15 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] qtnfmac: abort scans on wireless interface changes Sergey Matyukevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170918101654.5zukak72wvmpm6pp@bars \
--to=sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com \
--cc=avinashp@quantenna.com \
--cc=igor.mitsyanko.os@quantenna.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox