From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
To: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: validate HT/VHT capability and operation IE lengths
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:34:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715163458.GA149147@francesco-nb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715162800.1922-1-doruk@0sec.ai>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 06:28:00PM +0200, Doruk Tan Ozturk wrote:
> > why break and not return -EINVAL? (this in general, not only on this
> > specific one).
>
> To skip the one malformed optional element and keep parsing the rest of the
> beacon, like the FH/DS/CF/IBSS cases just above in the same loop. Happy to
> switch to -EINVAL if you'd rather reject the whole BSS.
maybe I am missing something, but I see return -EINVAL; when the packet
is malformed. see for example
case WLAN_EID_VENDOR_SPECIFIC:
vendor_ie = (struct ieee_types_vendor_specific *)
current_ptr;
/* 802.11 requires at least 3-byte OUI. */
if (element_len < sizeof(vendor_ie->vend_hdr.oui.oui))
return -EINVAL;
My advise would be to do the same we are already doing, and unless I am
wrong, it means that we skip the whole frame if a corruption is
detected.
Francesco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 10:08 [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: validate HT/VHT capability and operation IE lengths Doruk Tan Ozturk
2026-07-15 14:40 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-07-15 16:28 ` Doruk Tan Ozturk
2026-07-15 16:34 ` Francesco Dolcini [this message]
2026-07-15 18:33 ` Doruk Tan Ozturk
2026-07-15 18:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Doruk Tan Ozturk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715163458.GA149147@francesco-nb \
--to=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=doruk@0sec.ai \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox