From: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@gmail.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Carl Huang <cjhuang@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath11k: acquire ab->base_lock in unassign when finding the peer by addr
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:51:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <306b8f3c-55ff-24a3-1f7f-31c0b9e247fc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zgljmvne.fsf@kernel.org>
On 21/03/2022 11:45, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ath11k_peer_find_by_addr states via lockdep that ab->base_lock must be
>> held when calling that function in order to protect the list. All
>> callers except ath11k_mac_op_unassign_vif_chanctx have that lock
>> acquired when calling ath11k_peer_find_by_addr. That lock is also not
>> transitively held by a path towards ath11k_mac_op_unassign_vif_chanctx.
>> The solution is to acquire the lock when calling
>> ath11k_peer_find_by_addr inside ath11k_mac_op_unassign_vif_chanctx.
>>
>> Fixes: 701e48a43e15 ("ath11k: add packet log support for QCA6390")
>> Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
>> index 07f499d5ec92..5db2333478a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
>> @@ -7077,9 +7077,15 @@ ath11k_mac_op_unassign_vif_chanctx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>> WARN_ON(!arvif->is_started);
>>
>> if (ab->hw_params.vdev_start_delay &&
>> - arvif->vdev_type == WMI_VDEV_TYPE_MONITOR &&
>> - ath11k_peer_find_by_addr(ab, ar->mac_addr))
>> - ath11k_peer_delete(ar, arvif->vdev_id, ar->mac_addr);
>> + arvif->vdev_type == WMI_VDEV_TYPE_MONITOR) {
>> + struct ath11k_peer *peer;
>
> In the pending branch I moved the declaration to the beginning of the
> function and added this to the commit log:
>
> "I am currently working on a static analyser to detect missing locks and
> this was a reported case. I manually verified the report by looking at
> the code, but I do not have real hardware so this is compile tested
> only."
>
Sounds good to me. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 21:52 [PATCH] ath11k: acquire ab->base_lock in unassign when finding the peer by addr Niels Dossche
2022-03-16 6:13 ` Kalle Valo
2022-03-16 10:43 ` Niels Dossche
2022-03-16 14:34 ` Kalle Valo
2022-03-16 14:38 ` Niels Dossche
2022-03-21 10:45 ` Kalle Valo
2022-03-21 11:51 ` Niels Dossche [this message]
2022-03-23 8:52 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=306b8f3c-55ff-24a3-1f7f-31c0b9e247fc@gmail.com \
--to=dossche.niels@gmail.com \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=cjhuang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox