From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ath: advance ath.ko with one more helper
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:27:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43e72e890908121027x5211c7cja3185861bc9c02f1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6c5339f0908121021x3bc9fe26vb17532de6c464b7f@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Bob Copeland<me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Luis R.
> Rodriguez<lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
>> This adds a common structure where we can start stuffing shared items
>> and introduces a helper for both ath5k and ath9k's use.
>>
>> Luis R. Rodriguez (3):
>> ath: add common ath_rxbuf_alloc() and make ath9k use it
>> ath5k: use common ath.ko ath_rxbuf_alloc()
>> ath5k: use bit shift operators for cache line size
>
> Series looks OK to me but I think we can add a 4/4 that would:
>
> - include ath/reg.h [don't remember if that's the name right now]
> in ath.h
> - move reg structs into ath_common (although, this could be a
> bad call for ar9170, haven't really checked).
>
> Then we only have to deal with one header and one composite struct
> (for now) as the interface between the modules.
Sure, I was thinking of doing this after this. Is that acceptable?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-12 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-12 16:56 [PATCH 0/3] ath: advance ath.ko with one more helper Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-12 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath: add common ath_rxbuf_alloc() and make ath9k use it Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-12 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath5k: use common ath.ko ath_rxbuf_alloc() Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-12 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath5k: use bit shift operators for cache line size Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-12 17:13 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-12 17:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-12 17:50 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-12 17:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] ath: advance ath.ko with one more helper Bob Copeland
2009-08-12 17:27 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2009-08-13 2:13 ` [ath5k-devel] " Nick Kossifidis
2009-08-13 2:59 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-13 3:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-13 14:41 ` Nick Kossifidis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43e72e890908121027x5211c7cja3185861bc9c02f1@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox