From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v2] nl80211: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:04:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e17c585-bd42-8c65-a37a-add6aa4d5ca4@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b8c44c3ecb8626d9bb5a8f786b1d2b7488df86b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 6/28/19 7:57 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 21:34 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 6/26/19 9:25 PM, Jiunn Chang wrote:
>>> Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most
>>> significant bit to unsigned.
>>>
>>> Changes included in v2:
>>> - use subsystem specific subject lines
>>> - CC required mailing lists
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Move version change lines here. They don't belong in the commit log.
>
> FWIW, in many cases people (maintainers) now *do* want them in the
> commit log. Here, they're just editorial, so agree, but if real
> technical changes were made due to reviews, they can indeed be useful.
>
> johannes
>
I went looking in the git log. Looks like there are several commits with
"Changes since" included in the commit log. It still appears to be
maintainer preference. Probably from networking and networking related
areas - wireless being one of them. This trend is recent it appears in
any case.
There is a value to seeing changes as the work evolves. However, there
is the concern that how log should it be.
This example commit has history from RFC stage and no doubt very useful
since this is a new driver.
8ef988b914bd449458eb2174febb67b0f137b33c
If we make this more of a norm, we do want to make sure, we evolve
from informal nature of these "Changes since", to "Commit log" text.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-28 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190627010137.5612-4-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
2019-06-27 3:25 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v2] nl80211: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift Jiunn Chang
2019-06-27 3:34 ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-28 13:57 ` Johannes Berg
2019-06-28 15:04 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2019-06-28 15:17 ` Johannes Berg
2019-06-28 15:27 ` Shuah Khan
2019-07-04 18:34 ` Jiunn Chang
2019-07-04 20:20 ` Johannes Berg
2019-06-27 5:04 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3] " Jiunn Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e17c585-bd42-8c65-a37a-add6aa4d5ca4@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=c0d1n61at3@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox