From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
"Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com" <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>,
"kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:25:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3ca010a-3c1a-5c64-a58a-a66d31f5869b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cfea9eaf08446d5a7dfcb85da34dcf2@realtek.com>
On 2022/12/8 8:38, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 10:38 PM
>> To: Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com; kvalo@kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
>>
>> It is not allowed to call consume_skb() from hardware interrupt context
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ kfree_skb()?
> because this patch is to replace dev_kfree_skb().
>
>> or with interrupts being disabled. So replace dev_kfree_skb() with
>> dev_consume_skb_irq() under spin_lock_irqsave(). Compile tested only.
>>
>> Fixes: 26f1fad29ad9 ("New driver: rtl8xxxu (mac80211)")
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> index ac641a56efb0..d0600af5bef4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> @@ -5274,7 +5274,7 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_queue_rx_urb(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv,
>> pending = priv->rx_urb_pending_count;
>> } else {
>> skb = (struct sk_buff *)rx_urb->urb.context;
>> - dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>> + dev_consume_skb_irq(skb);
> Why not dev_kfree_skb_irq() instead? any reason?
#define dev_kfree_skb(a) consume_skb(a)
dev_kfree_skb() is consume_skb(), so use dev_consume_skb_irq() instead.
static inline void dev_kfree_skb_irq(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
__dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb, SKB_REASON_DROPPED);
}
static inline void dev_consume_skb_irq(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
__dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb, SKB_REASON_CONSUMED);
}
They have different free reasons.
Thanks,
Yang
>
>> usb_free_urb(&rx_urb->urb);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
>> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 14:37 [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave() Yang Yingliang
2022-12-08 0:38 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2022-12-08 1:25 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
2022-12-08 1:41 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2022-12-08 1:58 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-12-08 13:19 ` Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3ca010a-3c1a-5c64-a58a-a66d31f5869b@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox