From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
To: <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<amitkarwar@gmail.com>, <ganapathi017@gmail.com>,
<sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com>, <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: wireless: marvell: mwifiex: fix sleep in atomic context bugs
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 09:08:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec16c0b5-b8c7-3bd1-e733-f054ec3c2cd1@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e778cb1.22654.180decbcb8e.Coremail.duoming@zju.edu.cn>
On 5/19/2022 5:08 PM, duoming@zju.edu.cn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 08:48:44 -0700 Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>>>>> There are sleep in atomic context bugs when uploading device dump
>>>>> data on usb interface. The root cause is that the operations that
>>>>> may sleep are called in fw_dump_timer_fn which is a timer handler.
>>>>> The call tree shows the execution paths that could lead to bugs:
>>>>>
>>>>> (Interrupt context)
>>>>> fw_dump_timer_fn
>>>>> mwifiex_upload_device_dump
>>>>> dev_coredumpv(..., GFP_KERNEL)
>>
>> just looking at this description, why isn't the simple fix just to
>> change this call to use GFP_ATOMIC?
>
> Because change the parameter of dev_coredumpv() to GFP_ATOMIC could only solve
> partial problem. The following GFP_KERNEL parameters are in /lib/kobject.c
> which is not influenced by dev_coredumpv().
>
> kobject_set_name_vargs
> kvasprintf_const(GFP_KERNEL, ...); //may sleep
> kstrdup(s, GFP_KERNEL); //may sleep
Then it seems there is a problem with dev_coredumpm().
dev_coredumpm() takes a gfp param which means it expects to be called in
any context, but it then calls dev_set_name() which, as you point out,
cannot be called from an atomic context.
So if we cannot change the fact that dev_set_name() cannot be called
from an atomic context, then it would seem to follow that
dev_coredumpv()/dev_coredumpm() also cannot be called from an atomic
context and hence their gfp param is pointless and should presumably be
removed.
/jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 13:53 [PATCH net v2] net: wireless: marvell: mwifiex: fix sleep in atomic context bugs Duoming Zhou
2022-05-19 14:58 ` Kalle Valo
2022-05-19 15:14 ` duoming
2022-05-19 15:48 ` Jeff Johnson
2022-05-20 0:08 ` duoming
2022-05-20 16:08 ` Jeff Johnson [this message]
2022-05-21 3:21 ` duoming
2022-05-21 6:32 ` Kalle Valo
2022-05-21 13:59 ` duoming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec16c0b5-b8c7-3bd1-e733-f054ec3c2cd1@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
--cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duoming@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ganapathi017@gmail.com \
--cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox