Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH 14/41] rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173341.28463.11122.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

The macros are the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb.
So it might be better to move the entire define set into rt2800lib.h

If you haven't done so already in a subsequent patch, please fix it,
otherwise:

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

Ivo


> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c |   12 ++++++------
>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h |    8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> @@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(nohwcrypt, "Disable har
>   * The _lock versions must be used if you already hold the csr_mutex
>   */
>  #define WAIT_FOR_BBP(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), BBP_CSR_CFG, BBP_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), BBP_CSR_CFG, BBP_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
>  #define WAIT_FOR_RFCSR(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG, RF_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG, RF_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
>  #define WAIT_FOR_RF(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG0, RF_CSR_CFG0_BUSY, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG0, RF_CSR_CFG0_BUSY, (__reg))
>  #define WAIT_FOR_MCU(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), H2M_MAILBOX_CSR, \
> -			       H2M_MAILBOX_CSR_OWNER, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), H2M_MAILBOX_CSR, \
> +			    H2M_MAILBOX_CSR_OWNER, (__reg))
>  
>  static void rt2800pci_bbp_write(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>  				const unsigned int word, const u8 value)
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void rt2800pci_efuse_read(struct 
>  	rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, reg);
>  
>  	/* Wait until the EEPROM has been loaded */
> -	rt2x00pci_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, EFUSE_CTRL_KICK, &reg);
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, EFUSE_CTRL_KICK, &reg);
>  
>  	/* Apparently the data is read from end to start */
>  	rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA3,
> Index: b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,14 @@ static inline void rt2800_register_multi
>  	rt2x00pci_register_multiwrite(rt2x00dev, offset, value, length);
>  }
>  
> +static inline int rt2800_regbusy_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
> +				      const unsigned int offset,
> +				      const struct rt2x00_field32 field,
> +				      u32 *reg)
> +{
> +	return rt2x00pci_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, offset, field, reg);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * RF chip defines.
>   *
> 



^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 13/41] rt2800usb: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173334.28463.13649.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

The macros are the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb.
So it might be better to move the entire define set into rt2800lib.h

If you haven't done so already in a subsequent patch, please fix it,
otherwise:

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

Ivo

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c |   10 +++++-----
>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h |    8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c
> @@ -58,14 +58,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(nohwcrypt, "Disable har
>   * The _lock versions must be used if you already hold the csr_mutex
>   */
>  #define WAIT_FOR_BBP(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00usb_regbusy_read((__dev), BBP_CSR_CFG, BBP_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), BBP_CSR_CFG, BBP_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
>  #define WAIT_FOR_RFCSR(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00usb_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG, RF_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG, RF_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
>  #define WAIT_FOR_RF(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00usb_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG0, RF_CSR_CFG0_BUSY, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG0, RF_CSR_CFG0_BUSY, (__reg))
>  #define WAIT_FOR_MCU(__dev, __reg) \
> -	rt2x00usb_regbusy_read((__dev), H2M_MAILBOX_CSR, \
> -			       H2M_MAILBOX_CSR_OWNER, (__reg))
> +	rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), H2M_MAILBOX_CSR, \
> +			    H2M_MAILBOX_CSR_OWNER, (__reg))
>  
>  static void rt2800usb_bbp_write(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>  				const unsigned int word, const u8 value)
> Index: b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,14 @@ static inline void rt2x00_register_multi
>  	rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite(rt2x00dev, offset, value, length);
>  }
>  
> +static inline int rt2800_regbusy_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
> +				      const unsigned int offset,
> +				      struct rt2x00_field32 field,
> +				      u32 *reg)
> +{
> +	return rt2x00usb_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, offset, field, reg);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * RF chip defines.
>   *
> 



^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 15/41] rt2800usb: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173350.28463.25405.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 16/41] rt2800pci: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173357.28463.50170.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800pci: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 17/41] rt2800usb: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173404.28463.65125.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 18/41] rt2800pci: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173411.28463.16599.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800pci: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 19/41] rt2800usb: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173418.28463.79825.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 20/41] rt2800pci: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173425.28463.74288.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800pci: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 21/41] rt2800usb: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173432.28463.51210.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>



^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 22/41] rt2800pci: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173439.28463.20951.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800pci: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 23/41] rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173446.28463.62662.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev
> 
> Enhance rt2x00 infrastructure by adding driver specific field to
> struct rt2x00_dev.
> 
> The new field will be used by rt2800 drivers for chipset registers
> access abstraction layer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 24/41] rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173453.28463.94062.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
> 
> Add chipset registers access abstraction layer and prepare for later
> code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 23/41] rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <200911051952.51189.IvDoorn@gmail.com>

On Thursday 05 November 2009, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev
> > 
> > Enhance rt2x00 infrastructure by adding driver specific field to
> > struct rt2x00_dev.
> > 
> > The new field will be used by rt2800 drivers for chipset registers
> > access abstraction layer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

Sorry I have a better idea, please the pointer into struct rt2x00_ops,
that way you can assign it statically like the rest of that structure.
That makes actually sense since all other function ops structures
are assigned like that as well.

Ivo

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 24/41] rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <200911051953.47346.IvDoorn@gmail.com>

On Thursday 05 November 2009, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
> > 
> > Add chipset registers access abstraction layer and prepare for later
> > code unification.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
> 

See comment on patch [23/41]

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 25/41] rt2800pci: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173500.28463.89800.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800pci: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
> 
> Add chipset registers access abstraction layer and prepare for later
> code unification.

See comment on patch [23/41]

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 26/41] rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() arguments
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173510.28463.24779.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() arguments
> 
> Add const to 'value' argument of rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite()
> (all arguments match rt2x00pci_register_multiwrite() ones now).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 27/41] rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_regbusy_read() arguments
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173518.28463.61728.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_regbusy_read() arguments
> 
> Add const to 'field' argument of rt2x00usb_regbusy_read()
> (all arguments match rt2x00pci_regbusy_read() ones now).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 28/41] rt2x00: fix rt2x00pci_register_multi[read,write]() arguments
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173525.28463.40807.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: fix rt2x00pci_register_multi[read,write]() arguments
> 
> Change type of 'length' argument from u16 to u32 (all arguments
> match rt2x00usb_register_multi[read,write]() ones now).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>



^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 29/41] rt2800: add rt2800lib.h
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173532.28463.33083.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: add rt2800lib.h
> 
> Code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 30/41] rt2800usb: fix comments in rt2800usb.h
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173539.28463.82770.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: fix comments in rt2800usb.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 31/41] rt2800usb: add RXINFO_DESC_SIZE definition
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173547.28463.36376.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800usb: add RXINFO_DESC_SIZE definition
> 
> Add RXINFO_DESC_SIZE definition and use it instead of abusing
> RXD_DESC_SIZE one (TXD_DESC_SIZE and RXD_DESC_SIZE are specific
> to PCI version of the chipset).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 32/41] rt2800: fix duplication in header files
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173554.28463.72619.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: fix duplication in header files
> 
> Updated debugging scripts are located here:
> 
> 	http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bart/rt2800/scripts/
> 
> (they also work fine with older drivers)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 33/41] rt2800: fix comments in rt2800.h
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173602.28463.31521.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: fix comments in rt2800.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 34/41] rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173610.28463.4270.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces
> 
> Enhance rt2x00 infrastructure by adding explicit information
> about used chipset interface to struct rt2x00_chip.
> 
> The new field will be used by rt2800 drivers for rt2800 library.
> 
> Also add commonly used rt2x00_intf_is_pci() and rt2x00_intf_is_usb()
> helpers to make code easier to read (noticed by Ivo van Doorn).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply

* Re: [PATCH 35/41] rt2800: prepare for rt2800lib addition
From: Ivo van Doorn @ 2009-11-05 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  Cc: linux-wireless, Gertjan van Wingerde, linux-kernel,
	John W. Linville
In-Reply-To: <20091104173617.28463.6733.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: prepare for rt2800lib addition
> 
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>




^ permalink raw reply


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox