From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Phoebe Buckheister <phoebe.buckheister@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC bluetooth-next 0/4] ieee802154: add support for phy capabilities
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:35:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150410083500.GA709@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55274B1A.2050900@gmail.com>
Hi Varka,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 09:31:30AM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
>
> I think better interface would be get_tx_power() for returning the current power setting
No, we have already such functionality to get the current tx power and
the 802.15.4 standard describes this as part of the pib. [0] 802.15.4
describes this as integer and I hope s8 is enough as range. But this is
funny then, because transceivers allow also floating point dbm values :-)
That 802.15.4 describes this as integer we should use a int (s8) as well here,
that was a open question in my other mails.
This pib attribute should be also set if set_tx_power was successful
afterwards with the values which was set.
> and tx_power_supported() to get the all the available power levels.
>
Yes we talking about the capabilities here only:
The general question about this capability is:
1. Does this interface will report all power levels for all page/channel?
or
2. Does this interface will report all power levels for current
page/channel setting only?
The second one is much easier to implement. But this is a question
which should be answered before.
If you asking yourself "which tx_powers for each ch/page?" This is not
available for 2.4 Ghz transceivers, but transceivers like the
at86rf212 which operates in 700/800/900Mhz have different tx power
settings according the channel/page setting.
The subquestion is here more how we should implement it. Current
solutions are:
1. Create a big array with some mask and set the bit about some
tx_power range and do some mask |= BIT(SUPP_5DBM). But this will
restrict the available setting of dbm levels.
2. The second idea was do use a "context based iteration of available
tx power settings". Netlink can do this quite well with nested
attributes. Calltrace would look like:
nla_nest_start
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr #1 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr #2 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr #3 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
....
....
....
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr last. Must return 1 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
/* indicated because rdev_get_tx_pwr returned 1 */
nla_nest_end
If you tell me you want "tx_power_supported()", please give me more
details how this interface will be look like.
- Alex
[0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/net/cfg802154.h#L78
[1] http://www.atmel.com/images/doc8168.pdf page 107
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-10 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 11:18 [RFC bluetooth-next 0/4] ieee802154: add support for phy capabilities Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 1/4] ieee802154: introduce wpan_phy_supported struct Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 6:17 ` Varka Bhadram
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 2/4] ieee802154: move channels supported out of softmac Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 3/4] ieee802154: add several phy supported handling Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 14:16 ` Alexander Aring
[not found] ` <55261AB2.6050500@gmail.com>
2015-04-09 10:14 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 4/4] at86rf230: set cca_modes supported flags Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 6:32 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 0/4] ieee802154: add support for phy capabilities Varka Bhadram
2015-04-09 9:28 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 9:37 ` Varka Bhadram
2015-04-09 11:37 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 12:33 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-10 4:01 ` Varka Bhadram
2015-04-10 8:35 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2015-04-11 12:04 ` Guido Günther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150410083500.GA709@omega \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phoebe.buckheister@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=varkabhadram@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox