* Reversed Payload Bits?
@ 2016-04-03 18:35 Remi Philippe
2016-04-04 8:04 ` Alexander Aring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Remi Philippe @ 2016-04-03 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wpan
Hello,
A generic question, have you ever run into issues such as payload bits
arriving reversed (AT86RF215 to CC1200 on Contiki, but I guess it
would be the same for AT86RF230)?
At first look it could have been and endianess problem, but I don't see why...
Thanks,
Remi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Reversed Payload Bits?
2016-04-03 18:35 Reversed Payload Bits? Remi Philippe
@ 2016-04-04 8:04 ` Alexander Aring
2016-04-05 12:20 ` Remi Philippe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Aring @ 2016-04-04 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Remi Philippe; +Cc: linux-wpan
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:35:29PM +0400, Remi Philippe wrote:
> Hello,
> A generic question, have you ever run into issues such as payload bits
> arriving reversed (AT86RF215 to CC1200 on Contiki, but I guess it
> would be the same for AT86RF230)?
>
- which layer? MAC, 6LoWPAN?
- bit or byte ordering?
If you code something and missed byteordering handling you can check it
with:
make C=2 net/ieee802154/ net/mac802154/
this requires the software "sparse".
_But_ this works only if you use correct the byteorder typedefs such as
"__le16", etc...
> At first look it could have been and endianess problem, but I don't see why...
>
Which contiki version? I tested 2.6 with some self ported board only.
I know versions below had some fragmentation issues, which you not use.
- Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Reversed Payload Bits?
2016-04-04 8:04 ` Alexander Aring
@ 2016-04-05 12:20 ` Remi Philippe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Remi Philippe @ 2016-04-05 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Aring; +Cc: linux-wpan
Thanks Alex, will look into your suggestion. It seems it's a bit reversal issue.
Contiki is 3.0 (master)
I just noticed that we were playing with the RPi version which doesn't
integrate most of the patches of bluetooth-next. Will first try to
create a diff between RPi and 802154 related to see if it fixes the
issue.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:35:29PM +0400, Remi Philippe wrote:
>> Hello,
>> A generic question, have you ever run into issues such as payload bits
>> arriving reversed (AT86RF215 to CC1200 on Contiki, but I guess it
>> would be the same for AT86RF230)?
>>
>
> - which layer? MAC, 6LoWPAN?
>
> - bit or byte ordering?
>
>
> If you code something and missed byteordering handling you can check it
> with:
>
> make C=2 net/ieee802154/ net/mac802154/
>
> this requires the software "sparse".
>
> _But_ this works only if you use correct the byteorder typedefs such as
> "__le16", etc...
>
>> At first look it could have been and endianess problem, but I don't see why...
>>
>
> Which contiki version? I tested 2.6 with some self ported board only.
> I know versions below had some fragmentation issues, which you not use.
>
> - Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-05 12:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-03 18:35 Reversed Payload Bits? Remi Philippe
2016-04-04 8:04 ` Alexander Aring
2016-04-05 12:20 ` Remi Philippe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox