From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
To: web+oss@zopieux.com, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Aring <aar@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:05:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E69AFD.7010604@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457633643-12535-2-git-send-email-web+oss@zopieux.com>
Hello.
On 10/03/16 19:14, web+oss@zopieux.com wrote:
> From: Alexandre Macabies <web+oss@zopieux.com>
>
> When receiving a security-enabled IEEE 802.15.4 frame, the MRF24J40
> triggers a SECIF interrupt that needs to be handled for RX processing
> to keep functioning properly.
>
> This patch enables the SECIF interrupt and makes the MRF ignores all
> hardware processing of security-enabled frames, that is handled by the
> ieee802154 stack instead.
Missing SOB again.
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aar@pengutronix.de>
> Reported-by: Alexandre Macabies <web+oss@zopieux.com>
> Tested-by: Alexandre Macabies <web+oss@zopieux.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c
> index 764a2bd..96814cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c
> @@ -85,10 +85,12 @@
> #define REG_INTSTAT 0x31 /* Interrupt Status */
> #define BIT_TXNIF BIT(0)
> #define BIT_RXIF BIT(3)
> +#define BIT_SECIF BIT(4)
>
> #define REG_INTCON 0x32 /* Interrupt Control */
> #define BIT_TXNIE BIT(0)
> #define BIT_RXIE BIT(3)
> +#define BIT_SECIE BIT(4)
>
> #define REG_GPIO 0x33 /* GPIO */
> #define REG_TRISGPIO 0x34 /* GPIO direction */
> @@ -616,7 +618,7 @@ static int mrf24j40_start(struct ieee802154_hw *hw)
>
> /* Clear TXNIE and RXIE. Enable interrupts */
> return regmap_update_bits(devrec->regmap_short, REG_INTCON,
> - BIT_TXNIE | BIT_RXIE, 0);
> + BIT_TXNIE | BIT_RXIE | BIT_SECIE, 0);
> }
>
> static void mrf24j40_stop(struct ieee802154_hw *hw)
> @@ -1025,6 +1027,9 @@ static void mrf24j40_intstat_complete(void *context)
>
> enable_irq(devrec->spi->irq);
>
> + if (intstat & BIT_SECIF)
> + regmap_write_async(devrec->regmap_short, REG_SECCON0, 0x80);
Not sure I like the magic number 0x80 here. Maybe a define for it?
> +
> /* Check for TX complete */
> if (intstat & BIT_TXNIF)
> ieee802154_xmit_complete(devrec->hw, devrec->tx_skb, false);
With the SOB and the magic number fixed you get my:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
regards
Stefan Schmidt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-10 18:14 [PATCH 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function web+oss
2016-03-10 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames web+oss
2016-03-14 11:05 ` Stefan Schmidt [this message]
2016-03-10 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] mrf24j40: apply the security-enabled bit on secured outbound frames web+oss
2016-03-14 11:06 ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-14 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function Stefan Schmidt
2016-04-08 17:37 ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-03-14 20:46 ` [PATCH v2 " Alexandre Macabies
2016-03-14 20:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-03-30 8:45 ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-14 20:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mrf24j40: apply the security-enabled bit on secured outbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-03-30 8:45 ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-30 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-30 14:05 ` Alan Ott
2016-03-30 16:43 ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-04-08 17:35 ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-04-12 16:53 ` [PATCH v3 " Alexandre Macabies
2016-04-12 16:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-04-13 8:44 ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-04-12 16:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mrf24j40: apply the security-enabled bit on secured outbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-04-13 8:44 ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-04-13 8:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E69AFD.7010604@osg.samsung.com \
--to=stefan@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=aar@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=web+oss@zopieux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox