Linux IEEE 802.15.4 and 6LoWPAN development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
To: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>,
	Alexandre Macabies <web+oss@zopieux.com>,
	linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Aring <aar@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:43:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FC0232.2060707@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FBDD39.1010301@signal11.us>

Hello.

On 30/03/16 16:05, Alan Ott wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 04:45 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Added Alan Ott in CC.
>>
>> Alan, can we get your review on this? Its sit son the list for almost 
>> three weeks now.
>> If you are to busy just say so and we can get the ACK from Alex and 
>> put them in.
>>
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Sorry I've been slow on this. Thanks for forwarding. I actually went 
> looking for v2 of this the other day in my inbox and it wasn't there.

Sorry for pushing this but I wanted to get these patches in a state 
where they can get applied. With my review and your ack they should be 
fine now.

>
> Alexandre, make sure you use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the list 
> of people you should send patches to. It looks like you put me on v1 
> but left me off v2.
>

Good point!

> For all three:
> Acked-by: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>
>

regards
Stefan Schmidt

> Alan.
>
>>
>> On 14/03/16 21:46, Alexandre Macabies wrote:
>>> ieee802154_is_secen checks if the 802.15.4 security bit is set in the
>>> frame control field.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aar@pengutronix.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Macabies <web+oss@zopieux.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>   include/linux/ieee802154.h | 10 ++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ieee802154.h b/include/linux/ieee802154.h
>>> index d3e4156..56090f1 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/ieee802154.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/ieee802154.h
>>> @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ enum {
>>>   /* frame control handling */
>>>   #define IEEE802154_FCTL_FTYPE        0x0003
>>>   #define IEEE802154_FCTL_ACKREQ        0x0020
>>> +#define IEEE802154_FCTL_SECEN        0x0004
>>>   #define IEEE802154_FCTL_INTRA_PAN    0x0040
>>>     #define IEEE802154_FTYPE_DATA        0x0001
>>> @@ -233,6 +234,15 @@ static inline int ieee802154_is_data(__le16 fc)
>>>   }
>>>     /**
>>> + * ieee802154_is_secen - check if Security bit is set
>>> + * @fc: frame control bytes in little-endian byteorder
>>> + */
>>> +static inline bool ieee802154_is_secen(__le16 fc)
>>> +{
>>> +    return fc & cpu_to_le16(IEEE802154_FCTL_SECEN);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>>    * ieee802154_is_ackreq - check if acknowledgment request bit is set
>>>    * @fc: frame control bytes in little-endian byteorder
>>>    */
>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-30 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 18:14 [PATCH 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function web+oss
2016-03-10 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames web+oss
2016-03-14 11:05   ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-10 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] mrf24j40: apply the security-enabled bit on secured outbound frames web+oss
2016-03-14 11:06   ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-14 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function Stefan Schmidt
2016-04-08 17:37   ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-03-14 20:46 ` [PATCH v2 " Alexandre Macabies
2016-03-14 20:46   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-03-30  8:45     ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-14 20:46   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mrf24j40: apply the security-enabled bit on secured outbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-03-30  8:45     ` Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-30  8:45   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function Stefan Schmidt
2016-03-30 14:05     ` Alan Ott
2016-03-30 16:43       ` Stefan Schmidt [this message]
2016-04-08 17:35         ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-04-12 16:53   ` [PATCH v3 " Alexandre Macabies
2016-04-12 16:53     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-04-13  8:44       ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-04-12 16:53     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mrf24j40: apply the security-enabled bit on secured outbound frames Alexandre Macabies
2016-04-13  8:44       ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-04-13  8:44     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ieee802154: add security bit check function Marcel Holtmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FC0232.2060707@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=stefan@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=aar@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=alan@signal11.us \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=web+oss@zopieux.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox