* Quota performance hit?
@ 2018-01-03 5:02 David Shaw
2018-01-03 6:43 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Shaw @ 2018-01-03 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs
Hello,
I wonder if anyone could point me towards any numbers on how much of a performance penalty project quotas incur on a write-heavy filesystem. The idea being discussed here is putting a project quota on the /var/log directory (so pretty write-heavy) to prevent it from overflowing /var, and thus causing problems for /var/lib, /var/tmp, and other things in /var that need some headroom. The alternative is to simply use two different filesystems for /var and /var/lib.
Any information or pointers would be welcome.
Thanks,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Quota performance hit?
2018-01-03 5:02 Quota performance hit? David Shaw
@ 2018-01-03 6:43 ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-03 13:32 ` David Shaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2018-01-03 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Shaw; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:02:13AM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if anyone could point me towards any numbers on how much
> of a performance penalty project quotas incur on a write-heavy
> filesystem. The idea being discussed here is putting a project
> quota on the /var/log directory (so pretty write-heavy)
/var/log is definitely a "mostly write" directory, but I wouldn't
ever classify it as "write heavy".
Unless you are trying to perform thousands of concurrent writes
and/or log file creation/removal operations every second to
/var/log, then putting a project quota on that directory is not
going to cause you any sort of noticable problem.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Quota performance hit?
2018-01-03 6:43 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2018-01-03 13:32 ` David Shaw
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Shaw @ 2018-01-03 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Jan 3, 2018, at 1:43 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:02:13AM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I wonder if anyone could point me towards any numbers on how much
>> of a performance penalty project quotas incur on a write-heavy
>> filesystem. The idea being discussed here is putting a project
>> quota on the /var/log directory (so pretty write-heavy)
>
> /var/log is definitely a "mostly write" directory, but I wouldn't
> ever classify it as "write heavy".
>
> Unless you are trying to perform thousands of concurrent writes
> and/or log file creation/removal operations every second to
> /var/log, then putting a project quota on that directory is not
> going to cause you any sort of noticable problem.
Excellent. Sounds like I have nothing to worry about.
Thanks,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-03 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-03 5:02 Quota performance hit? David Shaw
2018-01-03 6:43 ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-03 13:32 ` David Shaw
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox