Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: "Xu, Yang" <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "fstests@vger.kernel.org" <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question of xfs/148 and xfs/149
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:39:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917163933.GC736475@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF2FD5A942B1C4B828DDAF5635768C1041AB0E2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local>

[add linux-xfs to cc]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:00:57AM +0000, Xu, Yang wrote:
> HI All
> 
> When I investigated xfs/030 failure on upstream kernel after mering
> xfstests commit d0e484ac699f ("check: wipe scratch devices between
> tests"), I found two similar cases(xfs/148,xfs/149).
> 
> xfs/148 is a clone of test 030 using xfs_prepair64 instead of xfs_repair.
> xfs/149 is a clone of test 031 using xfs_prepair instead of xfs_repair
> 
> But I don't find these two commands and know nothing about them.  If
> these commands have been obsoleted long time ago, I think we can
> remove the two cases. Or may I miss something?

<shrug> I think your analysis is correct, but let's see what the xfs
list thinks.

--D

> 
> Thanks
> Yang Xu
> 
> 

       reply	other threads:[~2019-09-17 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4BF2FD5A942B1C4B828DDAF5635768C1041AB0E2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local>
2019-09-17 16:39 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-09-18  2:59   ` question of xfs/148 and xfs/149 Zorro Lang
2019-09-18  3:24     ` Yang Xu
2019-09-18 16:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-18 23:10         ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19  5:20           ` Zorro Lang
2019-09-19  6:33             ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19  6:59               ` Zorro Lang
2019-09-19 10:49         ` Yang Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190917163933.GC736475@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox