From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 0/2] xfs: rely on minleft instead of total for bmbt res
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:17:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018171720.GB6719@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190912143223.24194-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:32:21AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a repost of a couple patches I posted a few months ago[1]. There
> are no changes other than a rebase to for-next. Any thoughts on these? I
> think Carlos had also run into some related generic/223 failures fairly
> recently...
>
> Carlos,
>
> Any chance you could give these a try?
Any progress on this in the last month? I /think/ this is related to
the unaligned allocations that Dan's complaining about this morning.
--D
> Brian
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20190501140504.16435-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
>
> Brian Foster (2):
> xfs: drop minlen before tossing alignment on bmap allocs
> xfs: don't set bmapi total block req where minleft is sufficient
>
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 13 +++++++++----
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 4 ++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c | 4 ++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 4 ++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 4 ++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 3 +--
> 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 14:32 [PATCH REPOST 0/2] xfs: rely on minleft instead of total for bmbt res Brian Foster
2019-09-12 14:32 ` [PATCH REPOST 1/2] xfs: drop minlen before tossing alignment on bmap allocs Brian Foster
2019-09-12 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-12 22:46 ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-13 14:58 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-14 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-15 13:09 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 8:36 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-17 12:22 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-18 21:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 11:49 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-12 14:32 ` [PATCH REPOST 2/2] xfs: don't set bmapi total block req where minleft is sufficient Brian Foster
2019-09-18 21:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 11:55 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 8:18 ` [PATCH REPOST 0/2] xfs: rely on minleft instead of total for bmbt res Carlos Maiolino
2019-10-18 17:17 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-10-21 12:14 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191018171720.GB6719@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox