public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: "bfoster@redhat.com" <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"trondmy@kernel.org" <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Address soft lockup in iomap_finish_ioend()
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:08:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220111000808.GD945095@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220110233746.GB945095@dread.disaster.area>

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:37:46AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index c8c15c3c3147..82515d1ad4e0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,20 @@ xfs_end_ioend(
>  	memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
>  }
>  
> -/* Finish all pending io completions. */
> +/*
> + * Finish all pending IO completions that require transactional modifications.
> + *
> + * We try to merge physical and logically contiguous ioends before completion to
> + * minimise the number of transactions we need to perform during IO completion.
> + * Both unwritten extent conversion and COW remapping need to iterate and modify
> + * one physical extent at a time, so we gain nothing by merging physically
> + * discontiguous extents here.
> + *
> + * The ioend chain length that we can be processing here is largely unbound in
> + * length and we may have to perform significant amounts of work on each ioend
> + * to complete it. Hence we have to be careful about holding the CPU for too
> + * long in this loop.
> + */
>  void
>  xfs_end_io(
>  	struct work_struct	*work)
> @@ -147,6 +160,7 @@ xfs_end_io(
>  	struct list_head	tmp;
>  	unsigned long		flags;
>  
> +	msleep(5000);
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ip->i_ioend_lock, flags);
>  	list_replace_init(&ip->i_ioend_list, &tmp);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ip->i_ioend_lock, flags);

You might want to comment that 5s completion delay out before you
run the patch, Trond...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-11  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-30 19:35 [PATCH] iomap: Address soft lockup in iomap_finish_ioend() trondmy
2021-12-30 21:24 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-30 22:25   ` Trond Myklebust
2021-12-30 22:27     ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-30 22:55       ` Trond Myklebust
2021-12-31  1:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-31  6:16   ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-01  3:55     ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-01 17:39       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-03 22:03         ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-04  0:04           ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-04  1:22             ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-04  3:01               ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-04  7:08               ` hch
2022-01-04 18:08                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-04 18:14                   ` hch
2022-01-04 19:22                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-04 21:52                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-04 23:12                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05  2:10                           ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05 13:56                             ` Brian Foster
2022-01-05 22:04                               ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-06 16:44                                 ` Brian Foster
2022-01-10  8:18                                   ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-10 17:45                                     ` Brian Foster
2022-01-10 18:11                                       ` hch
2022-01-11 14:33                                       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-05 13:42                           ` hch
2022-01-04 21:16                 ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05 13:43                   ` hch
2022-01-05 22:34                     ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05  2:09               ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-05 20:45                 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-05 22:48                   ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05 23:29                     ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-06  0:01                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-09 23:09                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-06 18:36                     ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-06 18:38                       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-06 20:07                       ` Brian Foster
2022-01-07  3:08                         ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-07 15:15                           ` Brian Foster
2022-01-09 23:34                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-10 23:37                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-11  0:08                         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-01-13 17:01                         ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-17 17:24                           ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-17 17:36                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-04 13:36         ` Brian Foster
2022-01-04 19:23           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05  2:31 ` [iomap] f5934dda54: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_fs/iomap/buffered-io.c kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220111000808.GD945095@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox