public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 14/16] xfs: Enable bulkstat ioctl to support 64-bit per-inode extent counters
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:24:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220201192449.GB8338@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220121051857.221105-15-chandan.babu@oracle.com>

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:48:55AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> The following changes are made to enable userspace to obtain 64-bit extent
> counters,
> 1. Carve out a new 64-bit field xfs_bulkstat->bs_extents64 from
>    xfs_bulkstat->bs_pad[] to hold 64-bit extent counter.
> 2. Define the new flag XFS_BULK_IREQ_BULKSTAT for userspace to indicate that
>    it is capable of receiving 64-bit extent counters.
> 
> Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c     |  3 +++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h    |  7 ++++++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.h     |  7 +++++--
>  5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> index 42bc39501d81..4e12530eb518 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct xfs_bulkstat {
>  	uint32_t	bs_extsize_blks; /* extent size hint, blocks	*/
>  
>  	uint32_t	bs_nlink;	/* number of links		*/
> -	uint32_t	bs_extents;	/* number of extents		*/
> +	uint32_t	bs_extents;	/* 32-bit data fork extent counter */
>  	uint32_t	bs_aextents;	/* attribute number of extents	*/
>  	uint16_t	bs_version;	/* structure version		*/
>  	uint16_t	bs_forkoff;	/* inode fork offset in bytes	*/
> @@ -402,8 +402,9 @@ struct xfs_bulkstat {
>  	uint16_t	bs_checked;	/* checked inode metadata	*/
>  	uint16_t	bs_mode;	/* type and mode		*/
>  	uint16_t	bs_pad2;	/* zeroed			*/
> +	uint64_t	bs_extents64;	/* 64-bit data fork extent counter */
>  
> -	uint64_t	bs_pad[7];	/* zeroed			*/
> +	uint64_t	bs_pad[6];	/* zeroed			*/
>  };
>  
>  #define XFS_BULKSTAT_VERSION_V1	(1)
> @@ -484,8 +485,11 @@ struct xfs_bulk_ireq {
>   */
>  #define XFS_BULK_IREQ_SPECIAL	(1 << 1)
>  
> -#define XFS_BULK_IREQ_FLAGS_ALL	(XFS_BULK_IREQ_AGNO | \
> -				 XFS_BULK_IREQ_SPECIAL)
> +#define XFS_BULK_IREQ_NREXT64	(1 << 2)

This needs a comment specifying the behavior of this flag.

If the flag is set and the data fork extent count fits in both fields,
will they both be filled out?

If the flag is set but the data fork extent count only fits in
bs_extents64, what will be written to bs_extents?

If the flag is not set and the data fork extent count won't fit in
bs_extents, do we return an error value?  Fill it with garbage?

> +
> +#define XFS_BULK_IREQ_FLAGS_ALL	(XFS_BULK_IREQ_AGNO |	 \
> +				 XFS_BULK_IREQ_SPECIAL | \
> +				 XFS_BULK_IREQ_NREXT64)
>  
>  /* Operate on the root directory inode. */
>  #define XFS_BULK_IREQ_SPECIAL_ROOT	(1)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index 29231a8c8a45..5d0781745a28 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -893,6 +893,9 @@ xfs_bulk_ireq_setup(
>  	if (XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, breq->startino) >= mp->m_sb.sb_agcount)
>  		return -ECANCELED;
>  
> +	if (hdr->flags & XFS_BULK_IREQ_NREXT64)
> +		breq->flags |= XFS_IBULK_NREXT64;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> index c08c79d9e311..c9b44e8d0235 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include "xfs_icache.h"
>  #include "xfs_health.h"
>  #include "xfs_trans.h"
> +#include "xfs_errortag.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * Bulk Stat
> @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ xfs_bulkstat_one_int(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip;		/* incore inode pointer */
>  	struct inode		*inode;
>  	struct xfs_bulkstat	*buf = bc->buf;
> +	xfs_extnum_t		nextents;
>  	int			error = -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (xfs_internal_inum(mp, ino))
> @@ -102,7 +104,27 @@ xfs_bulkstat_one_int(
>  
>  	buf->bs_xflags = xfs_ip2xflags(ip);
>  	buf->bs_extsize_blks = ip->i_extsize;
> -	buf->bs_extents = xfs_ifork_nextents(&ip->i_df);
> +
> +	nextents = xfs_ifork_nextents(&ip->i_df);
> +	if (!(bc->breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_NREXT64)) {
> +		xfs_extnum_t max_nextents = XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_DATA_FORK_OLD;
> +
> +		if (unlikely(XFS_TEST_ERROR(false, mp,
> +				XFS_ERRTAG_REDUCE_MAX_IEXTENTS)))
> +			max_nextents = 10;
> +
> +		if (nextents > max_nextents) {
> +			xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
> +			xfs_irele(ip);
> +			error = -EOVERFLOW;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		buf->bs_extents = nextents;
> +	} else {
> +		buf->bs_extents64 = nextents;
> +	}
> +
>  	xfs_bulkstat_health(ip, buf);
>  	buf->bs_aextents = xfs_ifork_nextents(ip->i_afp);
>  	buf->bs_forkoff = XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip);
> @@ -279,7 +301,8 @@ xfs_bulkstat(
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	error = xfs_iwalk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, breq->flags,
> +	error = xfs_iwalk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino,
> +			breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_IWALK_MASK,

I think it would be cleaner if this function did:

	unsigned int	iwalk_flags = 0;

	if (breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG)
		iwalk_flags |= XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG;

	...

	error = xfs_iwalk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, iwalk_flags,
			xfs_bulkstat_iwalk, breq->icount, &bc);

to make the flags translation explicit.  That enables a full cleanup
of...

>  			xfs_bulkstat_iwalk, breq->icount, &bc);
>  	xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
>  out:
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h
> index 7078d10c9b12..38f6900176a8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h
> @@ -13,12 +13,17 @@ struct xfs_ibulk {
>  	xfs_ino_t		startino; /* start with this inode */
>  	unsigned int		icount;   /* number of elements in ubuffer */
>  	unsigned int		ocount;   /* number of records returned */
> -	unsigned int		flags;    /* see XFS_IBULK_FLAG_* */
> +	unsigned long long	flags;    /* see XFS_IBULK_FLAG_* */
>  };
>  
>  /* Only iterate within the same AG as startino */
>  #define XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG	(XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG)
>  
> +#define XFS_IBULK_ONLY_OFFSET	32
> +#define XFS_IBULK_IWALK_MASK	((1ULL << XFS_IBULK_ONLY_OFFSET) - 1)
> +
> +#define XFS_IBULK_NREXT64	(1ULL << XFS_IBULK_ONLY_OFFSET)

...the code smells in the XFS_IBULK* flag space:

/* Only iterate within the same AG as startino */
#define XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG	(1 << 0)

/* Whatever it is that nrext64 does */
#define XFS_IBULK_NREXT64	(1 << 31)

> +
>  /*
>   * Advance the user buffer pointer by one record of the given size.  If the
>   * buffer is now full, return the appropriate error code.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.h
> index 37a795f03267..11be9dbb45c7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.h
> @@ -26,9 +26,12 @@ int xfs_iwalk_threaded(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_ino_t startino,
>  		unsigned int inode_records, bool poll, void *data);
>  
>  /* Only iterate inodes within the same AG as @startino. */
> -#define XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG	(0x1)
> +#define XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG	(1 << 0)
>  
> -#define XFS_IWALK_FLAGS_ALL	(XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG)
> +#define XFS_IWALK_NREXT64	(1 << 1)
> +
> +#define XFS_IWALK_FLAGS_ALL	(XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG |	\
> +				 XFS_IWALK_NREXT64)

XFS_IWALK_NREXT64 isn't used anywhere.

--D

>  
>  /* Walk all inode btree records in the filesystem starting from @startino. */
>  typedef int (*xfs_inobt_walk_fn)(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_trans *tp,
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-01 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21  5:18 [PATCH V5 00/16] xfs: Extend per-inode extent counters Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 01/16] xfs: Move extent count limits to xfs_format.h Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 02/16] xfs: Introduce xfs_iext_max_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 03/16] xfs: Use xfs_extnum_t instead of basic data types Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 04/16] xfs: Introduce xfs_dfork_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 05/16] xfs: Use basic types to define xfs_log_dinode's di_nextents and di_anextents Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 06/16] xfs: Promote xfs_extnum_t and xfs_aextnum_t to 64 and 32-bits respectively Chandan Babu R
2022-01-25  0:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 07/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 and associated per-fs feature bit Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 08/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_NREXT64 Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 09/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64 and associated helpers Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 10/16] xfs: Use xfs_rfsblock_t to count maximum blocks that can be used by BMBT Chandan Babu R
2022-01-25  0:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 11/16] xfs: Introduce macros to represent new maximum extent counts for data/attr forks Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 18:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 12/16] xfs: Introduce per-inode 64-bit extent counters Chandan Babu R
2022-01-25 22:51   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-26  8:50     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 18:51       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-01 19:10   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-07  4:54     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 13/16] xfs: Conditionally upgrade existing inodes to use " Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 20:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-07  4:55     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-07 17:11       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-11 12:10         ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-14 17:07           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-15  6:48             ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-15  9:33               ` Dave Chinner
2022-02-15 11:33                 ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-15 13:16                   ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-16  1:16                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-16  3:59                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-02-16 12:34                         ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 14/16] xfs: Enable bulkstat ioctl to support 64-bit per-inode " Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 19:24   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-02-07  4:56     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-07  9:46       ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 15/16] xfs: Add XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 to the list of supported flags Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 16/16] xfs: Define max extent length based on on-disk format definition Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 19:26   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220201192449.GB8338@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox