Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	djwong@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 12/16] xfs: Introduce per-inode 64-bit extent counters
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:20:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k5qop7g.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202201260622.XxiP4fe5-lkp@intel.com>

On 26 Jan 2022 at 04:21, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Chandan,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on xfs-linux/for-next]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.17-rc1 next-20220125]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chandan-Babu-R/xfs-Extend-per-inode-extent-counters/20220121-132128
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next
> config: arm-randconfig-c003-20220122 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220126/202201260622.XxiP4fe5-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/f12e8b5064fc3ef50c9d26f15f4a6984db59927c
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Chandan-Babu-R/xfs-Extend-per-inode-extent-counters/20220121-132128
>         git checkout f12e8b5064fc3ef50c9d26f15f4a6984db59927c
>         # save the config file to linux build tree
>         mkdir build_dir
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash fs/xfs/
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    In file included from <command-line>:
>    In function 'xfs_check_ondisk_structs',
>        inlined from 'init_xfs_fs' at fs/xfs/xfs_super.c:2223:2:
>>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:335:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_900' declared with attribute error: XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_dinode) is wrong, expected 176
>      335 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>          |                                             ^
>    include/linux/compiler_types.h:316:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
>      316 |                         prefix ## suffix();                             \
>          |                         ^~~~~~
>    include/linux/compiler_types.h:335:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
>      335 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>          |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
>       39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
>          |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
>       10 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(sizeof(structname) != (size), "XFS: sizeof(" \
>          |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h:37:9: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE'
>       37 |         XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_dinode,                176);
>          |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>

The following newly introduced union inside "struct xfs_dinode" and the
corresponding one in "struct xfs_log_dinode",
        union {
                struct {
                        __be32  di_big_anextents; /* NREXT64 attr extents */
                        __be16  di_nrext64_pad; /* NREXT64 unused, zero */
                } __packed;
                struct {
                        __be32  di_nextents;    /* !NREXT64 data extents */
                        __be16  di_anextents;   /* !NREXT64 attr extents */
                } __packed;
        };

needs to be packed as well. I will include this fix in the next version of the
patchset.

>
> vim +/__compiletime_assert_900 +335 include/linux/compiler_types.h
>
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  321  
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  322  #define _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  323  	__compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  324  
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  325  /**
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  326   * compiletime_assert - break build and emit msg if condition is false
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  327   * @condition: a compile-time constant condition to check
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  328   * @msg:       a message to emit if condition is false
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  329   *
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  330   * In tradition of POSIX assert, this macro will break the build if the
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  331   * supplied condition is *false*, emitting the supplied error message if the
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  332   * compiler has support to do so.
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  333   */
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  334  #define compiletime_assert(condition, msg) \
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 @335  	_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  336  
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org


-- 
chandan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21  5:18 [PATCH V5 00/16] xfs: Extend per-inode extent counters Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 01/16] xfs: Move extent count limits to xfs_format.h Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 02/16] xfs: Introduce xfs_iext_max_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 03/16] xfs: Use xfs_extnum_t instead of basic data types Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 04/16] xfs: Introduce xfs_dfork_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 05/16] xfs: Use basic types to define xfs_log_dinode's di_nextents and di_anextents Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 06/16] xfs: Promote xfs_extnum_t and xfs_aextnum_t to 64 and 32-bits respectively Chandan Babu R
2022-01-25  0:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 07/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 and associated per-fs feature bit Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 08/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_NREXT64 Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 09/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64 and associated helpers Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 10/16] xfs: Use xfs_rfsblock_t to count maximum blocks that can be used by BMBT Chandan Babu R
2022-01-25  0:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 11/16] xfs: Introduce macros to represent new maximum extent counts for data/attr forks Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 18:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 12/16] xfs: Introduce per-inode 64-bit extent counters Chandan Babu R
2022-01-25 22:51   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-26  8:50     ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
2022-02-01 18:51       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-01 19:10   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-07  4:54     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 13/16] xfs: Conditionally upgrade existing inodes to use " Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 20:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-07  4:55     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-07 17:11       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-11 12:10         ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-14 17:07           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-15  6:48             ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-15  9:33               ` Dave Chinner
2022-02-15 11:33                 ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-15 13:16                   ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-16  1:16                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-16  3:59                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-02-16 12:34                         ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 14/16] xfs: Enable bulkstat ioctl to support 64-bit per-inode " Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 19:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-07  4:56     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-02-07  9:46       ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 15/16] xfs: Add XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 to the list of supported flags Chandan Babu R
2022-01-21  5:18 ` [PATCH V5 16/16] xfs: Define max extent length based on on-disk format definition Chandan Babu R
2022-02-01 19:26   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874k5qop7g.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 \
    --to=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox