public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: reduce the number of atomic when locking a buffer after lookup
Date: Sun,  3 Apr 2022 14:01:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220403120119.235457-5-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220403120119.235457-1-hch@lst.de>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Avoid an extra atomic operation in the non-trylock case by only doing a
trylock if the XBF_TRYLOCK flag is set. This follows the pattern in the
IO path with NOWAIT semantics where the "trylock-fail-lock" path showed
5-10% reduced throughput compared to just using single lock call when not
under NOWAIT conditions. So make that same change here, too.

See commit 942491c9e6d6 ("xfs: fix AIM7 regression") for details.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
[hch: split from a larger patch]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index ef645e15935369..dd68aee52118c2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -636,12 +636,13 @@ xfs_buf_get_map(
 	}
 	xfs_perag_put(pag);
 
-	if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp)) {
-		if (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) {
+	if (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) {
+		if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp)) {
 			xfs_buf_rele(bp);
 			XFS_STATS_INC(mp, xb_busy_locked);
 			return -EAGAIN;
 		}
+	} else {
 		xfs_buf_lock(bp);
 		XFS_STATS_INC(mp, xb_get_locked_waited);
 	}
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-03 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-03 12:01 lockless and cleaned up buffer lookup Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: add a flags argument to xfs_buf_get Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: replace xfs_buf_incore with an XBF_NOALLOC flag to xfs_buf_get* Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 21:54   ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-05 14:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 21:21       ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-06 16:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: remove a superflous hash lookup when inserting new buffers Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 23:04   ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-05 15:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 22:01       ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-06 16:26         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: lockless buffer lookup Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220403120119.235457-5-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox