public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: replace xfs_buf_incore with an XBF_NOALLOC flag to xfs_buf_get*
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:24:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220406162441.GA590@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405212133.GY1544202@dread.disaster.area>

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 07:21:33AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I had that earlier, but having xfs_buf_incore as the odd one out that
> > still returns a buffer (like most XFS buffer cache routines did back
> > a long time ago) just did seem pretty odd compared tothe rest.
> 
> Then let's fix that to use the same interface as everything else,
> and that simplifies the implementation down to just:
> 
> static inline int
> xfs_buf_incore(
> 	struct xfs_buftarg	*target,
> 	xfs_daddr_t		blkno,
> 	size_t			numblks,
> 	xfs_buf_flags_t		flags,
> 	struct xfs_buf		**bpp)
> {
> 	DEFINE_SINGLE_BUF_MAP(map, blkno, numblks);
> 
> 	return xfs_buf_get_map(target, &map, 1, _XBF_INCORE | flags,
> 				NULL, bpp);
> }
> 
> And, FWIW, the _XBF_NOALLOC flag really wants to be _XBF_INCORE - we
> need it to describe the lookup behaviour the flag provides, not the
> internal implementation detail that acheives the desired
> behaviour....

At least in my mental model a 'find but do not allocate' matches
the lookup behavior more than the somewhat odd 'incore' name.  I know
it is something traditional Unix including IRIX has used forever,
but it is a bit of an odd choice with no history in Linux.

That being said the flag and the wrapper should match, so IFF we keep
xfs_buf_incore the flag should also be _XBF_INCORE.  Still not my
preference, though.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-06 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-03 12:01 lockless and cleaned up buffer lookup Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: add a flags argument to xfs_buf_get Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: replace xfs_buf_incore with an XBF_NOALLOC flag to xfs_buf_get* Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 21:54   ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-05 14:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 21:21       ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-06 16:24         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: remove a superflous hash lookup when inserting new buffers Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 23:04   ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-05 15:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 22:01       ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-06 16:26         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: reduce the number of atomic when locking a buffer after lookup Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-03 12:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: lockless buffer lookup Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220406162441.GA590@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox