From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Kelu Ye <yekelu1@huawei.com>, Yifan Zhao <zhaoyifan28@huawei.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iomap: submit read bio after each extent
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 06:31:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626043117.GB8078@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625174758.GE6078@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:47:58AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 02:07:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currently the iomap buffered read path tries to build up read context
> > (i.e. bios for the typical block based case) over multiple iomaps as
> > long as the sector matches. This does not take into account files
> > that can map to multiple different devices. While this could be fixed
> > by a bdev check in iomap_bio_read_folio_range, the building up of I/O
> > over iomaps actually was a problem for the not yet merged ext2 iomap
> > port, as that does want to send out I/O at the end of an indirect
> > block mapped range.
>
> This really puts the onus on block-mapped filesystems (e.g. ext2) to
> merge adjacent maps into extents. Granted they *probably* already have
> been doing that.
Yes. In fact the ext2 conversion was the first ask for this change,
because they do not want unlimited merging but kick off I/O at the
indirect block boundary.
> > So instead of adding more checks move over to a model where a bio only
> > spans a single iomap. Change ->submit_read to be called after each
> > iteration, and pass a force argument to indicate that the bio must
> > be submitted set on the last iteration. Switch the bio based users
> > to always submit, while keeping the single submit for fuse.
>
> Is fuse the sole reason for the "force" parameter to exist? I wonder if
> fuse could drop its submit_read function and call fuse_send_readpages
> after the iomap_read{ahead,folio} function returns?
Probably..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 12:07 don't build bios/contexts over multiple iomaps v3 Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] iomap: consolidate bio submission Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 17:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26 4:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: submit read bio after each extent Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 17:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-25 18:32 ` Joanne Koong
2026-06-26 4:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-26 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-26 6:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26 14:51 ` Joanne Koong
2026-06-26 4:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-23 13:51 don't build bios/contexts over multiple iomaps v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-23 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: submit read bio after each extent Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-23 17:29 ` Joanne Koong
2026-06-24 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-23 23:58 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-06-24 7:42 ` zhaoyifan (H)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260626043117.GB8078@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=yekelu1@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaoyifan28@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox