Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Kelu Ye <yekelu1@huawei.com>, Yifan Zhao <zhaoyifan28@huawei.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
	Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
	Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iomap: submit read bio after each extent
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 06:31:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626043117.GB8078@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625174758.GE6078@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:47:58AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 02:07:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currently the iomap buffered read path tries to build up read context
> > (i.e. bios for the typical block based case) over multiple iomaps as
> > long as the sector matches.  This does not take into account files
> > that can map to multiple different devices.  While this could be fixed
> > by a bdev check in iomap_bio_read_folio_range, the building up of I/O
> > over iomaps actually was a problem for the not yet merged ext2 iomap
> > port, as that does want to send out I/O at the end of an indirect
> > block mapped range.
> 
> This really puts the onus on block-mapped filesystems (e.g. ext2) to
> merge adjacent maps into extents.  Granted they *probably* already have
> been doing that.

Yes.  In fact the ext2 conversion was the first ask for this change,
because they do not want unlimited merging but kick off I/O at the
indirect block boundary.

> > So instead of adding more checks move over to a model where a bio only
> > spans a single iomap.  Change ->submit_read to be called after each
> > iteration, and pass a force argument to indicate that the bio must
> > be submitted set on the last iteration.  Switch the bio based users
> > to always submit, while keeping the single submit for fuse.
> 
> Is fuse the sole reason for the "force" parameter to exist?  I wonder if
> fuse could drop its submit_read function and call fuse_send_readpages
> after the iomap_read{ahead,folio} function returns?

Probably..


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-25 12:07 don't build bios/contexts over multiple iomaps v3 Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] iomap: consolidate bio submission Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 17:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26  4:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: submit read bio after each extent Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 17:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-25 18:32     ` Joanne Koong
2026-06-26  4:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-26  6:16         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-26  6:20           ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26 14:51           ` Joanne Koong
2026-06-26  4:31     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-23 13:51 don't build bios/contexts over multiple iomaps v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-23 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: submit read bio after each extent Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-23 17:29   ` Joanne Koong
2026-06-24  7:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-23 23:58   ` Namjae Jeon
2026-06-24  7:42   ` zhaoyifan (H)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260626043117.GB8078@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=yekelu1@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhaoyifan28@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox