Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] xfs: adjust datadev sector count to reflect internal rt volumes
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:04:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730150442.GA3556460@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730082204.GE10558@lst.de>

On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 10:22:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 10:27:20PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > A media scan of a filesystem containing an internal rt volume produced
> > an error in xfs_scrub phase 6 complaining about a truncated realtime
> > device.  The rt device wasn't truncated, but the media scan code thought
> > we were trying to start a scan past the end of m_rtdev_targp.  That in
> > turn is an alias for m_ddev_targp, but in xfs_configure_buftarg we set
> > nr_sectors to the size of the data section.  Oops.
> > 
> > On these filesystems, the internal rt section comes immediately after
> > the data section.  We need to set the sector count for the data device
> > buftarg to the size of both sections.  Without this, media scans don't
> > work and media failure notifications from the kernel will be discarded
> > silently.
> > 
> > We also need to fix the superblock buffer recovery code to do the same.
> 
> This feels wrong.  Nothing should acess the internal rtdev through
> the data device buftarg.

It's the only one available, because xfs_setup_devices aliases
ddev_targp to rtdev_targp for internal rt volumes:

	if (mp->m_sb.sb_rtstart) {
		if (mp->m_rtdev_targp) {
			xfs_warn(mp,
		"can't use internal and external rtdev at the same time");
			return -EINVAL;
		}
		mp->m_rtdev_targp = mp->m_ddev_targp;
	}

So we're doing that anyway.  We could separate them by creating a second
buftarg with a duplicate struct file, but that would involve a bunch of
rototillingi because a fair amount of code changes behavior on
rtdev==ddev now.

The only field that the media verification code uses is bt_nr_sectors,
which it uses to trim verification requests to wherever the filesystem
thinks is the end of the device.  I could change that to call
bdev_nr_sectors() to fix the bug, but then we'd have to deal with media
failures for LBAs outside of the filesystem, which didn't seem ideal.

Also, if someone asynchronously reports a media error in the internal
rtdev to us through fs_holder_ops, the report will mention a range that
is beyond bt_nr_sectors but actually within the filesystem.
xfs_dax_notify_failure currently does the right thing because it doesn't
check bt_nr_sectors, but that also feels wrong. ;)

So I went with making bt_nr_sectors bigger because that felt the least
awkward.  IIRC it's supposed to represent the location of the end of the
filesystem on a particular blockdev, not the highest LBA that the fs
can xfs_buf_read(), right?

> Is this an LLM report bug, or did you actually run it using scrub?  If
> so can you help with the reproducer?

I found it accidentally while triaging another bug that LOLLM found.
I turned on the tracepoints (and btrace) for debugging and noticed that
it wasn't issuing reads for the internal rt device:

# mkfs.xfs /dev/sda -r zoned=1
# mount /dev/sda /mnt/scratch
# trace-cmd <big ugly command line> &
# xfs_io -x -c 'verifymedia -r' /mnt/scratch

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  5:26 [PATCHSET] xfs: LLM-inspired bug fixes, part 5 Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-30  5:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: fix unit conversions in per_binval computation Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-30  8:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30  5:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: fix short ifork reaping computation in xreap_bmapi_binval Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-30  8:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30  5:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: fix name string recording in slowpath pptr tracepoints Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-30  8:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30  5:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: don't leak dqacct if rhashtable insertion fails Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-30  8:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30  5:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: adjust datadev sector count to reflect internal rt volumes Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-30  8:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30 15:04     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-07-30  5:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: fix the rtrmap and rtrefcount _maxlevels_ondisk functions Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-30  8:26   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260730150442.GA3556460@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox