Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker
@ 2026-09-21  7:10 Kefeng Wang
  2026-09-21 10:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kefeng Wang @ 2026-09-21  7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs
  Cc: Darrick J . Wong, Shakeel Butt, Dave Chinner, Kefeng Wang,
	Christoph Hellwig, Brian Foster

xfs_btree_split_worker() calls xfs_trans_set_context() and
xfs_trans_clear_context() on the caller's transaction, overwriting
tp->t_pflags with the worker's NOFS state. When the caller already has
PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS set (e.g. xfs_end_ioend_write, xfs_dio_write_end_io),
the corrupted tp->t_pflags causes xfs_trans_free() to erroneously clear
the caller's NOFS protection.

Use memalloc_nofs_save/restore with a local variable instead so
tp->t_pflags is never touched.

Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902131653.1338227-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Fixes: 756b1c343333 ("xfs: use current->journal_info for detecting transaction recursion")
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
v3:
- Using correct unsigned int type for nofs_flags, per Darrick

v2:
- Send bugfix only based on xfs-linux/for-next, suggested by Carlos[1]
  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/aqqGiu9W0G7dquoY@nidhogg.toxiclabs.cc/
v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20260911104227.2028941-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
index 60ef7f08b1d3..239741132914 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
@@ -3010,6 +3010,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
 						struct xfs_btree_split_args, work);
 	unsigned long		pflags;
 	unsigned long		new_pflags = 0;
+	unsigned int		nofs_flags;
 
 	/*
 	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
@@ -3021,12 +3022,17 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
 		new_pflags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_KSWAPD;
 
 	current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
-	xfs_trans_set_context(args->cur->bc_tp);
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't use xfs_trans_set_context() here: it would overwrite the
+	 * caller's saved NOFS state in tp->t_pflags. Use a local scope.
+	 */
+	nofs_flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
 
 	args->result = __xfs_btree_split(args->cur, args->level, args->ptrp,
 					 args->key, args->curp, args->stat);
 
-	xfs_trans_clear_context(args->cur->bc_tp);
+	memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flags);
 	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.55.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker
  2026-09-21  7:10 [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker Kefeng Wang
@ 2026-09-21 10:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
  2026-09-21 14:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
  2026-10-05 18:06 ` Carlos Maiolino
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-09-21 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kefeng Wang
  Cc: linux-xfs, Darrick J . Wong, Shakeel Butt, Dave Chinner,
	Christoph Hellwig, Brian Foster

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 03:10:30PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> xfs_btree_split_worker() calls xfs_trans_set_context() and
> xfs_trans_clear_context() on the caller's transaction, overwriting
> tp->t_pflags with the worker's NOFS state. When the caller already has
> PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS set (e.g. xfs_end_ioend_write, xfs_dio_write_end_io),
> the corrupted tp->t_pflags causes xfs_trans_free() to erroneously clear
> the caller's NOFS protection.
> 
> Use memalloc_nofs_save/restore with a local variable instead so
> tp->t_pflags is never touched.
> 
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902131653.1338227-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
> Fixes: 756b1c343333 ("xfs: use current->journal_info for detecting transaction recursion")
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>

> ---
> v3:
> - Using correct unsigned int type for nofs_flags, per Darrick
> 
> v2:
> - Send bugfix only based on xfs-linux/for-next, suggested by Carlos[1]
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/aqqGiu9W0G7dquoY@nidhogg.toxiclabs.cc/
> v1:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20260911104227.2028941-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> index 60ef7f08b1d3..239741132914 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> @@ -3010,6 +3010,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>  						struct xfs_btree_split_args, work);
>  	unsigned long		pflags;
>  	unsigned long		new_pflags = 0;
> +	unsigned int		nofs_flags;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
> @@ -3021,12 +3022,17 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>  		new_pflags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_KSWAPD;
>  
>  	current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> -	xfs_trans_set_context(args->cur->bc_tp);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't use xfs_trans_set_context() here: it would overwrite the
> +	 * caller's saved NOFS state in tp->t_pflags. Use a local scope.
> +	 */
> +	nofs_flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  
>  	args->result = __xfs_btree_split(args->cur, args->level, args->ptrp,
>  					 args->key, args->curp, args->stat);
>  
> -	xfs_trans_clear_context(args->cur->bc_tp);
> +	memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flags);
>  	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker
  2026-09-21  7:10 [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker Kefeng Wang
  2026-09-21 10:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
@ 2026-09-21 14:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
  2026-10-05 18:06 ` Carlos Maiolino
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2026-09-21 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kefeng Wang
  Cc: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs, Shakeel Butt, Dave Chinner,
	Christoph Hellwig, Brian Foster

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 03:10:30PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> xfs_btree_split_worker() calls xfs_trans_set_context() and
> xfs_trans_clear_context() on the caller's transaction, overwriting
> tp->t_pflags with the worker's NOFS state. When the caller already has
> PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS set (e.g. xfs_end_ioend_write, xfs_dio_write_end_io),
> the corrupted tp->t_pflags causes xfs_trans_free() to erroneously clear
> the caller's NOFS protection.
> 
> Use memalloc_nofs_save/restore with a local variable instead so
> tp->t_pflags is never touched.
> 
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902131653.1338227-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
> Fixes: 756b1c343333 ("xfs: use current->journal_info for detecting transaction recursion")
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

Looks good to me now, thanks for cleaning this up
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
> v3:
> - Using correct unsigned int type for nofs_flags, per Darrick
> 
> v2:
> - Send bugfix only based on xfs-linux/for-next, suggested by Carlos[1]
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/aqqGiu9W0G7dquoY@nidhogg.toxiclabs.cc/
> v1:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20260911104227.2028941-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> index 60ef7f08b1d3..239741132914 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> @@ -3010,6 +3010,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>  						struct xfs_btree_split_args, work);
>  	unsigned long		pflags;
>  	unsigned long		new_pflags = 0;
> +	unsigned int		nofs_flags;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
> @@ -3021,12 +3022,17 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>  		new_pflags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_KSWAPD;
>  
>  	current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> -	xfs_trans_set_context(args->cur->bc_tp);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't use xfs_trans_set_context() here: it would overwrite the
> +	 * caller's saved NOFS state in tp->t_pflags. Use a local scope.
> +	 */
> +	nofs_flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  
>  	args->result = __xfs_btree_split(args->cur, args->level, args->ptrp,
>  					 args->key, args->curp, args->stat);
>  
> -	xfs_trans_clear_context(args->cur->bc_tp);
> +	memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flags);
>  	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker
  2026-09-21  7:10 [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker Kefeng Wang
  2026-09-21 10:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
  2026-09-21 14:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2026-10-05 18:06 ` Carlos Maiolino
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-10-05 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs, Kefeng Wang
  Cc: Darrick J . Wong, Shakeel Butt, Dave Chinner, Christoph Hellwig,
	Brian Foster

On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 15:10:30 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> xfs_btree_split_worker() calls xfs_trans_set_context() and
> xfs_trans_clear_context() on the caller's transaction, overwriting
> tp->t_pflags with the worker's NOFS state. When the caller already has
> PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS set (e.g. xfs_end_ioend_write, xfs_dio_write_end_io),
> the corrupted tp->t_pflags causes xfs_trans_free() to erroneously clear
> the caller's NOFS protection.
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next, thanks!

[1/1] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker
      commit: 23f91a51425ed3d4a5c42978fc25f1087611e4ba

Best regards,
-- 
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-05 18:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-21  7:10 [PATCH for-next v3] xfs: fix NOFS state corruption in btree split worker Kefeng Wang
2026-09-21 10:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-09-21 14:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 18:06 ` Carlos Maiolino

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox