From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
djwong@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] common/rc: Add fio atomic write helpers
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 14:11:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ccbd7de-29cf-4930-a781-be7a062a4385@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c940c2d672d963cc7775df082e9ce6894905f92d.1757610403.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On 11/09/2025 18:13, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> The main motivation of adding this function on top of _require_fio is
> that there has been a case in fio where atomic= option was added but
> later it was changed to noop since kernel didn't yet have support for
> atomic writes. It was then again utilized to do atomic writes in a later
> version, once kernel got the support. Due to this there is a point in
> fio where _require_fio w/ atomic=1 will succeed even though it would
> not be doing atomic writes.
>
> Hence, add an internal helper __require_fio_version to require specific
> versions of fio to work past such issues. Further, add the high level
> _require_fio_atomic_writes helper which tests can use to ensure fio
> has the right version for atomic writes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks for doing this.
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> common/rc | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 28fbbcbb..8a023b9d 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -6000,6 +6000,49 @@ _max() {
> echo $ret
> }
>
> +# Due to reasons explained in fio commit 40f1fc11d, fio version between
> +# v3.33 and v3.38 have atomic= feature but it is a no-op and doesn't do
> +# RWF_ATOMIC write. Hence, use this helper to ensure fio has the
> +# required support. Currently, the simplest way we have is to ensure
> +# the version.
> +_require_fio_atomic_writes() {
> + __require_fio_version "3.38+"
> +}
> +
> +# Check the required fio version. Examples:
> +# __require_fio_version 3.38 (matches 3.38 only)
> +# __require_fio_version 3.38+ (matches 3.38 and above)
> +# __require_fio_version 3.38- (matches 3.38 and below)
> +#
> +# Internal helper, avoid using directly in tests.
> +__require_fio_version() {
> + local req_ver="$1"
> + local fio_ver
> +
> + _require_fio
> + _require_math
> +
> + fio_ver=$(fio -v | cut -d"-" -f2)
> +
> + case "$req_ver" in
> + *+)
> + req_ver=${req_ver%+}
> + test $(_math "$fio_ver >= $req_ver") -eq 1 || \
> + _notrun "need fio >= $req_ver (found $fio_ver)"
> + ;;
> + *-)
> + req_ver=${req_ver%-}
> + test $(_math "$fio_ver <= $req_ver") -eq 1 || \
> + _notrun "need fio <= $req_ver (found $fio_ver)"
> + ;;
> + *)
> + req_ver=${req_ver%-}
> + test $(_math "$fio_ver == $req_ver") -eq 1 || \
> + _notrun "need fio = $req_ver (found $fio_ver)"
> + ;;
> + esac
> +}
> +
> ################################################################################
> # make sure this script returns success
> /bin/true
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-11 17:13 [PATCH v6 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-12 16:53 ` John Garry
2025-09-15 11:19 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] common/rc: Add fio atomic write helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-15 13:11 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-15 13:12 ` John Garry
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-15 13:26 ` John Garry
2025-09-17 8:09 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-18 7:29 ` John Garry
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] ext4: Test atomic write and ioend codepaths with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] ext4: Test atomic writes allocation and write " Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ccbd7de-29cf-4930-a781-be7a062a4385@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox