* [PATCH] xfs: test xfsdump with bind-mounted filesystem
@ 2022-02-14 20:34 Masayoshi Mizuma
2022-02-16 7:07 ` Zorro Lang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2022-02-14 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fstests; +Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma, Masayoshi Mizuma, linux-xfs
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
commit 25195eb ("xfsdump: handle bind mount target") introduced
a bug of xfsdump which doesn't store the files to the dump file
correctly when the root inode number is changed.
The commit 25195eb is reverted, and commit 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept
bind mount targets") which is in xfsdump v3.1.10 fixes the bug to reject
the filesystem if it's bind-mounted.
Test that xfsdump can reject the bind-mounted filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
tests/xfs/544 | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/xfs/544.out | 2 ++
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/xfs/544
create mode 100644 tests/xfs/544.out
diff --git a/tests/xfs/544 b/tests/xfs/544
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..1d586ebc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/544
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2022 Fujitsu Limited. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test 544
+#
+# Regression test for commit:
+# 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept bind mount targets")
+
+. ./common/preamble
+_begin_fstest auto dump
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ _cleanup_dump
+ cd /
+ rm -r -f $tmp.*
+ $UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null
+ rmdir $mntpnt1/dir 2> /dev/null
+ $UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null
+ rmdir $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null
+ rmdir $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null
+ [ -n "$loopdev" ] && _destroy_loop_device $loopdev
+ rm -f "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile
+}
+
+# Import common functions.
+. ./common/filter
+. ./common/dump
+
+# real QA test starts here
+
+_supported_fs xfs
+
+mntpnt1=$TEST_DIR/MNT1
+mntpnt2=$TEST_DIR/MNT2
+
+
+# Set up
+$MKFS_XFS_PROG -s size=4096 -b size=4096 \
+ -dfile,name=$TEST_DIR/fsfile,size=8649728b,sunit=1024,swidth=2048 \
+ >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
+
+loopdev=$(_create_loop_device "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile)
+
+mkdir $mntpnt1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1\" failed"
+
+_mount $loopdev $mntpnt1
+mkdir $mntpnt1/dir >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1/dir\" failed"
+mkdir $mntpnt2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt2\" failed"
+
+
+# Test
+echo "*** dump with bind-mounted test ***" >> $seqres.full
+
+mount -o bind $mntpnt1/dir $mntpnt2
+
+$XFSDUMP_PROG -L session -M test -f $tmp.dump $mntpnt2 \
+ >> $seqres.full 2>&1 && echo "dump with bind-mounted should be failed, but passed."
+
+echo "Silence is golden"
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/xfs/544.out b/tests/xfs/544.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fc7ebff3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/544.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 544
+Silence is golden
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] xfs: test xfsdump with bind-mounted filesystem 2022-02-14 20:34 [PATCH] xfs: test xfsdump with bind-mounted filesystem Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2022-02-16 7:07 ` Zorro Lang 2022-02-16 14:32 ` Masayoshi Mizuma 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Zorro Lang @ 2022-02-16 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masayoshi Mizuma; +Cc: fstests, Masayoshi Mizuma, linux-xfs On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:34:09PM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: > From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> > > commit 25195eb ("xfsdump: handle bind mount target") introduced > a bug of xfsdump which doesn't store the files to the dump file > correctly when the root inode number is changed. > > The commit 25195eb is reverted, and commit 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept > bind mount targets") which is in xfsdump v3.1.10 fixes the bug to reject > the filesystem if it's bind-mounted. > > Test that xfsdump can reject the bind-mounted filesystem. > > Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> > --- > tests/xfs/544 | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/544.out | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/544 > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/544.out > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/544 b/tests/xfs/544 > new file mode 100755 > index 00000000..1d586ebc > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/xfs/544 > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ > +#! /bin/bash > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# Copyright (c) 2022 Fujitsu Limited. All Rights Reserved. > +# > +# FS QA Test 544 > +# > +# Regression test for commit: > +# 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept bind mount targets") > + > +. ./common/preamble > +_begin_fstest auto dump > + > +_cleanup() > +{ > + _cleanup_dump Is this really needed? > + cd / > + rm -r -f $tmp.* > + $UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null > + rmdir $mntpnt1/dir 2> /dev/null > + $UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null > + rmdir $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null > + rmdir $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null > + [ -n "$loopdev" ] && _destroy_loop_device $loopdev > + rm -f "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile > +} > + > +# Import common functions. > +. ./common/filter > +. ./common/dump > + > +# real QA test starts here > + > +_supported_fs xfs > + > +mntpnt1=$TEST_DIR/MNT1 > +mntpnt2=$TEST_DIR/MNT2 > + > + > +# Set up > +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -s size=4096 -b size=4096 \ > + -dfile,name=$TEST_DIR/fsfile,size=8649728b,sunit=1024,swidth=2048 \ > + >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed" Are "-s size=4096 -b size=4096 -d sunit=1024,swidth=2048" necessary? If so, better to add comments to explain why they're needed. > + > +loopdev=$(_create_loop_device "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile) Is loopdev necessary? If you need mkfs, can we just use SCRATCH_DEV, and bind $SCRATCH_MNT/someonedir on $TEST_DIR/someonedir ? E.g: _cleanup() { $UMOUNT_PROG $TEST_DIR/dest 2> /dev/null cd / rm -r -f $tmp.* } _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full _scratch_mount mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/src mkdir $TEST_DIR/dest $MOUNT_PROG --bind $SCRATCH_MNT/src $TEST_DIR/dest || _fail "Bind mount failed" $XFSDUMP_PROG -L session -M test -f $tmp.dump $TEST_DIR/dest >> $seqres.full 2>&1 && \ echo "dump with bind-mounted should be failed, but passed." echo "Silence is golden" ... If you don't need mkfs, you can use $TEST_DIR (e.g. $TEST_DIR/src and $TEST_DIR/dest) to be bind mount source and target. Due to this case just trys to test xfsdump a bind mount, and make sure dump failed as expected. Am I right? Thanks, Zorro > + > +mkdir $mntpnt1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1\" failed" > + > +_mount $loopdev $mntpnt1 > +mkdir $mntpnt1/dir >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1/dir\" failed" > +mkdir $mntpnt2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt2\" failed" > + > + > +# Test > +echo "*** dump with bind-mounted test ***" >> $seqres.full > + > +mount -o bind $mntpnt1/dir $mntpnt2 > + > +$XFSDUMP_PROG -L session -M test -f $tmp.dump $mntpnt2 \ > + >> $seqres.full 2>&1 && echo "dump with bind-mounted should be failed, but passed." > + > +echo "Silence is golden" > +status=0 > +exit > diff --git a/tests/xfs/544.out b/tests/xfs/544.out > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..fc7ebff3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/xfs/544.out > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +QA output created by 544 > +Silence is golden > -- > 2.31.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: test xfsdump with bind-mounted filesystem 2022-02-16 7:07 ` Zorro Lang @ 2022-02-16 14:32 ` Masayoshi Mizuma 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2022-02-16 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fstests, Masayoshi Mizuma, linux-xfs On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 03:07:01PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:34:09PM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: > > From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> > > > > commit 25195eb ("xfsdump: handle bind mount target") introduced > > a bug of xfsdump which doesn't store the files to the dump file > > correctly when the root inode number is changed. > > > > The commit 25195eb is reverted, and commit 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept > > bind mount targets") which is in xfsdump v3.1.10 fixes the bug to reject > > the filesystem if it's bind-mounted. > > > > Test that xfsdump can reject the bind-mounted filesystem. > > > > Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> > > --- > > tests/xfs/544 | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tests/xfs/544.out | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+) > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/544 > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/544.out > > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/544 b/tests/xfs/544 > > new file mode 100755 > > index 00000000..1d586ebc > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/xfs/544 > > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ > > +#! /bin/bash > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +# Copyright (c) 2022 Fujitsu Limited. All Rights Reserved. > > +# > > +# FS QA Test 544 > > +# > > +# Regression test for commit: > > +# 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept bind mount targets") > > + > > +. ./common/preamble > > +_begin_fstest auto dump > > + > > +_cleanup() > > +{ > > + _cleanup_dump > > Is this really needed? > > > + cd / > > + rm -r -f $tmp.* > > + $UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null > > + rmdir $mntpnt1/dir 2> /dev/null > > + $UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null > > + rmdir $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null > > + rmdir $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null > > + [ -n "$loopdev" ] && _destroy_loop_device $loopdev > > + rm -f "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile > > +} > > + > > +# Import common functions. > > +. ./common/filter > > +. ./common/dump > > + > > +# real QA test starts here > > + > > +_supported_fs xfs > > + > > +mntpnt1=$TEST_DIR/MNT1 > > +mntpnt2=$TEST_DIR/MNT2 > > + > > + > > +# Set up > > +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -s size=4096 -b size=4096 \ > > + -dfile,name=$TEST_DIR/fsfile,size=8649728b,sunit=1024,swidth=2048 \ > > + >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed" > > Are "-s size=4096 -b size=4096 -d sunit=1024,swidth=2048" necessary? If so, better > to add comments to explain why they're needed. > > > + > > +loopdev=$(_create_loop_device "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile) > > Is loopdev necessary? If you need mkfs, can we just use SCRATCH_DEV, and bind $SCRATCH_MNT/someonedir > on $TEST_DIR/someonedir ? E.g: > > _cleanup() > { > $UMOUNT_PROG $TEST_DIR/dest 2> /dev/null > cd / > rm -r -f $tmp.* > } > > _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full > _scratch_mount > mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/src > mkdir $TEST_DIR/dest > $MOUNT_PROG --bind $SCRATCH_MNT/src $TEST_DIR/dest || _fail "Bind mount failed" > $XFSDUMP_PROG -L session -M test -f $tmp.dump $TEST_DIR/dest >> $seqres.full 2>&1 && \ > echo "dump with bind-mounted should be failed, but passed." > > echo "Silence is golden" > ... > > If you don't need mkfs, you can use $TEST_DIR (e.g. $TEST_DIR/src and $TEST_DIR/dest) to > be bind mount source and target. Due to this case just trys to test xfsdump a bind mount, > and make sure dump failed as expected. Am I right? Thank you for pointing it out! Yes, you're right. I'll remove the unnecessary parts and post the v2. Thanks! Masa > > Thanks, > Zorro > > > + > > +mkdir $mntpnt1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1\" failed" > > + > > +_mount $loopdev $mntpnt1 > > +mkdir $mntpnt1/dir >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1/dir\" failed" > > +mkdir $mntpnt2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt2\" failed" > > + > > + > > +# Test > > +echo "*** dump with bind-mounted test ***" >> $seqres.full > > + > > +mount -o bind $mntpnt1/dir $mntpnt2 > > + > > +$XFSDUMP_PROG -L session -M test -f $tmp.dump $mntpnt2 \ > > + >> $seqres.full 2>&1 && echo "dump with bind-mounted should be failed, but passed." > > + > > +echo "Silence is golden" > > +status=0 > > +exit > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/544.out b/tests/xfs/544.out > > new file mode 100644 > > index 00000000..fc7ebff3 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/xfs/544.out > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > > +QA output created by 544 > > +Silence is golden > > -- > > 2.31.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-16 14:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-02-14 20:34 [PATCH] xfs: test xfsdump with bind-mounted filesystem Masayoshi Mizuma 2022-02-16 7:07 ` Zorro Lang 2022-02-16 14:32 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox