* Re: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102!
[not found] <CA+6OtaV5AJEFnP8tuvsyJ07zYzaTGjVO6rk_hLUHqDH-fQrF+A@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2022-06-24 18:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2022-06-24 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chandan Babu R; +Cc: linux-xfs, linux-kernel, Ayushman Dutta, syzkaller
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 11:31:41AM -0500, Ayushman Dutta wrote:
> Linux revision: b13baccc3850ca8b8cccbf8ed9912dbaa0fdf7f3
> Linux version: v5.19-rc2
>
> Syzkaller Dashboard report:
>
> XFS: Assertion failed: !(flags & ~XFS_INOBT_WALK_FLAGS_ALL), file:
> fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c, line: 761
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
> CPU: 1 PID: 22646 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc2 #1
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:assfail+0x7f/0x8f fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102
> Code: 7f 10 84 d2 74 0c 48 c7 c7 d0 be 1e b8 e8 00 80 78 fd 8a 1d 4a
> b7 3e 01 31 ff 89 de e8 a1 68 44 fd 84 db 74 07 e8 18 6c 44 fd <0f> 0b
> e8 11 6c 44 fd 0f 0b 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 e8 03 6c 44 fd 48
> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000dcb77d8 EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: 00000000000005c3 RBX: ffffffffb75a1201 RCX: ffffffff84000798
> RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffc9000518a000 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88806cf4374f
> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffb75a1600
> R13: 00000000000002f9 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffffc9000dcb7a10
> FS: 00007f74ab8e3640(0000) GS:ffff88806cf00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000001b2de24000 CR3: 000000001ba2e000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> PKRU: 55555554
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> xfs_inobt_walk+0x3e3/0x470 fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c:761
> xfs_inumbers+0x28e/0x3a0 fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c:423
> xfs_ioc_inumbers.constprop.0+0x1a5/0x270 fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c:916
INUMBERS, eh? I bet this reproducer calls INUMBERS with
XFS_BULK_IREQ_NREXT64, which doesn't make any sense for INUMBERS and
thus triggers the ASSERT.
Chandan: Any thoughts?
> xfs_file_ioctl+0x1350/0x1d00 fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c:1925
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> RIP: 0033:0x7f74ac16f92d
> Code: 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48
> 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d
> 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f74ab8e3028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f74ac28ff60 RCX: 00007f74ac16f92d
> RDX: 00000000200000c0 RSI: 0000000080405880 RDI: 0000000000000004
> SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=4 nlmsg_type=0
> sclass=netlink_tcpdiag_socket pid=22661 comm=syz-executor.4
> RBP: 00007f74ac1e0070 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 00007f74ac28ff60 R15: 00007f74ab8c3000
> SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=4 nlmsg_type=0
> sclass=netlink_tcpdiag_socket pid=22661 comm=syz-executor.4
> </TASK>
> Modules linked in:
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> RIP: 0010:assfail+0x7f/0x8f fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102
> Code: 7f 10 84 d2 74 0c 48 c7 c7 d0 be 1e b8 e8 00 80 78 fd 8a 1d 4a
> b7 3e 01 31 ff 89 de e8 a1 68 44 fd 84 db 74 07 e8 18 6c 44 fd <0f> 0b
> e8 11 6c 44 fd 0f 0b 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 e8 03 6c 44 fd 48
> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000dcb77d8 EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: 00000000000005c3 RBX: ffffffffb75a1201 RCX: ffffffff84000798
> RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffc9000518a000 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88806cf4374f
> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffb75a1600
> R13: 00000000000002f9 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffffc9000dcb7a10
> FS: 00007f74ab8e3640(0000) GS:ffff88806cf00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000001b2de24000 CR3: 000000001ba2e000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> PKRU: 55555554
>
>
>
> Syzkaller repro.txt
>
> r0 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file0\x00', 0x26e1, 0x0)
>
> ioctl$XFS_IOC_SCRUB_METADATA(r0, 0x80405880, &(0x7f00000000c0)={0xc,
> 0x0, 0x4, 0x221})
>
>
>
> Syzkaller repro.c
>
> // autogenerated by syzkaller (https://github.com/google/syzkaller)
>
>
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
>
>
> #include <endian.h>
>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> #include <string.h>
>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
>
> #include <sys/types.h>
>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
>
> uint64_t r[1] = {0xffffffffffffffff};
>
>
> int main(void)
>
> {
>
> syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x1ffff000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
>
> syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x1000000ul, 7ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
>
> syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x21000000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
>
> intptr_t res = 0;
>
> memcpy((void*)0x20000040, "./file0\000", 8);
>
> res = syscall(__NR_openat, 0xffffff9c, 0x20000040ul, 0x26e1ul, 0ul);
>
> if (res != -1)
>
> r[0] = res;
>
> *(uint32_t*)0x200000c0 = 0xc;
>
> *(uint32_t*)0x200000c4 = 0;
>
> *(uint32_t*)0x200000c8 = 4;
"Google sentient AI still too stupid to provide ioctl structure paramter
decoding..."
--D
>
> *(uint32_t*)0x200000cc = 0x221;
>
> *(uint32_t*)0x200000d0 = 0;
>
> *(uint64_t*)0x200000d8 = 0;
>
> syscall(__NR_ioctl, r[0], 0x80405880, 0x200000c0ul);
>
> return 0;
>
> }
>
> Config file attached.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread