* [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary()
@ 2025-12-17 16:34 Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-18 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2025-12-17 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: ritesh.list, ojaswin, djwong, hch, nirjhar.roy.lists
xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code
instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is
xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error.
Fixes: e94b53ff699c ("xfs: cache last bitmap block in realtime allocator")
Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7
---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
index 6907e871fa15..bc88b965e909 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ xfs_rtcopy_summary(
error = 0;
out:
xfs_rtbuf_cache_relse(oargs);
- return 0;
+ return error;
}
/*
* Mark an extent specified by start and len allocated.
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary()
2025-12-17 16:34 [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary() Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
@ 2025-12-18 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-12 6:13 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2025-12-18 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, djwong, hch
On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:04:32PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code
> instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is
> xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error.
>
> Fixes: e94b53ff699c ("xfs: cache last bitmap block in realtime allocator")
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary()
2025-12-18 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-01-12 6:13 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-12 8:10 ` Carlos Maiolino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-01-12 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, djwong
On 12/18/25 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:04:32PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code
>> instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is
>> xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error.
>>
>> Fixes: e94b53ff699c ("xfs: cache last bitmap block in realtime allocator")
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7
> Looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Hi Carlos,
Are this and [1] getting picked up?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTFWJrOYXEeFX1kY@infradead.org/
--NR
>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary()
2026-01-12 6:13 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
@ 2026-01-12 8:10 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-01-12 8:40 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-01-12 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, djwong
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:43:53AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>
> On 12/18/25 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:04:32PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code
> > > instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is
> > > xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error.
> > >
> > > Fixes: e94b53ff699c ("xfs: cache last bitmap block in realtime allocator")
> > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7
> > Looks good:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Are this and [1] getting picked up?
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTFWJrOYXEeFX1kY@infradead.org/
Hello.
I can't find a new version on my mbox. Christoph asked you to fix the
commit log on the patch you mentioned.
If you sent a new version and I missed it, please let me know.
Carlos
>
> --NR
>
> >
> --
> Nirjhar Roy
> Linux Kernel Developer
> IBM, Bangalore
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary()
2026-01-12 8:10 ` Carlos Maiolino
@ 2026-01-12 8:40 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-12 9:56 ` Carlos Maiolino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-01-12 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: linux-xfs
On 1/12/26 13:40, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:43:53AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> On 12/18/25 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:04:32PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>> xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code
>>>> instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is
>>>> xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: e94b53ff699c ("xfs: cache last bitmap block in realtime allocator")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7
>>> Looks good:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Are this and [1] getting picked up?
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTFWJrOYXEeFX1kY@infradead.org/
> Hello.
>
> I can't find a new version on my mbox. Christoph asked you to fix the
> commit log on the patch you mentioned.
>
> If you sent a new version and I missed it, please let me know.
Sorry, I have re-sent it now [1]. Anything about [2]?
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/9b2e055a1e714dacf37b4479e2aab589f3cec7f6.1768205975.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aUONoL924Sw_su9J@infradead.org/
--NR
>
> Carlos
>
>> --NR
>>
>> --
>> Nirjhar Roy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>> IBM, Bangalore
>>
>>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary()
2026-01-12 8:40 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
@ 2026-01-12 9:56 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-01-12 10:08 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-01-12 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: linux-xfs
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 02:10:01PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>
> On 1/12/26 13:40, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:43:53AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > On 12/18/25 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:04:32PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > > > xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code
> > > > > instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is
> > > > > xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: e94b53ff699c ("xfs: cache last bitmap block in realtime allocator")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7
> > > > Looks good:
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Are this and [1] getting picked up?
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTFWJrOYXEeFX1kY@infradead.org/
> > Hello.
> >
> > I can't find a new version on my mbox. Christoph asked you to fix the
> > commit log on the patch you mentioned.
> >
> > If you sent a new version and I missed it, please let me know.
>
> Sorry, I have re-sent it now [1]. Anything about [2]?
I think think it slipped through the cracks, could you please re-send
it? I'll pick both this week.
Carlos
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/9b2e055a1e714dacf37b4479e2aab589f3cec7f6.1768205975.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
>
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aUONoL924Sw_su9J@infradead.org/
>
> --NR
>
> >
> > Carlos
> > > --NR
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nirjhar Roy
> > > Linux Kernel Developer
> > > IBM, Bangalore
> > >
> > >
> --
> Nirjhar Roy
> Linux Kernel Developer
> IBM, Bangalore
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary()
2026-01-12 9:56 ` Carlos Maiolino
@ 2026-01-12 10:08 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-01-12 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: linux-xfs
On 1/12/26 15:26, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 02:10:01PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> On 1/12/26 13:40, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:43:53AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/25 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:04:32PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>>>> xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code
>>>>>> instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is
>>>>>> xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: e94b53ff699c ("xfs: cache last bitmap block in realtime allocator")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
>>>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7
>>>>> Looks good:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>
>>>> Are this and [1] getting picked up?
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTFWJrOYXEeFX1kY@infradead.org/
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I can't find a new version on my mbox. Christoph asked you to fix the
>>> commit log on the patch you mentioned.
>>>
>>> If you sent a new version and I missed it, please let me know.
>> Sorry, I have re-sent it now [1]. Anything about [2]?
> I think think it slipped through the cracks, could you please re-send
> it? I'll pick both this week.
Sure, no problem. I have re-sent both [1] and [2].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/587bff140dc86fec629cd41db0af8c00fb9623d0.1768212233.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/9b2e055a1e714dacf37b4479e2aab589f3cec7f6.1768205975.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
--NR
>
> Carlos
>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/9b2e055a1e714dacf37b4479e2aab589f3cec7f6.1768205975.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
>>
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aUONoL924Sw_su9J@infradead.org/
>>
>> --NR
>>
>>> Carlos
>>>> --NR
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nirjhar Roy
>>>> Linux Kernel Developer
>>>> IBM, Bangalore
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Nirjhar Roy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>> IBM, Bangalore
>>
>>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-12 10:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-17 16:34 [PATCH v3] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary() Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-18 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-12 6:13 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-12 8:10 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-01-12 8:40 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-12 9:56 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-01-12 10:08 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox