From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: improve RT geometry validation
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 14:17:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afyAzghWC9_lwf13@andromeda.toxiclabs.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507052543.1305129-1-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 07:25:35AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Make sure the rtgcount is plausible for the given RT group size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index 47322adb7690..c0354f43704f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -302,17 +302,25 @@ xfs_validate_rt_geometry(
> return false;
>
> if (xfs_sb_is_v5(sbp) &&
> - (sbp->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED)) {
> + (sbp->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR)) {
> + uint64_t nr_rgs;
> uint32_t mod;
>
> /*
> - * Zoned RT devices must be aligned to the RT group size,
> - * because garbage collection assumes that all zones have the
> - * same size to avoid insane complexity if that weren't the
> - * case.
> + * Check that the number of rgcounts is plausible for the RG
> + * size.
> + */
> + nr_rgs = div_u64_rem(sbp->sb_rextents, sbp->sb_rgextents, &mod);
> + if (nr_rgs != sbp->sb_rgcount + !!mod)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Zoned RT devices must be aligned to the RT group size because
> + * garbage collection assumes that all zones have the same size
> + * to avoid insane complexity if that weren't the case.
> */
> - div_u64_rem(sbp->sb_rextents, sbp->sb_rgextents, &mod);
> - if (mod)
> + if ((sbp->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) &&
> + mod > 0)
> return false;
> }
Looks good
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <wV6uRtt8Mdv0dR-Ory4pMu4E-SDYDmUrTwaPRauY7S4lM07r4ogMmp38xxeF3FNG3X_E46ujDJHX94Lq_Oe-Vg==@protonmail.internalid>
2026-05-07 5:25 ` [PATCH] xfs: improve RT geometry validation Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-07 12:17 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]
2026-05-07 17:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-08 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-09 0:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afyAzghWC9_lwf13@andromeda.toxiclabs.cc \
--to=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox