From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: eeh bug
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:59:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179377946.32247.281.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179377184.32247.274.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 14:46 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linas !
>
> While debugging some other issues, I had a couple of oopses caused by
> what looks like a bug in EEH:
>
> When an RTAS PCI config space call returns all f's, we do an eeh error
> check by calling eeh_dn_check_failure(pdn->node, NULL);
>
> The problem is that second argument... NULL for the pci_dev *. It looks
> like the EEH code will try to printk pci_name of that and later on
> dereference it within eehd, thus causing an oops.
Ok, so I just added a
if (dev == NULL)
dev = pdn->pcidev;
To eeh_dn_check_failure(), and that fixes one of the NULL (name
printing), but I get another one a bit later, in pci_find_capability
called from eeh_slot_error_detail called from handle_eeh_events.
(Probably in gather_pci_data).
One thing that looks suspicions is that just before that I see:
EEH: of node=/pci/@8000000200000d3/pci@2,4
Which is not a device but the bridge above it... not sure why, maybe we
have a NULL pdn->pcidev at that level.. we should probably not sure
pci_find_capability in that code anyway and implent our own version
using RTAS in case we don't have a pci_dev around, don't you think ?
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-17 4:46 eeh bug Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-17 4:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-05-17 16:44 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-05-17 22:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1179377946.32247.281.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox