[PATCH] efp: Fix efp dependence

[PATCH] efp: Fix efp dependence

[Liu Yu]

There is no dependece between efp and math-emu.
But when disalbe math-emu, the efp code cannot be built.
This patch fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
---
It would be nice to see this patch go along with 2.6.29

 arch/powerpc/Makefile          |    4 ++--
 arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile |    5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
index 72d17f5..551fc58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
@@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ core-y				+= arch/powerpc/kernel/ \
 				   arch/powerpc/mm/ \
 				   arch/powerpc/lib/ \
 				   arch/powerpc/sysdev/ \
-				   arch/powerpc/platforms/
-core-$(CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION)	+= arch/powerpc/math-emu/
+				   arch/powerpc/platforms/ \
+				   arch/powerpc/math-emu/
 core-$(CONFIG_XMON)		+= arch/powerpc/xmon/
 core-$(CONFIG_KVM) 		+= arch/powerpc/kvm/
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
index f9e506a..0c16ab9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
 
-obj-y				:= math.o fmr.o lfd.o stfd.o
-
 obj-$(CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION)	+= fabs.o fadd.o fadds.o fcmpo.o fcmpu.o \
 					fctiw.o fctiwz.o fdiv.o fdivs.o \
 					fmadd.o fmadds.o fmsub.o fmsubs.o \
@@ -9,7 +7,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION)	+= fabs.o fadd.o fadds.o fcmpo.o fcmpu.o \
 					fres.o frsp.o frsqrte.o fsel.o lfs.o \
 					fsqrt.o	fsqrts.o fsub.o fsubs.o \
 					mcrfs.o mffs.o mtfsb0.o mtfsb1.o \
-					mtfsf.o mtfsfi.o stfiwx.o stfs.o
+					mtfsf.o mtfsfi.o stfiwx.o stfs.o \
+					math.o fmr.o lfd.o stfd.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPE)		+= math_efp.o
 
-- 
1.5.4

Re: [PATCH] efp: Fix efp dependence

[Kumar Gala]

On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:09 PM, Liu Yu wrote:

> There is no dependece between efp and math-emu.
> But when disalbe math-emu, the efp code cannot be built.
> This patch fixes it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
> ---
> It would be nice to see this patch go along with 2.6.29

not critical enough for .29.  applied to next for .30

(you can always ask for it get pulled in for .29.1)

- k