ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Kevin B. Hendricks]

Hi,

I just bought an ATI Radeon 32M PCI video card (with dvi output) so that I
could connect up a new Apple 17" flat panel display to my old B+W G3.

(dual video cards)

Any chance these are supported under PPC Linux?

What kernels and XFree86 versions support ATI Radeon 32Meg PCI cards?

What about Apple flat panel displays?

Thanks,

Kevin

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Kaoru Fukui]

From: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>
To: yellowdog-devel@lists.yellowdoglinux.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 08:28:52 -0400


>
> Any chance these are supported under PPC Linux?
>
> What kernels and XFree86 versions support ATI Radeon 32Meg PCI cards?


Ben's kernel and also current XFree86 have Radeon support.

Kaoru

>
> What about Apple flat panel displays?
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Kevin B. Hendricks]

Hi,

Thanks!

I will give them a try.

Kevin

On October 6, 2001 08:29, Kaoru Fukui wrote:
> From: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>
> To: yellowdog-devel@lists.yellowdoglinux.com,
> linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17
> Flat panel on B+W G3
> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 08:28:52 -0400
>
> > Any chance these are supported under PPC Linux?
> >
> > What kernels and XFree86 versions support ATI Radeon 32Meg PCI cards?
>
> Ben's kernel and also current XFree86 have Radeon support.
>
> Kaoru
>
> > What about Apple flat panel displays?

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Tom Rini]

On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 11:58:37AM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:

> I will give them a try.

Radeon framebuffer support is also in -linus finally, so all of the
trees should support it.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>> I will give them a try.
>
>Radeon framebuffer support is also in -linus finally, so all of the
>trees should support it.

The version in -linus is slightly outdated afaik. Also, you may have
to do the usual tweak to get the PLL right ;) (very similar to r128).

Ani and I have found some ways to fix that PLL issues once for all
(basically, we have some code to really probe the refclk), and afaik,
ATI OF drivers for radeon will actually give that info in the device
tree (finally !).

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Kevin B. Hendricks]

Hi Ben,

> Ani and I have found some ways to fix that PLL issues once for all
> (basically, we have some code to really probe the refclk), and afaik,
> ATI OF drivers for radeon will actually give that info in the device
> tree (finally !).

If you send that patch along, I would be happy to test it for you.

Thanks,

Kevin

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Ani Joshi]

Hi Kevin,

Ben's kernel tree has a relatively recent version of radeonfb, I will
send out an updated newer version in a couple days.  As for X, you can
build 4.1.0 and apply the patch I have in my dir on ftp.linuxppc.org
(users/ajoshi/radeon) or you can build X cvs which has my fixes applied.
DRI support is still in progress.

Flat panel support in radeonfb will be nice, I will try and send you some
code over for that as I do not have a flat panel display.


ani


On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I just bought an ATI Radeon 32M PCI video card (with dvi output) so that I
> could connect up a new Apple 17" flat panel display to my old B+W G3.
>
> (dual video cards)
>
> Any chance these are supported under PPC Linux?
>
> What kernels and XFree86 versions support ATI Radeon 32Meg PCI cards?
>
> What about Apple flat panel displays?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Kevin B. Hendricks]

Hi Ani,

Fire any patches my way and I will test them all.

Unfortunately, I am having trouble with my scsi controller under 2.4.X
kernels so I will have to solve that first (my linux fs is all on external
scsi drives).

I will let you know when I finally get a working 2.4.X kernel and can
start debugging flat panel support on the Radeon.

Thanks,

Kevin

On October 6, 2001 09:37, Ani Joshi wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Ben's kernel tree has a relatively recent version of radeonfb, I will
> send out an updated newer version in a couple days.  As for X, you can
> build 4.1.0 and apply the patch I have in my dir on ftp.linuxppc.org
> (users/ajoshi/radeon) or you can build X cvs which has my fixes applied.
> DRI support is still in progress.
>
> Flat panel support in radeonfb will be nice, I will try and send you
> some code over for that as I do not have a flat panel display.
>
>
> ani
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just bought an ATI Radeon 32M PCI video card (with dvi output) so
> > that I could connect up a new Apple 17" flat panel display to my old
> > B+W G3.
> >
> > (dual video cards)
> >
> > Any chance these are supported under PPC Linux?
> >
> > What kernels and XFree86 versions support ATI Radeon 32Meg PCI cards?
> >
> > What about Apple flat panel displays?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kevin
> >

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ATI Radeon 32MB PCI, Apple 17 Flat panel on B+W G3

[Gregorio Gervasio Jr.]

>>>>> On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 18:37:24 -0700 (PDT), Ani Joshi <ajoshi@shell.unixbox.com> said:

a> Ben's kernel tree has a relatively recent version of radeonfb, I will
a> send out an updated newer version in a couple days.  As for X, you can
a> build 4.1.0 and apply the patch I have in my dir on ftp.linuxppc.org
a> (users/ajoshi/radeon) or you can build X cvs which has my fixes applied.
a> DRI support is still in progress.

a> Flat panel support in radeonfb will be nice, I will try and send you some
a> code over for that as I do not have a flat panel display.

        What is supposed to be missing as far as flat panel support is
concerned?  I just got the same Radeon card connected to a Samsung
flat panel and it seems to work (in digital mode).  I'm using Ben's
rsync kernel (2.4.11-pre4-ben0) with Fukui-san's XFree86 4.1.99
RPM's. I have an old world machine though, so I use BootX to boot.

        By the way, how do you specify the video mode at boot time?  I
had to change the default video mode in radeonfb.c to 1280x1024-8@61
since the Samsung doesn't seem to like 640x480-8@60.
--
Gregorio Gervasio, Jr.
gtgj@pacbell.net

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

do we need -fPIC for X11R6 modules

[Kevin B. Hendricks]

Hi Ani,

Quick question.  Should we be building X11R6 modules with -fPIC?  When I
try, the resulting modules generate lots of unresolved symbols (like
"fixup", etc).

What exactly are X11R6 modules?  Are they shared libraries?  If so, they
should be built using -fPIC?  If they are not shared libraries, how are
they "loaded" and "linked" in?

If they are "loaded and linked" into a normal shared library, then -fPIC
should be used anyway.

I guess I don't understand how a load-on-demand module can be created
without -fPIC.

Any guidance you (or anyone else :-) might provide would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks,

Kevin


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: do we need -fPIC for X11R6 modules

[Paul Mackerras]

Kevin B. Hendricks writes:

> Quick question.  Should we be building X11R6 modules with -fPIC?  When I
> try, the resulting modules generate lots of unresolved symbols (like
> "fixup", etc).

I assume you mean XFree86 modules?

> What exactly are X11R6 modules?  Are they shared libraries?  If so, they
> should be built using -fPIC?  If they are not shared libraries, how are
> they "loaded" and "linked" in?

No, they are ordinary object files, which get loaded and linked into
the running XFree86 server process using linker code that is included
in the XFree86 server.  That is, the server mallocs some memory, reads
in the text and data and other stuff, processes the relocations, and
puts the symbols into its internal symbol table.

That means that for code in XFree86 to call a procedure in a module,
it has to do an explicit "lookup symbol" function call to get the
address of the procedure and then an indirect function call.

So no, we don't want -fPIC.  That introduces a whole new and different
set of relocations into the object file and I would be surprised if
the XFree86 loader knew how to deal with them.

Paul.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/