* bk trees broken?
@ 2002-03-29 15:53 Gavin Hemphill
2002-03-29 15:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-03-29 16:13 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Hemphill @ 2002-03-29 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Are there problems with the bk trees for linuxppc_2_4 and linuxppc-2.5.
I've been getting error messages "ERROR-Lock fail: possible permission
problem." on them for the last few days. I've made sure I'm running the
latest bk (BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre3 20020328212052 for
powerpc-glibc21-linux) and even tried re-cloning the repositories. The
linuxppc_2_4_devel tree seems to work fine.
G++
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bk trees broken?
2002-03-29 15:53 bk trees broken? Gavin Hemphill
@ 2002-03-29 15:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-03-29 16:13 ` Tom Rini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2002-03-29 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gavin Hemphill; +Cc: Linux/PPC Development
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Gavin Hemphill wrote:
> Are there problems with the bk trees for linuxppc_2_4 and linuxppc-2.5.
> I've been getting error messages "ERROR-Lock fail: possible permission
> problem." on them for the last few days. I've made sure I'm running the
> latest bk (BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre3 20020328212052 for
> powerpc-glibc21-linux) and even tried re-cloning the repositories. The
> linuxppc_2_4_devel tree seems to work fine.
A disk diead at BitMover, cfr. the postings on linux-kernel. Will be fixed soon
(hopefully).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: bk trees broken?
2002-03-29 15:53 bk trees broken? Gavin Hemphill
2002-03-29 15:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2002-03-29 16:13 ` Tom Rini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2002-03-29 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gavin Hemphill; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 11:53:18AM -0400, Gavin Hemphill wrote:
> Are there problems with the bk trees for linuxppc_2_4 and linuxppc-2.5.
> I've been getting error messages "ERROR-Lock fail: possible permission
> problem." on them for the last few days. I've made sure I'm running the
> latest bk (BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre3 20020328212052 for
> powerpc-glibc21-linux) and even tried re-cloning the repositories. The
> linuxppc_2_4_devel tree seems to work fine.
BitMover lost a disk a few days ago. If this is still a problem, please
email support@bitmover.com, or use the BK mirrors on source.mvista.com.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-29 16:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-29 15:53 bk trees broken? Gavin Hemphill
2002-03-29 15:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-03-29 16:13 ` Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox