From: Lutz Jaenicke <ljaenicke@innominate.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: MPC8313 performance evaluation
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:48:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090807074801.GA19763@lutz.bln.innominate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8731B515-14B1-4580-A196-75E57543C3F9@kernel.crashing.org>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:16:55PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>> With the MPC8343@400MHz I get a throughput of approx. 24500 frames/s
>> using the predefined firewall rules.
>> With the MPC8313 I get a significantly lower value:
>> MPC8313@250MHz 12500fps
>> MPC8313@333MHz 14500fps
>> MPC8313@416MHz 15500fps (333MHz type, overclocked)
> What DDR frequencies (and width) are you running the 8343 vs 8313 at.
> This can have a significant impact on performance.
The 8343 is running DDR2 32bit at 266MHz (CSB 266MHz)
The 8313 is running DDR2 32bit at 333MHz (CSB 166MHz)
The test were performed with 128byte frames so that the overall
bandwidth needed is far below even 100Mbit/s.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Dr.-Ing. Lutz Jänicke
CTO
Innominate Security Technologies AG /protecting industrial networks/
tel: +49.30.921028-200
fax: +49.30.921028-020
Rudower Chaussee 13
D-12489 Berlin, Germany
www.innominate.com
Register Court: AG Charlottenburg, HR B 81603
Management Board: Dirk Seewald
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Volker Bibelhausen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-06 18:00 MPC8313 performance evaluation Lutz Jaenicke
2009-08-06 19:16 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-07 7:48 ` Lutz Jaenicke [this message]
2009-08-07 8:05 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-08-07 8:08 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-08-07 10:56 ` Lutz Jaenicke
2009-08-07 11:02 ` Lutz Jaenicke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090807074801.GA19763@lutz.bln.innominate.local \
--to=ljaenicke@innominate.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox