From: Lutz Jaenicke <ljaenicke@innominate.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: MPC8313 performance evaluation
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:56:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090807105654.GA20678@lutz.bln.innominate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D7CCA83BB0796C49BC0BB53B6AB1208956D03F@zch01exm21.fsl.freescale.net>
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:08:50PM +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
>
> > Some discussion with the the freescale rep. lead to the CSB frequency
> > of the 8313 (166MHz) being significantly lower than that of the 8343.
> > Is the CSB the critical point here?
>
> I believe the CSB is critical point here. They are right.
I have performed some additional measurements with other multiplier/divider
settings
Previous values with CSB=166MHz
> >> With the MPC8313 I get a significantly lower value:
> >> MPC8313@250MHz 12500fps
> >> MPC8313@333MHz 14500fps
> >> MPC8313@416MHz 15500fps (333MHz type, overclocked)
New value with CSB=200MHz (overclocked)
MPC8313@400MHz 17500fps
This indeed indicates that the CSB is the limiting factor.
Until a few days ago I have not even been aware of the CSB being a
performance critical component. All of the nice powerpoints explaining
the processors and used for comparing different families shown by the
Freescale Rep include the core frequencies and the DRAM interface
and frequency but do not even mention the CSB...
> > Note: the IXP42x uses an internal bus speed of 133MHz and operates
> > at frame rates similar to the 8343...
>
> It is possible, IXP42x has the differenet SoC architecture with 83xx.
That is very true indeed, then XScale (ARM) based IXP42x does have
a completely different implementation.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Dr.-Ing. Lutz Jänicke
CTO
Innominate Security Technologies AG /protecting industrial networks/
tel: +49.30.921028-200
fax: +49.30.921028-020
Rudower Chaussee 13
D-12489 Berlin, Germany
www.innominate.com
Register Court: AG Charlottenburg, HR B 81603
Management Board: Dirk Seewald
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Volker Bibelhausen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-06 18:00 MPC8313 performance evaluation Lutz Jaenicke
2009-08-06 19:16 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-07 7:48 ` Lutz Jaenicke
2009-08-07 8:05 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-08-07 8:08 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-08-07 10:56 ` Lutz Jaenicke [this message]
2009-08-07 11:02 ` Lutz Jaenicke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090807105654.GA20678@lutz.bln.innominate.local \
--to=ljaenicke@innominate.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox