* [PATCH 01/13] 8xx: Use a macro to simpliy CPU6 errata code.
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 02/13] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions Joakim Tjernlund
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 84 +++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index f9a30f3..ba05a57 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -31,6 +31,15 @@
#include <asm/ppc_asm.h>
#include "ppc_defs.h"
+/* Macro to make the code more readable. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
+ #define DO_8xx_CPU6(val, reg) \
+ li reg, val; \
+ stw reg, 12(r0); \
+ lwz reg, 12(r0);
+#else
+ #define DO_8xx_CPU6(val, reg)
+#endif
.text
.globl _stext
_stext:
@@ -310,20 +319,14 @@ SystemCall:
InstructionTLBMiss:
#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
stw r3, 8(r0)
- li r3, 0x3f80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3f80, r3)
mtspr M_TW, r20 /* Save a couple of working registers */
mfcr r20
stw r20, 0(r0)
stw r21, 4(r0)
mfspr r20, SRR0 /* Get effective address of fault */
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3780
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3780, r3)
mtspr MD_EPN, r20 /* Have to use MD_EPN for walk, MI_EPN can't */
mfspr r20, M_TWB /* Get level 1 table entry address */
@@ -345,17 +348,9 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
tophys(r21,r21)
ori r21,r21,1 /* Set valid bit */
beq- 2f /* If zero, don't try to find a pte */
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x2b80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x2b80, r3)
mtspr MI_TWC, r21 /* Set segment attributes */
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3b80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
@@ -371,12 +366,7 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
*/
2: li r21, 0x00f0
rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x2d80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x2d80, r3)
mtspr MI_RPN, r20 /* Update TLB entry */
mfspr r20, M_TW /* Restore registers */
@@ -392,10 +382,8 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
DataStoreTLBMiss:
#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
stw r3, 8(r0)
- li r3, 0x3f80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3f80, r3)
mtspr M_TW, r20 /* Save a couple of working registers */
mfcr r20
stw r20, 0(r0)
@@ -419,11 +407,7 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
tophys(r21, r21)
ori r21, r21, 1 /* Set valid bit in physical L2 page */
beq- 2f /* If zero, don't try to find a pte */
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3b80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
mfspr r20, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
lwz r20, 0(r20) /* Get the pte */
@@ -435,11 +419,7 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
* above.
*/
rlwimi r21, r20, 0, 27, 27
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3b80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* get the pte address again */
@@ -454,12 +434,7 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
*/
2: li r21, 0x00f0
rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3d80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
mtspr MD_RPN, r20 /* Update TLB entry */
mfspr r20, M_TW /* Restore registers */
@@ -491,10 +466,8 @@ InstructionTLBError:
DataTLBError:
#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
stw r3, 8(r0)
- li r3, 0x3f80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3f80, r3)
mtspr M_TW, r20 /* Save a couple of working registers */
mfcr r20
stw r20, 0(r0)
@@ -527,11 +500,7 @@ DataTLBError:
ori r21, r21, MD_EVALID
mfspr r20, M_CASID
rlwimi r21, r20, 0, 28, 31
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3780
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3780, r3)
mtspr MD_EPN, r21
mfspr r20, M_TWB /* Get level 1 table entry address */
@@ -553,11 +522,7 @@ DataTLBError:
*/
tophys(r21, r21)
ori r21, r21, 1 /* Set valid bit in physical L2 page */
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3b80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
@@ -579,12 +544,7 @@ DataTLBError:
*/
li r21, 0x00f0
rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- li r3, 0x3d80
- stw r3, 12(r0)
- lwz r3, 12(r0)
-#endif
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
mtspr MD_RPN, r20 /* Update TLB entry */
mfspr r20, M_TW /* Restore registers */
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/13] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions.
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 01/13] 8xx: Use a macro to simpliy CPU6 errata code Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 03/13] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs Joakim Tjernlund
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
dcbz, dcbf, dcbi, dcbst and icbi do not set DAR when they
cause a DTLB Error. Dectect this by tagging DAR with 0x00f0
at every exception exit that modifies DAR.
This also fixes MachineCheck to pass DAR and DSISR as well.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index ba05a57..57858ce 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -197,7 +197,17 @@ label: \
STD_EXCEPTION(0x100, Reset, UnknownException)
/* Machine check */
- STD_EXCEPTION(0x200, MachineCheck, MachineCheckException)
+ . = 0x200
+MachineCheck:
+ EXCEPTION_PROLOG
+ mfspr r20,DSISR
+ stw r20,_DSISR(r21)
+ mfspr r20,DAR
+ stw r20,_DAR(r21)
+ li r20,0x00f0
+ mtspr DAR,r20 /* Tag DAR */
+ addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
+ FINISH_EXCEPTION(MachineCheckException)
/* Data access exception.
* This is "never generated" by the MPC8xx. We jump to it for other
@@ -211,6 +221,8 @@ DataAccess:
mr r5,r20
mfspr r4,DAR
stw r4,_DAR(r21)
+ li r20,0x00f0
+ mtspr DAR,r20 /* Tag DAR */
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
li r20,MSR_KERNEL
rlwimi r20,r23,0,16,16 /* copy EE bit from saved MSR */
@@ -249,6 +261,8 @@ Alignment:
EXCEPTION_PROLOG
mfspr r4,DAR
stw r4,_DAR(r21)
+ li r20,0x00f0
+ mtspr DAR,r20 /* Tag DAR */
mfspr r5,DSISR
stw r5,_DSISR(r21)
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
@@ -433,6 +447,7 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
* of the MMU.
*/
2: li r21, 0x00f0
+ mtspr DAR, r21 /* Tag DAR */
rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
mtspr MD_RPN, r20 /* Update TLB entry */
@@ -543,6 +558,7 @@ DataTLBError:
* of the MMU.
*/
li r21, 0x00f0
+ mtspr DAR, r21 /* Tag DAR */
rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
mtspr MD_RPN, r20 /* Update TLB entry */
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 03/13] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 01/13] 8xx: Use a macro to simpliy CPU6 errata code Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 02/13] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 04/13] 8xx: Fix CONFIG_PIN_TLB Joakim Tjernlund
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
8xx sometimes need to load a invalid/non-present TLBs in
it DTLB asm handler.
These must be invalidated separaly as linux mm don't.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/mm/fault.c | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
index 9d3ce2d..874005a 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
@@ -116,7 +116,13 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
else
is_write = error_code & 0x02000000;
#endif /* CONFIG_4xx || CONFIG_BOOKE */
-
+#if defined(CONFIG_8xx)
+ /* 8xx does no invalidate TLBs that are ~PRESENT,
+ * do it here.
+ */
+ if (error_code & 0x40000000)
+ _tlbie(address);
+#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_XMON) || defined(CONFIG_KGDB)
if (debugger_fault_handler && regs->trap == 0x300) {
debugger_fault_handler(regs);
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/13] 8xx: Fix CONFIG_PIN_TLB
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 03/13] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 05/13] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects Joakim Tjernlund
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
The wrong register was loaded into MD_RPN.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 57858ce..5269e5b 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -840,13 +840,13 @@ initial_mmu:
mtspr MD_TWC, r9
li r11, MI_BOOTINIT /* Create RPN for address 0 */
addis r11, r11, 0x0080 /* Add 8M */
- mtspr MD_RPN, r8
+ mtspr MD_RPN, r11
addis r8, r8, 0x0080 /* Add 8M */
mtspr MD_EPN, r8
mtspr MD_TWC, r9
addis r11, r11, 0x0080 /* Add 8M */
- mtspr MD_RPN, r8
+ mtspr MD_RPN, r11
#endif
/* Since the cache is enabled according to the information we
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 05/13] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects.
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 04/13] 8xx: Fix CONFIG_PIN_TLB Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 06/13] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Joakim Tjernlund
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Update the TLB asm to make proper use of _PAGE_DIRTY and _PAGE_ACCESSED.
Get rid of _PAGE_HWWRITE too.
Pros:
- PRESENT is copied to ACCESSED, fixing accounting
- DIRTY is mapped to 0x100, the changed bit, and is set directly
when a page has been made dirty.
- Proper RO/RW mapping of user space.
- Free up 2 SW TLB bits in the linux pte(add back _PAGE_WRITETHRU ?)
- kernel RO/user NA support. Not sure this is really needed, would save
a few insn if not required.
Cons:
- A few more instructions in the DTLB Miss routine.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h | 15 +++++------
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 5269e5b..9eb383b 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -361,25 +361,27 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
*/
tophys(r21,r21)
ori r21,r21,1 /* Set valid bit */
- beq- 2f /* If zero, don't try to find a pte */
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x2b80, r3)
mtspr MI_TWC, r21 /* Set segment attributes */
+ beq- 2f /* If zero, don't try to find a pte */
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
- ori r20, r20, _PAGE_ACCESSED
- stw r20, 0(r21)
-
+#if 1
+ /* if !swap, you can delete this */
+ rlwimi r20, r20, 5, _PAGE_PRESENT<<5 /* Copy PRESENT to ACCESSED */
+ stw r20, 0(r21) /* Update pte */
+#endif
/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
- * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
+ * Software indicator bits 21 and 28 must be clear.
* Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
* set. All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
* of the MMU.
*/
2: li r21, 0x00f0
- rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
+ rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 0x07f8 /* Set 24-27, clear 21-23,28 */
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x2d80, r3)
mtspr MI_RPN, r20 /* Update TLB entry */
@@ -436,12 +438,25 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21
- mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* get the pte address again */
- ori r20, r20, _PAGE_ACCESSED
- stw r20, 0(r21)
+#if 1
+ /* if !swap, you can delete this */
+ mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* get the pte address */
+ rlwimi r20, r20, 5, _PAGE_PRESENT<<5 /* Copy PRESENT to ACCESSED */
+ stw r20, 0(r21) /* Update pte */
+#endif
+
+ /* Honour kernel RO, User NA */
+ /* 0x200 == Extended encoding, bit 22 */
+ /* r20 |= (r20 & _PAGE_USER) >> 2 */
+ rlwimi r20, r20, 32-2, 0x200
+ /* r21 = (r20 & _PAGE_RW) >> 1 */
+ rlwinm r21, r20, 32-1, 0x200
+ or r20, r21, r20
+ /* invert RW and 0x200 bits */
+ xori r20, r20, _PAGE_RW | 0x200
/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
- * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
+ * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
* Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
* set. All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
* of the MMU.
@@ -488,11 +503,12 @@ DataTLBError:
stw r20, 0(r0)
stw r21, 4(r0)
- /* First, make sure this was a store operation.
- */
mfspr r20, DSISR
- andis. r21, r20, 0x0200 /* If set, indicates store op */
- beq 2f
+ andis. r21, r20, 0x4800 /* !translation or protection */
+ bne- 2f
+ /* Only Change bit left now, do it here as it is faster
+ * than trapping to the C fault handler.
+ */
/* The EA of a data TLB miss is automatically stored in the MD_EPN
* register. The EA of a data TLB error is automatically stored in
@@ -542,17 +558,12 @@ DataTLBError:
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
- andi. r21, r20, _PAGE_RW /* Is it writeable? */
- beq 2f /* Bail out if not */
-
- /* Update 'changed', among others.
- */
ori r20, r20, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_HWWRITE
- mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* Get pte address again */
stw r20, 0(r21) /* and update pte in table */
+ xori r20, r20, _PAGE_RW /* RW bit is inverted */
/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
- * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
+ * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
* Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
* set. All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
* of the MMU.
diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
index 71b2165..2ba37d3 100644
--- a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
@@ -298,21 +298,20 @@ extern unsigned long vmalloc_start;
#define _PAGE_NO_CACHE 0x0002 /* I: cache inhibit */
#define _PAGE_SHARED 0x0004 /* No ASID (context) compare */
-/* These five software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
- * into the TLB.
+/* These three software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
+ * into the TLB, 2 SW bits free.
*/
#define _PAGE_EXEC 0x0008 /* software: i-cache coherency required */
#define _PAGE_GUARDED 0x0010 /* software: guarded access */
-#define _PAGE_DIRTY 0x0020 /* software: page changed */
-#define _PAGE_RW 0x0040 /* software: user write access allowed */
-#define _PAGE_ACCESSED 0x0080 /* software: page referenced */
+#define _PAGE_ACCESSED 0x0020 /* software: page referenced */
/* Setting any bits in the nibble with the follow two controls will
* require a TLB exception handler change. It is assumed unused bits
- * are always zero.
+ * are always zero, encoding(bit 22).
*/
-#define _PAGE_HWWRITE 0x0100 /* h/w write enable: never set in Linux PTE */
-#define _PAGE_USER 0x0800 /* One of the PP bits, the other is USER&~RW */
+#define _PAGE_DIRTY 0x0100 /* Changed: page changed */
+#define _PAGE_RW 0x0400 /* PP lsb(bit 21), user write access allowed */
+#define _PAGE_USER 0x0800 /* PP msb(bit 20), user access allowed */
#define _PMD_PRESENT PAGE_MASK
#define _PMD_PAGE_MASK 0x000c
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 06/13] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 05/13] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 07/13] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions Joakim Tjernlund
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
a rfi. If such code crosses a page boundary you risk a TLB miss
which will clobber SRR0/SRR1. Avoid this by always pinning
kernel instruction TLB space.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 9eb383b..d992c24 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -777,12 +777,13 @@ start_here:
*/
initial_mmu:
tlbia /* Invalidate all TLB entries */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PIN_TLB
+
+/* Always pin the first 8 MB ITLB to prevent ITLB
+ misses while mucking around with SRR0/SRR1 in asm
+*/
lis r8, MI_RSV4I@h
ori r8, r8, 0x1c00
-#else
- li r8, 0
-#endif
+
mtspr MI_CTR, r8 /* Set instruction MMU control */
#ifdef CONFIG_PIN_TLB
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 07/13] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions.
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 06/13] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 08/13] 8xx: CPU6 errata make DTLB error too big to fit Joakim Tjernlund
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
This is an assembler version to fixup DAR not being set
by dcbX, icbi instructions. There are two versions, one
uses selfmodifing code, the other uses a
jump table but is much bigger(default).
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index d992c24..52ff914 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -503,8 +503,17 @@ DataTLBError:
stw r20, 0(r0)
stw r21, 4(r0)
- mfspr r20, DSISR
- andis. r21, r20, 0x4800 /* !translation or protection */
+ mfspr r20, DAR
+ cmpwi cr0, r20, 0x00f0
+ beq- FixupDAR /* must be a buggy dcbX, icbi insn. */
+DARFixed:
+ /* As the DAR fixup may clear store we may have all 3 states zero.
+ * Make sure only 0x0200(store) falls down into DIRTY handling
+ */
+ mfspr r21, DSISR
+ andis. r21, r21, 0x4a00 /* !translation, protection or store */
+ srwi r21, r21, 16
+ cmpwi cr0, r21, 0x0200 /* just store ? */
bne- 2f
/* Only Change bit left now, do it here as it is faster
* than trapping to the C fault handler.
@@ -526,7 +535,7 @@ DataTLBError:
* are initialized in mapin_ram(). This will avoid the problem,
* assuming we only use the dcbi instruction on kernel addresses.
*/
- mfspr r20, DAR
+ /* DAR is in r20 already */
rlwinm r21, r20, 0, 0, 19
ori r21, r21, MD_EVALID
mfspr r20, M_CASID
@@ -610,6 +619,140 @@ DataTLBError:
STD_EXCEPTION(0x1f00, Trap_1f, UnknownException)
. = 0x2000
+/* This is the procedure to calculate the data EA for buggy dcbx,dcbi instructions
+ * by decoding the registers used by the dcbx instruction and adding them.
+ * DAR is set to the calculated address and r10 also holds the EA on exit.
+ */
+ /* define if you don't want to use self modifying code */
+#define NO_SELF_MODIFYING_CODE
+FixupDAR:/* Entry point for dcbx workaround. */
+ /* fetch instruction from memory. */
+ mfspr r20, SRR0
+ andis. r21, r20, 0x8000 /* Address >= 0x80000000 */
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3780, r3)
+ mtspr MD_EPN, r20
+ mfspr r21, M_TWB /* Get level 1 table entry address */
+ beq- 3f /* Branch if user space */
+ lis r21, (swapper_pg_dir-PAGE_OFFSET)@h
+ ori r21, r21, (swapper_pg_dir-PAGE_OFFSET)@l
+ rlwimi r21, r20, 32-20, 0xffc /* r21 = r21&~0xffc|(r20>>20)&0xffc */
+3: lwz r21, 0(r21) /* Get the level 1 entry */
+ tophys (r21, r21)
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
+ mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
+ mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
+ lwz r21, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
+ /* concat physical page address(r21) and page offset(r20) */
+ rlwimi r21, r20, 0, 20, 31
+ lwz r21,0(r21)
+/* Check if it really is a dcbx instruction. */
+/* dcbt and dcbtst does not generate DTLB Misses/Errors,
+ * no need to include them here */
+ srwi r20, r21, 26 /* check if major OP code is 31 */
+ cmpwi cr0, r20, 31
+ bne- 141f
+ rlwinm r20, r21, 0, 21, 30
+ cmpwi cr0, r20, 2028 /* Is dcbz? */
+ beq+ 142f
+ cmpwi cr0, r20, 940 /* Is dcbi? */
+ beq+ 142f
+ cmpwi cr0, r20, 108 /* Is dcbst? */
+ beq+ 144f /* Fix up store bit! */
+ cmpwi cr0, r20, 172 /* Is dcbf? */
+ beq+ 142f
+ cmpwi cr0, r20, 1964 /* Is icbi? */
+ beq+ 142f
+141: mfspr r20, DAR /* r20 must hold DAR at exit */
+ b DARFixed /* Nope, go back to normal TLB processing */
+
+144: mfspr r20, DSISR
+ rlwinm r20, r20,0,7,5 /* Clear store bit for buggy dcbst insn */
+ mtspr DSISR, r20
+142: /* continue, it was a dcbx, dcbi instruction. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
+ lwz r3, 8(r0) /* restore r3 from memory */
+#endif
+#ifndef NO_SELF_MODIFYING_CODE
+ andis. r20,r21,0x1f /* test if reg RA is r0 */
+ li r20,modified_instr@l
+ dcbtst r0,r20 /* touch for store */
+ rlwinm r21,r21,0,0,20 /* Zero lower 10 bits */
+ oris r21,r21,640 /* Transform instr. to a "add r20,RA,RB" */
+ ori r21,r21,532
+ stw r21,0(r20) /* store add/and instruction */
+ dcbf 0,r20 /* flush new instr. to memory. */
+ icbi 0,r20 /* invalidate instr. cache line */
+ lwz r21, 4(r0) /* restore r21 from memory */
+ mfspr r20, M_TW /* restore r20 from M_TW */
+ isync /* Wait until new instr is loaded from memory */
+modified_instr:
+ .space 4 /* this is where the add instr. is stored */
+ bne+ 143f
+ subf r20,r0,r20 /* r20=r20-r0, only if reg RA is r0 */
+143: mtdar r20 /* store faulting EA in DAR */
+ b DARFixed /* Go back to normal TLB handling */
+#else
+ mfctr r20
+ mtdar r20 /* save ctr reg in DAR */
+ rlwinm r20, r21, 24, 24, 28 /* offset into jump table for reg RB */
+ addi r20, r20, 150f@l /* add start of table */
+ mtctr r20 /* load ctr with jump address */
+ xor r20, r20, r20 /* sum starts at zero */
+ bctr /* jump into table */
+150:
+ add r20, r20, r0 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r1 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r2 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r3 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r4 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r5 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r6 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r7 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r8 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r9 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r10 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r11 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r12 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r13 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r14 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r15 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r16 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r17 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r18 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r19 ;b 151f
+ mtctr r21 ;b 154f /* r20 needs special handling */
+ mtctr r21 ;b 153f /* r21 needs special handling */
+ add r20, r20, r22 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r23 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r24 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r25 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r26 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r27 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r28 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r29 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r30 ;b 151f
+ add r20, r20, r31
+151:
+ rlwinm. r21,r21,19,24,28 /* offset into jump table for reg RA */
+ beq 152f /* if reg RA is zero, don't add it */
+ addi r21, r21, 150b@l /* add start of table */
+ mtctr r21 /* load ctr with jump address */
+ rlwinm r21,r21,0,16,10 /* make sure we don't execute this more than once */
+ bctr /* jump into table */
+152:
+ mfdar r21
+ mtctr r21 /* restore ctr reg from DAR */
+ mtdar r20 /* save fault EA to DAR */
+ b DARFixed /* Go back to normal TLB handling */
+
+ /* special handling for r20,r21 since these are modified already */
+153: lwz r21, 4(r0) /* load r21 from memory */
+ b 155f
+154: mfspr r21, M_TW /* load r20 from M_TW */
+155: add r20, r20, r21 /* add it */
+ mfctr r21 /* restore r21 */
+ b 151b
+#endif
/*
* This code finishes saving the registers to the exception frame
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 08/13] 8xx: CPU6 errata make DTLB error too big to fit.
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 07/13] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 09/13] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
branch to common code in DTLB Miss instead.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 23 ++---------------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 52ff914..0aab8ca 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
* set. All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
* of the MMU.
*/
+finish_DTLB:
2: li r21, 0x00f0
mtspr DAR, r21 /* Tag DAR */
rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
@@ -570,27 +571,7 @@ DARFixed:
ori r20, r20, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_HWWRITE
stw r20, 0(r21) /* and update pte in table */
xori r20, r20, _PAGE_RW /* RW bit is inverted */
-
- /* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
- * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
- * Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
- * set. All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
- * of the MMU.
- */
- li r21, 0x00f0
- mtspr DAR, r21 /* Tag DAR */
- rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 24, 28 /* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
- DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
- mtspr MD_RPN, r20 /* Update TLB entry */
-
- mfspr r20, M_TW /* Restore registers */
- lwz r21, 0(r0)
- mtcr r21
- lwz r21, 4(r0)
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
- lwz r3, 8(r0)
-#endif
- rfi
+ b finish_DTLB
2:
mfspr r20, M_TW /* Restore registers */
lwz r21, 0(r0)
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 09/13] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error.
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 08/13] 8xx: CPU6 errata make DTLB error too big to fit Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 10/13] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU Joakim Tjernlund
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
only DTLB Miss did set this bit, DTLB Error needs too otherwise
the setting is lost when the page becomes dirty.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 +++++++++---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 0aab8ca..2659a1e 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -565,9 +565,15 @@ DARFixed:
ori r21, r21, 1 /* Set valid bit in physical L2 page */
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
- mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
- lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
-
+ mfspr r20, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
+ lwz r20, 0(r20) /* Get the pte */
+ /* Insert the Guarded flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
+ * It is bit 27 of both the Linux PTE and the TWC
+ */
+ rlwimi r21, r20, 0, 27, 27
+ DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
+ mtspr MD_TWC, r21
+ mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* get the pte address again */
ori r20, r20, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_HWWRITE
stw r20, 0(r21) /* and update pte in table */
xori r20, r20, _PAGE_RW /* RW bit is inverted */
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 10/13] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 09/13] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 11/13] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines Joakim Tjernlund
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
8xx has not had WRITETHRU due to lack of bits in the pte.
After the recent rewrite of the 8xx TLB code, there are
two bits left. Use one of them to WRITETHRU.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 8 ++++++++
include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 2659a1e..43bccb1 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -435,6 +435,10 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
* above.
*/
rlwimi r21, r20, 0, 27, 27
+ /* Insert the WriteThru flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
+ * It is bit 25 in the Linux PTE and bit 30 in the TWC
+ */
+ rlwimi r21, r20, 32-5, 30, 30
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21
@@ -571,6 +575,10 @@ DARFixed:
* It is bit 27 of both the Linux PTE and the TWC
*/
rlwimi r21, r20, 0, 27, 27
+ /* Insert the WriteThru flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
+ * It is bit 25 in the Linux PTE and bit 30 in the TWC
+ */
+ rlwimi r21, r20, 32-5, 30, 30
DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
mtspr MD_TWC, r21
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* get the pte address again */
diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
index 2ba37d3..6cfc5fc 100644
--- a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
@@ -298,12 +298,13 @@ extern unsigned long vmalloc_start;
#define _PAGE_NO_CACHE 0x0002 /* I: cache inhibit */
#define _PAGE_SHARED 0x0004 /* No ASID (context) compare */
-/* These three software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
- * into the TLB, 2 SW bits free.
+/* These four software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
+ * into the TLB, 1 SW bits left(0x0080).
*/
#define _PAGE_EXEC 0x0008 /* software: i-cache coherency required */
#define _PAGE_GUARDED 0x0010 /* software: guarded access */
#define _PAGE_ACCESSED 0x0020 /* software: page referenced */
+#define _PAGE_WRITETHRU 0x0040 /* software: caching is write through */
/* Setting any bits in the nibble with the follow two controls will
* require a TLB exception handler change. It is assumed unused bits
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 11/13] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 10/13] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 12/13] 8xx: Optimize ITLBMiss handler Joakim Tjernlund
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Now that 8xx can fixup dcbX instructions, start using them
where possible like every other PowerPc arch do.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S | 18 ------------------
arch/ppc/lib/string.S | 17 -----------------
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S
index c1c3178..6f57957 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S
@@ -662,15 +662,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__flush_dcache_icache)
_GLOBAL(clear_page)
li r0,4096/L1_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
mtctr r0
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx
- li r4, 0
-1: stw r4, 0(r3)
- stw r4, 4(r3)
- stw r4, 8(r3)
- stw r4, 12(r3)
-#else
1: dcbz 0,r3
-#endif
addi r3,r3,L1_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
bdnz 1b
blr
@@ -695,15 +687,6 @@ _GLOBAL(copy_page)
addi r3,r3,-4
addi r4,r4,-4
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx
- /* don't use prefetch on 8xx */
- li r0,4096/L1_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
- mtctr r0
-1: COPY_16_BYTES
- bdnz 1b
- blr
-
-#else /* not 8xx, we can prefetch */
li r5,4
#if MAX_COPY_PREFETCH > 1
@@ -744,7 +727,6 @@ _GLOBAL(copy_page)
li r0,MAX_COPY_PREFETCH
li r11,4
b 2b
-#endif /* CONFIG_8xx */
/*
* Atomic [test&set] exchange
diff --git a/arch/ppc/lib/string.S b/arch/ppc/lib/string.S
index 6ca54b4..b6ea44b 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/lib/string.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/lib/string.S
@@ -159,14 +159,7 @@ _GLOBAL(cacheable_memzero)
bdnz 4b
3: mtctr r9
li r7,4
-#if !defined(CONFIG_8xx)
10: dcbz r7,r6
-#else
-10: stw r4, 4(r6)
- stw r4, 8(r6)
- stw r4, 12(r6)
- stw r4, 16(r6)
-#endif
addi r6,r6,CACHELINE_BYTES
bdnz 10b
clrlwi r5,r8,32-LG_CACHELINE_BYTES
@@ -261,9 +254,7 @@ _GLOBAL(cacheable_memcpy)
mtctr r0
beq 63f
53:
-#if !defined(CONFIG_8xx)
dcbz r11,r6
-#endif
COPY_16_BYTES
#if L1_CACHE_LINE_SIZE >= 32
COPY_16_BYTES
@@ -443,13 +434,6 @@ _GLOBAL(__copy_tofrom_user)
li r11,4
beq 63f
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx
- /* Don't use prefetch on 8xx */
- mtctr r0
-53: COPY_16_BYTES_WITHEX(0)
- bdnz 53b
-
-#else /* not CONFIG_8xx */
/* Here we decide how far ahead to prefetch the source */
li r3,4
cmpwi r0,1
@@ -502,7 +486,6 @@ _GLOBAL(__copy_tofrom_user)
li r3,4
li r7,0
bne 114b
-#endif /* CONFIG_8xx */
63: srwi. r0,r5,2
mtctr r0
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 12/13] 8xx: Optimize ITLBMiss handler.
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 11/13] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 13/13] 8xx: Optimize TLB Miss handlers Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-11 6:09 ` [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Willy Tarreau
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Don't check for kernel space if no modules.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 43bccb1..5dbbdb4 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -347,12 +347,17 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
/* If we are faulting a kernel address, we have to use the
* kernel page tables.
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+ /* Since we PIN the first 8MB text, we only get ITLB misses
+ * for modules
+ */
andi. r21, r20, 0x0800 /* Address >= 0x80000000 */
beq 3f
lis r21, swapper_pg_dir@h
ori r21, r21, swapper_pg_dir@l
rlwimi r20, r21, 0, 2, 19
3:
+#endif
lwz r21, 0(r20) /* Get the level 1 entry */
rlwinm. r20, r21,0,0,19 /* Extract page descriptor page address */
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 13/13] 8xx: Optimize TLB Miss handlers
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 12/13] 8xx: Optimize ITLBMiss handler Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-10 21:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-11 6:09 ` [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Willy Tarreau
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau, Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Only update pte w.r.t ACCESSED if it isn't already set
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 7 +++++++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 5dbbdb4..75acaa0 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -376,8 +376,12 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
#if 1
/* if !swap, you can delete this */
+ andi. r21, r20, _PAGE_ACCESSED /* test ACCESSED bit */
+ bne+ 4f /* Branch if set */
+ mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* get the pte address */
rlwimi r20, r20, 5, _PAGE_PRESENT<<5 /* Copy PRESENT to ACCESSED */
stw r20, 0(r21) /* Update pte */
+4:
#endif
/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
* Software indicator bits 21 and 28 must be clear.
@@ -449,9 +453,12 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
#if 1
/* if !swap, you can delete this */
+ andi. r21, r20, _PAGE_ACCESSED /* test ACCESSED bit */
+ bne+ 4f /* Branch if set */
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* get the pte address */
rlwimi r20, r20, 5, _PAGE_PRESENT<<5 /* Copy PRESENT to ACCESSED */
stw r20, 0(r21) /* Update pte */
+4:
#endif
/* Honour kernel RO, User NA */
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4
2011-01-10 21:37 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Joakim Tjernlund
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-10 21:37 ` [PATCH 13/13] 8xx: Optimize TLB Miss handlers Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-11 6:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-01-11 8:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund
[not found] ` <OFEC114402.5A694921-ONC1257815.002CC8F2-C1257815.002D1C7D@LocalDomain>
13 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Willy Tarreau @ 2011-01-11 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Hi Joakim,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the
> the store bit when faulting into DTLB error.
> A few more bugs very found during development.
>
> I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
> but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
Thank you very much for taking care of this, that's very much appreciated.
I'll look at this ASAP. Just a quick question in order to be certain, did
you have the opportunity to test all of these changes on real hardware ?
Thanks,
Willy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4
2011-01-11 6:09 ` [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4 Willy Tarreau
@ 2011-01-11 8:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-11 20:08 ` Willy Tarreau
[not found] ` <OFEC114402.5A694921-ONC1257815.002CC8F2-C1257815.002D1C7D@LocalDomain>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-11 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote on 2011/01/11 07:09:26:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> > bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> > error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> > tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the
> > the store bit when faulting into DTLB error.
> > A few more bugs very found during development.
> >
> > I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
> > but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
>
> Thank you very much for taking care of this, that's very much appreciated.
> I'll look at this ASAP. Just a quick question in order to be certain, did
> you have the opportunity to test all of these changes on real hardware ?
I tested these on real 8xx HW but I used an older 2.4 linux as we haven't
moved forward on 2.4 for quite some time.
The affected files were almost identical though. Would be great if
Scott could give them a spin on 8xx with current 2.4.
Jocke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4
2011-01-11 8:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-11 20:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-01-11 20:27 ` Joakim Tjernlund
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Willy Tarreau @ 2011-01-11 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:12:44AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote on 2011/01/11 07:09:26:
> >
> > Hi Joakim,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> > > bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> > > error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> > > tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the
> > > the store bit when faulting into DTLB error.
> > > A few more bugs very found during development.
> > >
> > > I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
> > > but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
> >
> > Thank you very much for taking care of this, that's very much appreciated.
> > I'll look at this ASAP. Just a quick question in order to be certain, did
> > you have the opportunity to test all of these changes on real hardware ?
>
> I tested these on real 8xx HW but I used an older 2.4 linux as we haven't
> moved forward on 2.4 for quite some time.
> The affected files were almost identical though.
OK thank you for this precision. If you remember what version it was, we can
also diff it against mainline and see if we spot any relevant changes that
we need to take care of.
> Would be great if Scott could give them a spin on 8xx with current 2.4.
Indeed, that would be great. My goal really is that 2.4 users can upgrade
without wondering about any risk of regression. I appreciate a lot your
fixes, they mean some people might see that some issues have suddenly
disappeared. But it's important to stay on the non-reg side as much as
possible.
Thanks,
Willy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4
2011-01-11 20:08 ` Willy Tarreau
@ 2011-01-11 20:27 ` Joakim Tjernlund
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-11 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote on 2011/01/11 21:08:53:
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:12:44AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote on 2011/01/11 07:09:26:
> > >
> > > Hi Joakim,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> > > > bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> > > > error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> > > > tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the
> > > > the store bit when faulting into DTLB error.
> > > > A few more bugs very found during development.
> > > >
> > > > I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
> > > > but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for taking care of this, that's very much appreciated.
> > > I'll look at this ASAP. Just a quick question in order to be certain, did
> > > you have the opportunity to test all of these changes on real hardware ?
> >
> > I tested these on real 8xx HW but I used an older 2.4 linux as we haven't
> > moved forward on 2.4 for quite some time.
> > The affected files were almost identical though.
>
> OK thank you for this precision. If you remember what version it was, we can
> also diff it against mainline and see if we spot any relevant changes that
> we need to take care of.
2.4.21-rc6 is the base version. The we have added bits and pieces.
>
> > Would be great if Scott could give them a spin on 8xx with current 2.4.
>
> Indeed, that would be great. My goal really is that 2.4 users can upgrade
> without wondering about any risk of regression. I appreciate a lot your
> fixes, they mean some people might see that some issues have suddenly
> disappeared. But it's important to stay on the non-reg side as much as
> possible.
Should be faster too :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <OFEC114402.5A694921-ONC1257815.002CC8F2-C1257815.002D1C7D@LocalDomain>]
* Re: [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4
[not found] ` <OFEC114402.5A694921-ONC1257815.002CC8F2-C1257815.002D1C7D@LocalDomain>
@ 2011-01-11 10:56 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-13 20:44 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-11 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Willy Tarreau
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 2011/01/11 09:12:44:
>
> Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote on 2011/01/11 07:09:26:
> >
> > Hi Joakim,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> > > bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> > > error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> > > tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the
> > > the store bit when faulting into DTLB error.
> > > A few more bugs very found during development.
> > >
> > > I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
> > > but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
> >
> > Thank you very much for taking care of this, that's very much appreciated.
> > I'll look at this ASAP. Just a quick question in order to be certain, did
> > you have the opportunity to test all of these changes on real hardware ?
> I tested these on real 8xx HW but I used an older 2.4 linux as we haven't
> moved forward on 2.4 for quite some time.
> The affected files were almost identical though. Would be great if
> Scott could give them a spin on 8xx with current 2.4.
BTW, it occurred to me that the following 8xx quirk is best
done in 8xx code:
>From c1985a3b8b16d96ddce5ef90d5a15e70fb8a2aec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:24:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] 8xx: Move invalidation of non present TLBs
8xx does not invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, move the workaround
in mm/fault.c here to keep 8xx quirks localized.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 ++++++++++--
arch/ppc/mm/fault.c | 7 -------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 75acaa0..24b206c 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -221,7 +221,11 @@ DataAccess:
mr r5,r20
mfspr r4,DAR
stw r4,_DAR(r21)
- li r20,0x00f0
+ /* invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, 8xx MMU don't do this */
+ andis. r20,r5,0x4000
+ beq+ 1f
+ tlbie r4
+1: li r20,0x00f0
mtspr DAR,r20 /* Tag DAR */
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
li r20,MSR_KERNEL
@@ -238,7 +242,11 @@ InstructionAccess:
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
mr r4,r22
mr r5,r23
- li r20,MSR_KERNEL
+ /* invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, 8xx MMU don't do this */
+ andis. r20,r5,0x4000
+ beq+ 1f
+ tlbie r4
+1: li r20,MSR_KERNEL
rlwimi r20,r23,0,16,16 /* copy EE bit from saved MSR */
FINISH_EXCEPTION(do_page_fault)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
index 874005a..8819fb1 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
@@ -116,13 +116,6 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
else
is_write = error_code & 0x02000000;
#endif /* CONFIG_4xx || CONFIG_BOOKE */
-#if defined(CONFIG_8xx)
- /* 8xx does no invalidate TLBs that are ~PRESENT,
- * do it here.
- */
- if (error_code & 0x40000000)
- _tlbie(address);
-#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_XMON) || defined(CONFIG_KGDB)
if (debugger_fault_handler && regs->trap == 0x300) {
debugger_fault_handler(regs);
--
1.7.3.4
Scott, what do you think of this? Is it safe to call tlbie in this context?
Jocke
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4
2011-01-11 10:56 ` Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2011-01-13 20:44 ` Scott Wood
2011-01-13 21:31 ` Joakim Tjernlund
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-01-13 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Willy Tarreau
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:56:32 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se> wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 2011/01/11 09:12:44:
> >
> > Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote on 2011/01/11 07:09:26:
> > >
> > > Hi Joakim,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> > > > bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> > > > error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> > > > tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the
> > > > the store bit when faulting into DTLB error.
> > > > A few more bugs very found during development.
> > > >
> > > > I know 2.4 is in strict maintenance mode and 8xx is obsolete
> > > > but as it is still in use I wanted 8xx to age with grace.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for taking care of this, that's very much appreciated.
> > > I'll look at this ASAP. Just a quick question in order to be certain, did
> > > you have the opportunity to test all of these changes on real hardware ?
>
> > I tested these on real 8xx HW but I used an older 2.4 linux as we haven't
> > moved forward on 2.4 for quite some time.
> > The affected files were almost identical though. Would be great if
> > Scott could give them a spin on 8xx with current 2.4.
Is ep88xc (the board I have easily available to test) supported in
mainline 2.4? I don't see a platform file, defconfig, or bootwrapper
code that obviously covers it.
Is there anyone out there actually using 8xx on top-of-tree mainline
2.4 who can test it?
> BTW, it occurred to me that the following 8xx quirk is best
> done in 8xx code:
>
> From c1985a3b8b16d96ddce5ef90d5a15e70fb8a2aec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:24:22 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] 8xx: Move invalidation of non present TLBs
>
> 8xx does not invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, move the workaround
> in mm/fault.c here to keep 8xx quirks localized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> ---
> arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 ++++++++++--
> arch/ppc/mm/fault.c | 7 -------
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> index 75acaa0..24b206c 100644
> --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> @@ -221,7 +221,11 @@ DataAccess:
> mr r5,r20
> mfspr r4,DAR
> stw r4,_DAR(r21)
> - li r20,0x00f0
> + /* invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, 8xx MMU don't do this */
> + andis. r20,r5,0x4000
> + beq+ 1f
> + tlbie r4
> +1: li r20,0x00f
> mtspr DAR,r20 /* Tag DAR */
> addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> li r20,MSR_KERNEL
> @@ -238,7 +242,11 @@ InstructionAccess:
> addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> mr r4,r22
> mr r5,r23
> - li r20,MSR_KERNEL
> + /* invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, 8xx MMU don't do this */
> + andis. r20,r5,0x4000
> + beq+ 1f
> + tlbie r4
> +1: li r20,MSR_KERNEL
> rlwimi r20,r23,0,16,16 /* copy EE bit from saved MSR */
> FINISH_EXCEPTION(do_page_fault)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
> index 874005a..8819fb1 100644
> --- a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -116,13 +116,6 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> else
> is_write = error_code & 0x02000000;
> #endif /* CONFIG_4xx || CONFIG_BOOKE */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_8xx)
> - /* 8xx does no invalidate TLBs that are ~PRESENT,
> - * do it here.
> - */
> - if (error_code & 0x40000000)
> - _tlbie(address);
> -#endif
> #if defined(CONFIG_XMON) || defined(CONFIG_KGDB)
> if (debugger_fault_handler && regs->trap == 0x300) {
> debugger_fault_handler(regs);
> --
> 1.7.3.4
>
> Scott, what do you think of this? Is it safe to call tlbie in this context?
I'd guess so (I assume the concern is MMU translation being off?), but I
don't have any particular knowledge about this. I'd be checking the
same manual that you have. :-)
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 00/13] powerpc: Backport 8xx TLB to 2.4
2011-01-13 20:44 ` Scott Wood
@ 2011-01-13 21:31 ` Joakim Tjernlund
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2011-01-13 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Wood; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Willy Tarreau
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote on 2011/01/13 21:44:00:
> > BTW, it occurred to me that the following 8xx quirk is best
> > done in 8xx code:
> >
> > From c1985a3b8b16d96ddce5ef90d5a15e70fb8a2aec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:24:22 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] 8xx: Move invalidation of non present TLBs
> >
> > 8xx does not invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, move the workaround
> > in mm/fault.c here to keep 8xx quirks localized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> > ---
> > arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 12 ++++++++++--
> > arch/ppc/mm/fault.c | 7 -------
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> > index 75acaa0..24b206c 100644
> > --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> > +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> > @@ -221,7 +221,11 @@ DataAccess:
> > mr r5,r20
> > mfspr r4,DAR
> > stw r4,_DAR(r21)
> > - li r20,0x00f0
> > + /* invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, 8xx MMU don't do this */
> > + andis. r20,r5,0x4000
> > + beq+ 1f
> > + tlbie r4
> > +1: li r20,0x00f
> > mtspr DAR,r20 /* Tag DAR */
> > addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> > li r20,MSR_KERNEL
> > @@ -238,7 +242,11 @@ InstructionAccess:
> > addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> > mr r4,r22
> > mr r5,r23
> > - li r20,MSR_KERNEL
> > + /* invalidate ~PRESENT TLBs, 8xx MMU don't do this */
> > + andis. r20,r5,0x4000
> > + beq+ 1f
> > + tlbie r4
> > +1: li r20,MSR_KERNEL
> > rlwimi r20,r23,0,16,16 /* copy EE bit from saved MSR */
> > FINISH_EXCEPTION(do_page_fault)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
> > index 874005a..8819fb1 100644
> > --- a/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
> > +++ b/arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
> > @@ -116,13 +116,6 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> > else
> > is_write = error_code & 0x02000000;
> > #endif /* CONFIG_4xx || CONFIG_BOOKE */
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_8xx)
> > - /* 8xx does no invalidate TLBs that are ~PRESENT,
> > - * do it here.
> > - */
> > - if (error_code & 0x40000000)
> > - _tlbie(address);
> > -#endif
> > #if defined(CONFIG_XMON) || defined(CONFIG_KGDB)
> > if (debugger_fault_handler && regs->trap == 0x300) {
> > debugger_fault_handler(regs);
> > --
> > 1.7.3.4
> >
> > Scott, what do you think of this? Is it safe to call tlbie in this context?
>
> I'd guess so (I assume the concern is MMU translation being off?), but I
> don't have any particular knowledge about this. I'd be checking the
> same manual that you have. :-)
I noticed 2.6 uses tlbie in CPU15 errata workaround so it is fine
and it is better to invalidate as soon as possible to free up a TLB slot.
Runs on my old 2.4 too.
Jocke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread