From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use asm goto for put_user() with GCC 4.9
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:29:15 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201103132915.529337-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
Andreas reported that commit ee0a49a6870e ("powerpc/uaccess: Switch
__put_user_size_allowed() to __put_user_asm_goto()") broke
CLONE_CHILD_SETTID.
Further inspection showed that the put_user() in schedule_tail() was
missing entirely, the store not emitted by the compiler.
<.schedule_tail>:
mflr r0
std r0,16(r1)
stdu r1,-112(r1)
bl <.finish_task_switch>
ld r9,2496(r3)
cmpdi cr7,r9,0
bne cr7,<.schedule_tail+0x60>
ld r3,392(r13)
ld r9,1392(r3)
cmpdi cr7,r9,0
beq cr7,<.schedule_tail+0x3c>
li r4,0
li r5,0
bl <.__task_pid_nr_ns>
nop
bl <.calculate_sigpending>
nop
addi r1,r1,112
ld r0,16(r1)
mtlr r0
blr
nop
nop
nop
bl <.__balance_callback>
b <.schedule_tail+0x1c>
Notice there are no stores other than to the stack. There should be a
stw in there for the store to current->set_child_tid.
This is only seen with GCC 4.9 era compilers (tested with 4.9.3 and
4.9.4), and only when CONFIG_PPC_KUAP is disabled.
When CONFIG_PPC_KUAP=y, the memory clobber that's part of the isync()
and mtspr() inlined via allow_user_access() seems to be enough to
avoid the bug.
For now though let's just not use asm goto with GCC 4.9, to avoid this
bug and any other issues we haven't noticed yet. Possibly in future we
can find a smaller workaround.
This is basically a revert of commit ee0a49a6870e ("powerpc/uaccess:
Switch __put_user_size_allowed() to __put_user_asm_goto()") and commit
7fdf966bed15 ("powerpc/uaccess: Remove __put_user_asm() and
__put_user_asm2()"), but only for GCC 4.9.
With this applied the code generation looks more like it will work:
<.schedule_tail>:
mflr r0
std r31,-8(r1)
std r0,16(r1)
stdu r1,-144(r1)
std r3,112(r1)
bl <._mcount>
nop
ld r3,112(r1)
bl <.finish_task_switch>
ld r9,2624(r3)
cmpdi cr7,r9,0
bne cr7,<.schedule_tail+0xa0>
ld r3,2408(r13)
ld r31,1856(r3)
cmpdi cr7,r31,0
beq cr7,<.schedule_tail+0x80>
li r4,0
li r5,0
bl <.__task_pid_nr_ns>
nop
li r9,-1
clrldi r9,r9,12
cmpld cr7,r31,r9
bgt cr7,<.schedule_tail+0x80>
lis r9,16
rldicr r9,r9,32,31
subf r9,r31,r9
cmpldi cr7,r9,3
ble cr7,<.schedule_tail+0x80>
li r9,0
stw r3,0(r31) <-- stw
nop
bl <.calculate_sigpending>
nop
addi r1,r1,144
ld r0,16(r1)
ld r31,-8(r1)
mtlr r0
blr
nop
bl <.__balance_callback>
b <.schedule_tail+0x30>
Fixes: ee0a49a6870e ("powerpc/uaccess: Switch __put_user_size_allowed() to __put_user_asm_goto()")
Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bbb705c08..526a6658946b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -110,6 +110,52 @@ static inline bool __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
extern long __put_user_bad(void);
+#if defined(GCC_VERSION) && GCC_VERSION < 50000
+#define __put_user_asm(x, addr, err, op) \
+ __asm__ __volatile__( \
+ "1: " op "%U2%X2 %1,%2 # put_user\n" \
+ "2:\n" \
+ ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
+ "3: li %0,%3\n" \
+ " b 2b\n" \
+ ".previous\n" \
+ EX_TABLE(1b, 3b) \
+ : "=r" (err) \
+ : "r" (x), "m<>" (*addr), "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
+
+#ifdef __powerpc64__
+#define __put_user_asm2(x, ptr, retval) \
+ __put_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "std")
+#else /* __powerpc64__ */
+#define __put_user_asm2(x, addr, err) \
+ __asm__ __volatile__( \
+ "1: stw%X2 %1,%2\n" \
+ "2: stw%X2 %L1,%L2\n" \
+ "3:\n" \
+ ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
+ "4: li %0,%3\n" \
+ " b 3b\n" \
+ ".previous\n" \
+ EX_TABLE(1b, 4b) \
+ EX_TABLE(2b, 4b) \
+ : "=r" (err) \
+ : "r" (x), "m" (*addr), "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
+#endif /* __powerpc64__ */
+
+#define __put_user_size_allowed(x, ptr, size, retval) \
+do { \
+ retval = 0; \
+ switch (size) { \
+ case 1: __put_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "stb"); break; \
+ case 2: __put_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "sth"); break; \
+ case 4: __put_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "stw"); break; \
+ case 8: __put_user_asm2(x, ptr, retval); break; \
+ default: __put_user_bad(); \
+ } \
+} while (0)
+
+#else
+
#define __put_user_size_allowed(x, ptr, size, retval) \
do { \
__label__ __pu_failed; \
@@ -122,6 +168,8 @@ __pu_failed: \
retval = -EFAULT; \
} while (0)
+#endif /* GCC_VERSION */
+
#define __put_user_size(x, ptr, size, retval) \
do { \
allow_write_to_user(ptr, size); \
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 13:29 Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-11-03 14:43 ` [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use asm goto for put_user() with GCC 4.9 Christophe Leroy
2020-11-03 17:04 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-03 18:58 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-03 19:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-04 11:04 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201103132915.529337-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox