LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings
@ 2022-02-08  6:46 Damien Le Moal
  2022-02-08  6:50 ` Damien Le Moal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-02-08  6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev, Michael Ellerman, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Paul Mackerras, linux-ide

Use the %u format for unsigned int parameters handling with sscanf() and
sysfs_emit() to avoid compilation warnings. In
fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(), the call to sscanf() to parse a single
argument is replaced with a call to kstrtouint().

While at it, also replace the printk(KERN_ERR) calls with dev_err()
calls and fix blank lines in fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store().

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
---
 drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index da0152116d9f..556034a15430 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static void fsl_sata_set_irq_coalescing(struct ata_host *host,
 static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_show(struct device *dev,
 		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
-	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d	%d\n",
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u	%u\n",
 			intr_coalescing_count, intr_coalescing_ticks);
 }
 
@@ -332,10 +332,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_store(struct device *dev,
 {
 	unsigned int coalescing_count,	coalescing_ticks;
 
-	if (sscanf(buf, "%d%d",
-				&coalescing_count,
-				&coalescing_ticks) != 2) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
+	if (sscanf(buf, "%u%u", &coalescing_count, &coalescing_ticks) != 2) {
+		dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_show(struct device *dev,
 	rx_watermark &= 0x1f;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
 
-	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", rx_watermark);
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", rx_watermark);
 }
 
 static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
@@ -373,8 +371,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
 	void __iomem *csr_base = host_priv->csr_base;
 	u32 temp;
 
-	if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &rx_watermark) != 1) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
+	if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &rx_watermark) < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -382,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
 	temp = ioread32(csr_base + TRANSCFG);
 	temp &= 0xffffffe0;
 	iowrite32(temp | rx_watermark, csr_base + TRANSCFG);
-
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+
 	return strlen(buf);
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings
  2022-02-08  6:46 [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings Damien Le Moal
@ 2022-02-08  6:50 ` Damien Le Moal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-02-08  6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev, Michael Ellerman, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Paul Mackerras, linux-ide

On 2/8/22 15:46, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Use the %u format for unsigned int parameters handling with sscanf() and
> sysfs_emit() to avoid compilation warnings. In
> fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(), the call to sscanf() to parse a single
> argument is replaced with a call to kstrtouint().
> 
> While at it, also replace the printk(KERN_ERR) calls with dev_err()
> calls and fix blank lines in fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store().
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
> index da0152116d9f..556034a15430 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static void fsl_sata_set_irq_coalescing(struct ata_host *host,
>  static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_show(struct device *dev,
>  		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
> -	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d	%d\n",
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u	%u\n",
>  			intr_coalescing_count, intr_coalescing_ticks);
>  }
>  
> @@ -332,10 +332,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_store(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	unsigned int coalescing_count,	coalescing_ticks;
>  
> -	if (sscanf(buf, "%d%d",
> -				&coalescing_count,
> -				&coalescing_ticks) != 2) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
> +	if (sscanf(buf, "%u%u", &coalescing_count, &coalescing_ticks) != 2) {

PPC folks,

The "%u%u" sscanf() format above seems totally bogus to me. How could 2
unsigned int without a separating characters be parsed as such ? Surely,
a separation character is needed, no ?

I cannot find any documentation on what the intr_coalescing sysfs
attribute format should be... Please have a look.


> +		dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_show(struct device *dev,
>  	rx_watermark &= 0x1f;
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>  
> -	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", rx_watermark);
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", rx_watermark);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
> @@ -373,8 +371,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
>  	void __iomem *csr_base = host_priv->csr_base;
>  	u32 temp;
>  
> -	if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &rx_watermark) != 1) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
> +	if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &rx_watermark) < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -382,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
>  	temp = ioread32(csr_base + TRANSCFG);
>  	temp &= 0xffffffe0;
>  	iowrite32(temp | rx_watermark, csr_base + TRANSCFG);
> -
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
>  	return strlen(buf);
>  }
>  


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-08  6:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-08  6:46 [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings Damien Le Moal
2022-02-08  6:50 ` Damien Le Moal

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox