* [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings
@ 2022-02-08 6:46 Damien Le Moal
2022-02-08 6:50 ` Damien Le Moal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-02-08 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Michael Ellerman, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Paul Mackerras, linux-ide
Use the %u format for unsigned int parameters handling with sscanf() and
sysfs_emit() to avoid compilation warnings. In
fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(), the call to sscanf() to parse a single
argument is replaced with a call to kstrtouint().
While at it, also replace the printk(KERN_ERR) calls with dev_err()
calls and fix blank lines in fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store().
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
---
drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index da0152116d9f..556034a15430 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static void fsl_sata_set_irq_coalescing(struct ata_host *host,
static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d %d\n",
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u %u\n",
intr_coalescing_count, intr_coalescing_ticks);
}
@@ -332,10 +332,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_store(struct device *dev,
{
unsigned int coalescing_count, coalescing_ticks;
- if (sscanf(buf, "%d%d",
- &coalescing_count,
- &coalescing_ticks) != 2) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
+ if (sscanf(buf, "%u%u", &coalescing_count, &coalescing_ticks) != 2) {
+ dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_show(struct device *dev,
rx_watermark &= 0x1f;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", rx_watermark);
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", rx_watermark);
}
static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
@@ -373,8 +371,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
void __iomem *csr_base = host_priv->csr_base;
u32 temp;
- if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &rx_watermark) != 1) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
+ if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &rx_watermark) < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -382,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
temp = ioread32(csr_base + TRANSCFG);
temp &= 0xffffffe0;
iowrite32(temp | rx_watermark, csr_base + TRANSCFG);
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+
return strlen(buf);
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings
2022-02-08 6:46 [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings Damien Le Moal
@ 2022-02-08 6:50 ` Damien Le Moal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-02-08 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Michael Ellerman, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Paul Mackerras, linux-ide
On 2/8/22 15:46, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Use the %u format for unsigned int parameters handling with sscanf() and
> sysfs_emit() to avoid compilation warnings. In
> fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(), the call to sscanf() to parse a single
> argument is replaced with a call to kstrtouint().
>
> While at it, also replace the printk(KERN_ERR) calls with dev_err()
> calls and fix blank lines in fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store().
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 16 +++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
> index da0152116d9f..556034a15430 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static void fsl_sata_set_irq_coalescing(struct ata_host *host,
> static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d %d\n",
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u %u\n",
> intr_coalescing_count, intr_coalescing_ticks);
> }
>
> @@ -332,10 +332,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_intr_coalescing_store(struct device *dev,
> {
> unsigned int coalescing_count, coalescing_ticks;
>
> - if (sscanf(buf, "%d%d",
> - &coalescing_count,
> - &coalescing_ticks) != 2) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
> + if (sscanf(buf, "%u%u", &coalescing_count, &coalescing_ticks) != 2) {
PPC folks,
The "%u%u" sscanf() format above seems totally bogus to me. How could 2
unsigned int without a separating characters be parsed as such ? Surely,
a separation character is needed, no ?
I cannot find any documentation on what the intr_coalescing sysfs
attribute format should be... Please have a look.
> + dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_show(struct device *dev,
> rx_watermark &= 0x1f;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>
> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", rx_watermark);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", rx_watermark);
> }
>
> static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
> @@ -373,8 +371,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
> void __iomem *csr_base = host_priv->csr_base;
> u32 temp;
>
> - if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &rx_watermark) != 1) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
> + if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &rx_watermark) < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "fsl-sata: wrong parameter format.\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -382,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t fsl_sata_rx_watermark_store(struct device *dev,
> temp = ioread32(csr_base + TRANSCFG);
> temp &= 0xffffffe0;
> iowrite32(temp | rx_watermark, csr_base + TRANSCFG);
> -
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> return strlen(buf);
> }
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-08 6:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-08 6:46 [PATCH] ata: sata_fsl: fix sscanf() and sysfs_emit() format strings Damien Le Moal
2022-02-08 6:50 ` Damien Le Moal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox