From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Cc: rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:43:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220408014301.GW4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAABZP2yDe3dU0DtigvAE4CQLAipvT81Bw4LrF5WjLSiP5nq1UA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 07:14:20AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Dear Paul and Miguel
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 1:55 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 07:05:58PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:15 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ah. So you would instead look for boot to have completed within 10
> > > > seconds? Either way, reliable automation might well more important than
> > > > reduction in time.
> > >
> > > No (although I guess that could be an option), I was only pointing out
> > > that when no stall is produced, the run should be much quicker than 30
> > > seconds (at least it was in my setup), which would be the majority of the runs.
> >
> > Ah, thank you for the clarification!
> Thank both of you for the information. In my setup (PPC cloud VM), the
> majority of the runs complete at least for 50 seconds. From last
> evening to this morning (Beijing Time), following experiments have
> been done:
> 1) torture mainline: the test quickly finished by hitting "rcu_sched
> self-detected stall" after 12 runs
> 2) torture v5.17: the test last 10 hours plus 14 minutes, 702 runs
> have been done without trigger the bug
>
> Conclusion:
> There must be a commit that causes the bug as Paul has pointed out.
> I am going to do the bisect, and estimate to locate the bug within a
> week (at most).
> This is a good learning experience, thanks for the guidance ;-)
Very good, and looking forward to seeing what you find.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 21:41 rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-06 9:31 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-06 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-06 18:25 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-06 19:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-07 2:26 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-07 10:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-07 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-07 17:05 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-07 17:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-07 23:14 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-08 1:43 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-04-08 7:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-08 10:02 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-08 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 14:25 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-10 11:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-11 3:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-12 6:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-12 13:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 13:52 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-08 14:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 14:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-08 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 17:02 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-13 5:11 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-13 6:10 ` Low-res tick handler device not going to ONESHOT_STOPPED when tick is stopped (was: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU) Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-14 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-22 15:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-23 2:29 ` Re: Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220408014301.GW4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhouzhouyi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox