From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] mm/sparse-vmemmap: Fix DAX vmemmap accounting with optimization
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 11:05:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6CE53F-918C-4D03-9DBD-1745E28A2D9E@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0fe62163-cdfd-47e4-bc88-df7a69dc5a6d@kernel.org>
> On Apr 24, 2026, at 15:33, David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/24/26 04:55, Muchun Song wrote:
>> When vmemmap optimization is enabled for DAX, the nr_memmap_pages
>> counter in /proc/vmstat is incorrect. The current code always accounts
>> for the full, non-optimized vmemmap size, but vmemmap optimization
>> reduces the actual number of vmemmap pages by reusing tail pages. This
>> causes the system to overcount vmemmap usage, leading to inaccurate
>> page statistics in /proc/vmstat.
>>
>> Fix this by introducing section_vmemmap_pages(), which returns the exact
>> vmemmap page count for a given pfn range based on whether optimization
>> is in effect.
>>
>> Fixes: 15995a352474 ("mm: report per-page metadata information")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>> ---
>> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>> index 3340f6d30b01..2e642c5ff3f2 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>> @@ -652,6 +652,28 @@ void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static int __meminit section_nr_vmemmap_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> + struct vmem_altmap *altmap, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
>> +{
>> + const unsigned int order = pgmap ? pgmap->vmemmap_shift : 0;
>> + const unsigned long pages_per_compound = 1UL << order;
>> +
>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages,
>> + min(pages_per_compound, PAGES_PER_SECTION)));
>
> FWIW, I though the right thing to do here would be:
>
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, pages_per_compound);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION);
>
> I don't really see how PAGES_PER_SECTION make sense given that
> PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION are the smallest granularity we allow adding/removing.
>
> Also, the "min()" implies that there is a connection between both properties,
> but there isn't to that degree.
>
> If order == 0, then you'd only ever check alignment for ... 1, not
> PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION, which already looks weird.
>
> So you really want to check "max(pages_per_compound, PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION)", but
> just having two statements is clearer.
>
> Or am I getting something very wrong here? :)
Hi David,
Sorry, I missed the 1GB hugepage scenario earlier. Given that sparse_add_section()
operates on a scale between PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION and PAGES_PER_SECTION, the pfn and
nr_pages parameters wouldn't be aligned with the hugepage size (pages_per_compound),
but rather with the PAGES_PER_SECTION boundary. Do you think this explanation makes
it clearer? In the interest of code clarity, do you think the modification below
makes it easier to follow?
diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
index 2e642c5ff3f2..ce675c5fb94d 100644
--- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
@@ -658,15 +658,18 @@ static int __meminit section_nr_vmemmap_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long n
const unsigned int order = pgmap ? pgmap->vmemmap_shift : 0;
const unsigned long pages_per_compound = 1UL << order;
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages,
- min(pages_per_compound, PAGES_PER_SECTION)));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION));
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) != pfn_to_section_nr(pfn + nr_pages - 1));
if (!vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap))
return DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages * sizeof(struct page), PAGE_SIZE);
- if (order < PFN_SECTION_SHIFT)
+ if (order < PFN_SECTION_SHIFT) {
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, pages_per_compound));
return VMEMMAP_RESERVE_NR * nr_pages / pages_per_compound;
+ }
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SECTION));
if (IS_ALIGNED(pfn, pages_per_compound))
return VMEMMAP_RESERVE_NR;
Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-25 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 2:55 [PATCH v6 0/7] mm: fix vmemmap optimization accounting and initialization Muchun Song
2026-04-24 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] mm/sparse-vmemmap: Fix vmemmap accounting underflow Muchun Song
2026-04-24 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Fix incorrect altmap passing in error path Muchun Song
2026-04-24 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] mm/sparse-vmemmap: Pass @pgmap argument to memory deactivation paths Muchun Song
2026-04-24 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] mm/sparse-vmemmap: Fix DAX vmemmap accounting with optimization Muchun Song
2026-04-24 7:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 7:48 ` Muchun Song
2026-04-25 3:05 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-04-25 5:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-25 6:20 ` Muchun Song
2026-04-25 6:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-25 6:56 ` Muchun Song
2026-04-24 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] mm/mm_init: Fix pageblock migratetype for ZONE_DEVICE compound pages Muchun Song
2026-04-24 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] mm/mm_init: Fix uninitialized struct pages for ZONE_DEVICE Muchun Song
2026-04-24 8:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-24 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Factor out altmap freeing checks Muchun Song
2026-04-24 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 10:20 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 11:58 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C6CE53F-918C-4D03-9DBD-1745E28A2D9E@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox