From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/prom: Remove redundant early_init_dt_scan_root() call
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 09:25:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f616ef5-3e90-4ddb-874b-64ba98267192@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ah2KsuPcOu8tVOXo@shivang.upadyay>
On 01/06/26 19:10, Shivang Upadhyay wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 02:42:50PM +0530, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> Commit 554b66233623 ("of/fdt: Scan the root node properties earlier")
>> moved the invocation of early_init_dt_scan_root() into
>> early_init_dt_verify().
>>
>> early_init_devtree() already calls early_init_dt_verify(), so the root
>> node properties are parsed before reaching the explicit call in this
>> function.
>>
>> Keeping the call here results in scanning the root node twice. Remove
>> the redundant call and rely on the invocation from
>> early_init_dt_verify().
>>
>> This change keeps the behavior the same and removes an unnecessary
>> duplicate call.
>>
>> Cc: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> index 9ed9dde7d231..d218c8cc1f73 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> @@ -824,7 +824,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
>> fadump_append_bootargs();
>>
>> /* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
>> - early_init_dt_scan_root();
>> early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc();
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>>
> Hi Sourabh,
>
> Patch Looks good to me. Ran a quick boot test also.
> Feel free to add.
>
> Tested-by: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks for the testing and review, Shivang.
- Sourabh Jain
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 9:12 [PATCH] powerpc/prom: Remove redundant early_init_dt_scan_root() call Sourabh Jain
2026-06-01 13:40 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-06-03 3:55 ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f616ef5-3e90-4ddb-874b-64ba98267192@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=shivangu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox