LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/prom: Remove redundant early_init_dt_scan_root() call
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 19:10:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah2KsuPcOu8tVOXo@shivang.upadyay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418091250.134111-1-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>

On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 02:42:50PM +0530, Sourabh Jain wrote:
> Commit 554b66233623 ("of/fdt: Scan the root node properties earlier")
> moved the invocation of early_init_dt_scan_root() into
> early_init_dt_verify().
> 
> early_init_devtree() already calls early_init_dt_verify(), so the root
> node properties are parsed before reaching the explicit call in this
> function.
> 
> Keeping the call here results in scanning the root node twice. Remove
> the redundant call and rely on the invocation from
> early_init_dt_verify().
> 
> This change keeps the behavior the same and removes an unnecessary
> duplicate call.
> 
> Cc: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Cc: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index 9ed9dde7d231..d218c8cc1f73 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
>  	fadump_append_bootargs();
>  
>  	/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
> -	early_init_dt_scan_root();
>  	early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc();
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 

Hi Sourabh,

Patch Looks good to me. Ran a quick boot test also.
Feel free to add.

Tested-by: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>

~Shivang.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-18  9:12 [PATCH] powerpc/prom: Remove redundant early_init_dt_scan_root() call Sourabh Jain
2026-06-01 13:40 ` Shivang Upadhyay [this message]
2026-06-03  3:55   ` Sourabh Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ah2KsuPcOu8tVOXo@shivang.upadyay \
    --to=shivangu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox