Re: [PATCH] cxl/ocxl: Possible repeated word

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

zhumao001@208suo.com writes:
> Delete repeated word in comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> index 50b0c44bb8d7..6957946a6463 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ int cxl_attach_dedicated_process_psl9(struct 
> cxl_context *ctx, u64 wed, u64 amr)
>        * Ideally we should do a wmb() here to make sure the changes to 
> the
>        * PE are visible to the card before we call afu_enable.
>        * On ppc64 though all mmios are preceded by a 'sync' instruction 
> hence
> -     * we dont dont need one here.
> +     * we dont need one here.

I know the rule is to only do one change per patch, but if you're fixing
the wording of a comment you can absolutely fix the spelling at the same
time.

So please send a v2 with "dont" spelt correctly.

cheers