* [PATCH] ppc/fadump: collect dump if the collected size is lesser than reserved @ 2026-07-14 17:30 Shivang Upadhyay 2026-07-19 7:09 ` Sourabh Jain 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Shivang Upadhyay @ 2026-07-14 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Cc: maddy, mpe, npiggin, chleroy, sourabhjain, adri.vero.dev, adityag, anushree.mathur, Shivang Upadhyay When a machine is subjected to CPUs add/remove, using dlpar operations, the number of collected CPU_NOTES can change. As per PAPR, collected dump size should not be more than allocated size. Reflecting the same in source. Signed-off-by: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c index 3bb4ac2ab6cc..19a5adaf326b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c @@ -469,7 +469,8 @@ static int __init rtas_fadump_process(struct fw_dump *fadump_conf) pr_err("Dump taken by platform is not valid (%d)\n", i); rc = -EINVAL; } - if (fdm_active->rgn[i].bytes_dumped != fdm_active->rgn[i].source_len) { + if (be64_to_cpu(fdm_active->rgn[i].bytes_dumped) + > be64_to_cpu(fdm_active->rgn[i].source_len)) { pr_err("Dump taken by platform is incomplete (%d)\n", i); rc = -EINVAL; } -- 2.54.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ppc/fadump: collect dump if the collected size is lesser than reserved 2026-07-14 17:30 [PATCH] ppc/fadump: collect dump if the collected size is lesser than reserved Shivang Upadhyay @ 2026-07-19 7:09 ` Sourabh Jain 2026-07-22 9:11 ` Shivang Upadhyay 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Sourabh Jain @ 2026-07-19 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shivang Upadhyay, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Cc: maddy, mpe, npiggin, chleroy, adri.vero.dev, adityag, anushree.mathur Could you please reword the commit title to make it a bit clearer? On 14/07/26 23:00, Shivang Upadhyay wrote: > When a machine is subjected to CPUs add/remove, using dlpar > operations, the number of collected CPU_NOTES can change. > As per PAPR, collected dump size should not be more than > allocated size. Reflecting the same in source. Can you add more details about the problem you are trying to solve with this patch and how. Adding the error message and scenario would be really helpful in understanding the problem. Can you add Closes tag if it is reported upstream and if possible fixes tag too. > Signed-off-by: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c > index 3bb4ac2ab6cc..19a5adaf326b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c > @@ -469,7 +469,8 @@ static int __init rtas_fadump_process(struct fw_dump *fadump_conf) > pr_err("Dump taken by platform is not valid (%d)\n", i); > rc = -EINVAL; > } > - if (fdm_active->rgn[i].bytes_dumped != fdm_active->rgn[i].source_len) { > + if (be64_to_cpu(fdm_active->rgn[i].bytes_dumped) > + > be64_to_cpu(fdm_active->rgn[i].source_len)) { Can you please share your observations about `bytes_dump` for both QEMU and a real system (LPAR) where the number of online CPUs is not equal to the maximum number of CPUs? I agree that you're making these changes to comply with PAPR, but since this has been working for so long, it would be good to have all the data before making this change. - Sourabh Jain > pr_err("Dump taken by platform is incomplete (%d)\n", i); > rc = -EINVAL; > } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ppc/fadump: collect dump if the collected size is lesser than reserved 2026-07-19 7:09 ` Sourabh Jain @ 2026-07-22 9:11 ` Shivang Upadhyay 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Shivang Upadhyay @ 2026-07-22 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sourabh Jain, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Cc: maddy, mpe, npiggin, chleroy, adri.vero.dev, adityag, anushree.mathur On Sun, 2026-07-19 at 12:39 +0530, Sourabh Jain wrote: > Could you please reword the commit title to make it a bit clearer? > > > On 14/07/26 23:00, Shivang Upadhyay wrote: > > When a machine is subjected to CPUs add/remove, using dlpar > > operations, the number of collected CPU_NOTES can change. > > As per PAPR, collected dump size should not be more than > > allocated size. Reflecting the same in source. > > Can you add more details about the problem you are trying to solve > with this patch and how. > > Adding the error message and scenario would be really helpful in > understanding the problem. > Hi Sourabh, When a qemu ppc machine is booted with fadump=on and `- smp=x,maxcpus=y`, on the panic kernel, /proc/vmcore is not generated because dump_bytes and source_len does'nt match for CPU_STATE_DATA region in fadump, then we just give up on parsing rest of the data. > Can you add Closes tag if it is reported upstream and if possible > fixes > tag too. > > > Signed-off-by: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c > > index 3bb4ac2ab6cc..19a5adaf326b 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtas-fadump.c > > @@ -469,7 +469,8 @@ static int __init rtas_fadump_process(struct > > fw_dump *fadump_conf) > > pr_err("Dump taken by platform is > > not valid (%d)\n", i); > > rc = -EINVAL; > > } > > - if (fdm_active->rgn[i].bytes_dumped != > > fdm_active->rgn[i].source_len) { > > + if (be64_to_cpu(fdm_active- > > >rgn[i].bytes_dumped) > > + > be64_to_cpu(fdm_active- > > >rgn[i].source_len)) { > > Can you please share your observations about `bytes_dump` for both > QEMU > and a > real system (LPAR) where the number of online CPUs is not equal to > the > maximum I have the following observation. I booted LPAR with 8 cpus. After crashing it I saw that fadump CPU_STATE_DATA has notes for total 16 cpus, and only top 8 notes have valid entries. when trying with 16, I see all NOTES have entried filled. I previously proposed this fake entries fix in qemu [1]. But that is not compliant with PAPR, which states that cpu notes should be collected for current_cpus only. As per current states of things, reservation is always done for maxcpus, (LPAR and QEMU both), NOTES collections is done for current cpus on QEMU, and maxcpus on LPARs. My proposal here is that we make the check for bytes_dumped and source_len, less restrictive to let QEMU also generate /proc/vmcore, when current_cpus != maxcpus. Regards ~Shivang. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260520092857.1079193-1-shivangu@linux.ibm.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-22 9:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-07-14 17:30 [PATCH] ppc/fadump: collect dump if the collected size is lesser than reserved Shivang Upadhyay 2026-07-19 7:09 ` Sourabh Jain 2026-07-22 9:11 ` Shivang Upadhyay
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox