Live Patching
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jpoimboe@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, jikos@kernel.org,
	mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
	puranjay@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 51/58] objtool/klp: Add test for instruction operand checksums
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:50:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911185031.1534046-26-song@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911185031.1534046-1-song@kernel.org>

checksum_update_insn() hashes an instruction's bytes and then what any
relocation on it refers to: a string section contributes the string's
contents, anything else the target symbol's name and adjusted addend, with
a reference to a static resolved through its section symbol first.

None of that shows up in the bytes.  A rel32 operand is zero in the object
and supplied by the relocation, so calling a different function, editing a
literal the code passes, or reading a different index of an array all leave
the encoded instruction byte-identical.  A checksum stopping at the bytes
reports the function unchanged and the patch silently does not contain the
fix.

test-checksum-position is the other half: what must *not* change the
checksum when a function merely moves.

Each of the four is verified by sabotaging the line it covers.  The static
case needed a writer the compiler cannot see through -- without one it
proves the array is never written, folds every read to zero, and emits no
relocation at all, so the reference under test does not exist and the
variant passes having compared two identical objects.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4
Based-on-test-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
 .../tests/generic/fixtures/checksum_insn.c    | 78 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../tests/generic/test-checksum-insn.sh       | 49 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/objtool/tests/generic/fixtures/checksum_insn.c
 create mode 100755 tools/objtool/tests/generic/test-checksum-insn.sh

diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/generic/fixtures/checksum_insn.c b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/fixtures/checksum_insn.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..10f70a74a976
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/fixtures/checksum_insn.c
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Instruction operands whose change must move a function's checksum even
+ * though the instruction bytes themselves do not.
+ *
+ * checksum_update_insn() hashes the raw bytes and then, when the instruction
+ * carries a relocation, what that relocation refers to: a string section
+ * contributes the string's contents, anything else the target symbol's name
+ * and the adjusted addend.  A reference to a static arrives as a section
+ * symbol and has to be resolved back to the object first.
+ *
+ * The bytes are identical in every case below -- a rel32 operand is zero in
+ * the object and supplied by the relocation -- so a checksum that stopped at
+ * the bytes would call all of these unchanged.
+ *
+ * Each variant applies to the patched build only:
+ *
+ *   WHICH_CALL    calls a different function
+ *   STR_CONTENT   passes a literal whose text was edited
+ *   WHICH_SLOT    reads a different index of a global array: addend only
+ *   WHICH_PRIV    the same, for a static, reached through its section symbol
+ */
+
+static const char __modinfo[]
+	__attribute__((section(".modinfo"), used, aligned(1))) = "\0name=vmlinux";
+
+int callee_a(int x);
+int callee_b(int x);
+int sink(const char *s);
+
+int slots[4];
+
+/*
+ * A file-local array, plus a writer the compiler cannot see through.  Without
+ * one it can prove the array is never written, folds every read to zero, and
+ * emits no relocation at all -- so the reference this is here to exercise does
+ * not exist.
+ */
+static int priv_slots[4];
+
+void set_priv(int i, int v);
+void set_priv(int i, int v)
+{
+	priv_slots[i] = v;
+}
+
+#if defined(PATCHED) && defined(STR_CONTENT)
+#define MESSAGE "edited"
+#else
+#define MESSAGE "original"
+#endif
+
+int target(int x)
+{
+	int r;
+
+#if defined(PATCHED) && defined(WHICH_CALL)
+	r = callee_b(x);
+#else
+	r = callee_a(x);
+#endif
+
+	r += sink(MESSAGE);
+
+#if defined(PATCHED) && defined(WHICH_SLOT)
+	r += slots[2];
+#else
+	r += slots[1];
+#endif
+
+#if defined(PATCHED) && defined(WHICH_PRIV)
+	r += priv_slots[3];
+#else
+	r += priv_slots[1];
+#endif
+
+	return r;
+}
diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/generic/test-checksum-insn.sh b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/test-checksum-insn.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..e1c04a1f518a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/test-checksum-insn.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# What a function's checksum has to cover beyond its instruction bytes.
+#
+# checksum_update_insn() hashes the raw bytes, and then what any relocation on
+# the instruction refers to: a string section contributes the string's
+# contents, anything else the target symbol's name and the adjusted addend,
+# with a reference to a static resolved back through its section symbol first.
+#
+# None of these show up in the bytes.  A rel32 operand is zero in the object
+# and supplied by the relocation, so every change below leaves the encoded
+# instruction byte-identical.  A checksum stopping at the bytes reports the
+# function unchanged, klp diff omits it, and the patch silently does not
+# contain the fix.
+#
+# test-checksum-position is the other half of this: it covers what must *not*
+# change the checksum when a function merely moves.
+#
+# Covers the same ground as corpus/x86_64/checksum-reloc-sym,
+# checksum-pc-relative-addend, checksum-string-reloc and
+# checksum-sec-sym-resolve in Joe Lawrence's klp-build unit test corpus.
+
+. "$(dirname "$0")/../lib.sh"
+
+setup
+
+# check <flag> <what it changes>
+check()
+{
+	build_pair checksum_insn.c "-D$1"
+	run_checksum
+
+	# The premise for all of them: the operand is a relocation, not bytes.
+	assert_checksum_differs target
+}
+
+check WHICH_CALL    # relocation target name
+check STR_CONTENT   # contents of a string the code passes
+check WHICH_SLOT    # addend, same target symbol
+check WHICH_PRIV    # addend via a static's section symbol
+
+# The converse: rebuilding identical source leaves it alone, so the above is
+# not just "any rebuild moves the checksum".
+build_pair checksum_insn.c
+run_checksum
+assert_checksum_matches target
+
+pass "instruction checksums cover reloc targets, addends and string contents"
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 18:42 [PATCH 00/58] Unit test framework for klp-build toolchain Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 01/58] objtool: Add test harness for the klp subcommands Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 02/58] objtool/klp: Check the klp test environment once, before any test Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 03/58] objtool/klp: Group the klp tests by architecture Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 04/58] objtool/klp: Classify klp test outcomes Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 05/58] objtool/klp: Build klp test fixtures through the harness Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/58] objtool/klp: Grow the klp test harness vocabulary Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 07/58] objtool/klp: Give each run one working directory, one per test inside it Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 08/58] objtool/klp: Run the klp tests under set -u Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 09/58] objtool/klp: Document the klp test harness Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 10/58] objtool: Keep failing test workdirs by default Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 11/58] objtool: Forward toolchain variables to the klp test runner Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 12/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting changed data Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 13/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced data Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 14/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced functions Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 15/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static local correlation Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 16/58] objtool/klp: Add test for cold function halves Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 17/58] objtool/klp: Add test for special section extraction Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 18/58] objtool/klp: Add test for selective " Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 19/58] objtool/klp: Add test for jump table key relocations Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 20/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symids in discarded sections Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 23/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting references to init code/data Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 24/58] objtool/klp: Add test for correlation across ThinLTO name mangling Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 25/58] objtool/klp: Add test for objects without .modinfo Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:49 ` [PATCH 26/58] objtool/klp: Add test for unchecksummed input Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 27/58] objtool/klp: Add klp diff and post-link regression tests Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 28/58] objtool/klp: Add test for klp reloc section naming in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 29/58] objtool/klp: Add test for vmlinux relocs in a patched module Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 30/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Module.symvers path normalization Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 31/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the contents of the klp_funcs list Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 32/58] objtool/klp: Add test for EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES references Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 33/58] objtool/klp: Add test for new references to exported symbols Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 34/58] objtool/klp: Add test for empty x86 alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 35/58] objtool/klp: Add test for recorded checksum values Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 36/58] objtool/klp: Add test for position-independent checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:16     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 37/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:21     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 38/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos resolved against a linked vmlinux Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 39/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static locals which must not be correlated Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 40/58] objtool/klp: Add test for __bug_table, __ex_table and __mcount_loc extraction Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:20     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 41/58] objtool/klp: Add test for kCFI prefix symbols and traps Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:21     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 42/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols whose linkage the patch changes Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 43/58] objtool/klp: Test rejection of a file-local static branch key Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 44/58] objtool/klp: Test a hand-built livepatch module's static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 45/58] objtool/klp: Test text annotations on alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 46/58] objtool/klp: Add test for data object checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 47/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols with no checksum entry of their own Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:23     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 48/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static branch introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 49/58] objtool/klp: Add test for tracepoint and pr_debug static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 50/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static call introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:25     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` Song Liu [this message]
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 52/58] objtool/klp: Add test for alternative replacement code in checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:30     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 53/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the alignment of cloned data sections Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 54/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a patch which strips a data annotation Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:24     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 55/58] objtool/klp: Add test for absolute and __ADDRESSABLE symbols Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 56/58] objtool/klp: Add test for UBSAN metadata in an unchanged function Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 57/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Clang switch jump tables Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:27     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50   ` [PATCH 58/58] objtool/klp: Add test for ThinLTO symbols sharing a demangled name Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:28     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13  1:53 ` [PATCH 00/58] Unit test framework for klp-build toolchain Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260911185031.1534046-26-song@kernel.org \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox