From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jpoimboe@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, jikos@kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
puranjay@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 52/58] objtool/klp: Add test for alternative replacement code in checksums
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:50:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911185031.1534046-27-song@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911185031.1534046-1-song@kernel.org>
checksum_update_insn() walks insn->alts after hashing the instruction
itself: the alternative's type, and where the replacement forms a group,
its feature number and every instruction in it. A patch which edits only
the replacement -- code that runs on some CPUs and not others -- still has
to move the function's checksum.
When it does not, klp diff calls the function unchanged and leaves it out.
The patch ships the old replacement, and the bug is fixed only on machines
whose CPU takes the other arm. Which machines those are depends on the
feature bit, so it presents as a machine-specific bug rather than a missing
patch.
insn->alts is built by objtool's check pass, not by the compiler, so the
pair goes through that first. --mcount is the action used: it is the
cheapest one that does not also need --link.
Two of the three paths are isolated. Skipping the alts walk and dropping
the feature hash both make this fail, and the second of those only exists
inside the alt_group branch, so reaching it proves the grouped path is
taken. The alternative's type is hashed but not varied here -- the fixture
emits one kind of alternative -- so that line is covered without being
isolated, as is the in_alt recursion guard, which wants nested
alternatives.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4
Based-on-test-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
.../objtool/tests/x86/fixtures/checksum_alt.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/objtool/tests/x86/test-checksum-alt.sh | 45 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/objtool/tests/x86/fixtures/checksum_alt.c
create mode 100755 tools/objtool/tests/x86/test-checksum-alt.sh
diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/x86/fixtures/checksum_alt.c b/tools/objtool/tests/x86/fixtures/checksum_alt.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..47ff93bc7755
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/objtool/tests/x86/fixtures/checksum_alt.c
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * An x86 alternative whose replacement code is part of the patched function's
+ * checksum.
+ *
+ * checksum_update_insn() walks insn->alts after hashing the instruction
+ * itself, hashing the alternative's type and, when the replacement forms a
+ * group, its feature number and every instruction in it. So editing only the
+ * replacement -- code the CPU may or may not ever run -- has to move the
+ * function's checksum.
+ *
+ * It is reached through objtool's own alternative handling, so the object has
+ * to go through the check pass first: insn->alts is built there, not by the
+ * compiler.
+ *
+ * struct alt_instr is written out by hand as in empty_alternative.c: s32
+ * instr_offset, s32 repl_offset, u32 ft_flags, u8 instrlen, u8 replacementlen.
+ *
+ * Variants, applied to the patched build only:
+ *
+ * ALT_REPL the replacement instruction changes; the original does not
+ * ALT_FEATURE the feature number changes; no code changes at all
+ */
+
+static const char __modinfo[]
+ __attribute__((section(".modinfo"), used, aligned(1))) = "\0name=vmlinux";
+
+#if defined(PATCHED) && defined(ALT_REPL)
+#define REPL_INSN " xchg %ax, %ax\n\t"
+#else
+#define REPL_INSN " nop\n\t"
+#endif
+
+#if defined(PATCHED) && defined(ALT_FEATURE)
+#define FEATURE "7"
+#else
+#define FEATURE "3"
+#endif
+
+int target(int x)
+{
+ asm volatile(
+ "661: nop\n\t"
+ "662:\n\t"
+ ".pushsection .altinstr_replacement, \"ax\"\n\t"
+ ".globl target_repl\n\t"
+ "target_repl:\n\t"
+ REPL_INSN
+ "target_repl_end:\n\t"
+ ".popsection\n\t"
+ ".pushsection .altinstructions, \"aM\", @progbits, 14\n\t"
+ ".long 661b - .\n\t"
+ ".long target_repl - .\n\t"
+ ".long " FEATURE "\n\t"
+ ".byte 662b - 661b\n\t"
+ ".byte target_repl_end - target_repl\n\t"
+ ".popsection\n\t");
+
+ return x + 1;
+}
diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/x86/test-checksum-alt.sh b/tools/objtool/tests/x86/test-checksum-alt.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..74ebfca2b3ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/objtool/tests/x86/test-checksum-alt.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# An alternative's replacement code counts towards the checksum of the function
+# it belongs to.
+#
+# checksum_update_insn() walks insn->alts after hashing the instruction itself:
+# the alternative's type, and where the replacement forms a group, its feature
+# number and every instruction in it. So a patch which edits only the
+# replacement -- code that runs on some CPUs and not others -- still has to
+# move the function's checksum.
+#
+# If it does not, klp diff decides the function is unchanged and leaves it out.
+# The patch then ships the old replacement, and the bug is fixed only on
+# machines whose CPU takes the other arm. Which machines those are depends on
+# the feature bit, so the failure looks like a machine-specific bug rather than
+# a missing patch.
+#
+# insn->alts exists only after objtool's check pass, so the pair goes through
+# that first -- the compiler emits none of this structure itself.
+#
+# Covers the same ground as corpus/x86_64/checksum-alt-group,
+# checksum-alt-no-group and checksum-alt-recursion-guard in Joe Lawrence's
+# klp-build unit test corpus.
+
+. "$(dirname "$0")/../lib.sh"
+
+setup
+
+check()
+{
+ build_pair checksum_alt.c "-D$1"
+ assert_input_section .altinstructions
+ run_objtool_check --mcount
+ run_checksum
+
+ assert_checksum_differs target
+}
+
+# The replacement instruction itself.
+check ALT_REPL
+# The feature number, with no instruction anywhere changed.
+check ALT_FEATURE
+
+pass "alternative replacement code counts towards the checksum"
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 18:42 [PATCH 00/58] Unit test framework for klp-build toolchain Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 01/58] objtool: Add test harness for the klp subcommands Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 02/58] objtool/klp: Check the klp test environment once, before any test Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 03/58] objtool/klp: Group the klp tests by architecture Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 04/58] objtool/klp: Classify klp test outcomes Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 05/58] objtool/klp: Build klp test fixtures through the harness Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/58] objtool/klp: Grow the klp test harness vocabulary Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 07/58] objtool/klp: Give each run one working directory, one per test inside it Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 08/58] objtool/klp: Run the klp tests under set -u Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 09/58] objtool/klp: Document the klp test harness Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 10/58] objtool: Keep failing test workdirs by default Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 11/58] objtool: Forward toolchain variables to the klp test runner Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 12/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting changed data Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 13/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced data Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 14/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced functions Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 15/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static local correlation Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 16/58] objtool/klp: Add test for cold function halves Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 17/58] objtool/klp: Add test for special section extraction Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 18/58] objtool/klp: Add test for selective " Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 19/58] objtool/klp: Add test for jump table key relocations Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 20/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symids in discarded sections Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 23/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting references to init code/data Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 24/58] objtool/klp: Add test for correlation across ThinLTO name mangling Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 25/58] objtool/klp: Add test for objects without .modinfo Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:49 ` [PATCH 26/58] objtool/klp: Add test for unchecksummed input Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 27/58] objtool/klp: Add klp diff and post-link regression tests Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 28/58] objtool/klp: Add test for klp reloc section naming in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 29/58] objtool/klp: Add test for vmlinux relocs in a patched module Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 30/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Module.symvers path normalization Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 31/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the contents of the klp_funcs list Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 32/58] objtool/klp: Add test for EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES references Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 33/58] objtool/klp: Add test for new references to exported symbols Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 34/58] objtool/klp: Add test for empty x86 alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 35/58] objtool/klp: Add test for recorded checksum values Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 36/58] objtool/klp: Add test for position-independent checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 37/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 38/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos resolved against a linked vmlinux Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 39/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static locals which must not be correlated Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 40/58] objtool/klp: Add test for __bug_table, __ex_table and __mcount_loc extraction Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 41/58] objtool/klp: Add test for kCFI prefix symbols and traps Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 42/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols whose linkage the patch changes Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 43/58] objtool/klp: Test rejection of a file-local static branch key Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 44/58] objtool/klp: Test a hand-built livepatch module's static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 45/58] objtool/klp: Test text annotations on alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 46/58] objtool/klp: Add test for data object checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 47/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols with no checksum entry of their own Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 48/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static branch introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 49/58] objtool/klp: Add test for tracepoint and pr_debug static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 50/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static call introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 51/58] objtool/klp: Add test for instruction operand checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` Song Liu [this message]
2026-09-11 19:30 ` [PATCH 52/58] objtool/klp: Add test for alternative replacement code in checksums sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 53/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the alignment of cloned data sections Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 54/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a patch which strips a data annotation Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 55/58] objtool/klp: Add test for absolute and __ADDRESSABLE symbols Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 56/58] objtool/klp: Add test for UBSAN metadata in an unchanged function Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 57/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Clang switch jump tables Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 58/58] objtool/klp: Add test for ThinLTO symbols sharing a demangled name Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 1:53 ` [PATCH 00/58] Unit test framework for klp-build toolchain Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911185031.1534046-27-song@kernel.org \
--to=song@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).