From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, puranjay@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, jikos@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting references to init code/data
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:07:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260915000712.120901F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914230355.3422996-24-song@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] objtool: test suite aborts due to fragile compiler assumptions
--
commit fa8e7a87126e5978150272fd5c3b8728c0d8f68a
Author: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting references to init code/data
Init code and data are freed once boot finishes, so a klp relocation
against them can never resolve.
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/generic/fixtures/init_reference.c b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/fixtures/init_reference.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..51b2a57dde14f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/fixtures/init_reference.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Patched function referencing data in an .init section. */
> +
> +static const char __modinfo[]
> + __attribute__((section(".modinfo"), used, aligned(1))) = "\0name=vmlinux";
> +
> +static int init_only __attribute__((section(".init.data"), used)) = 5;
[Severity: Low]
Can this static variable be constant-folded by the compiler since it lacks the
volatile qualifier and is never modified?
Modern compilers compiling at -O2 may constant-fold non-volatile static
variables or use symbol-relative relocations.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/generic/test-init-reference.sh b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/test-init-reference.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000000000..16df80a112cfd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/objtool/tests/generic/test-init-reference.sh
[ ... ]
> +# The rejection can only happen if the patched build really does reference the
> +# init symbol. Were the compiler to fold the read into a constant there would
> +# be no relocation, klp diff would succeed, and the failure below would look
> +# like a missing check rather than a fixture which stopped posing the question.
> +# The reference is relocated against the section symbol rather than against
> +# init_only, since the variable is file-local -- which is the form klp diff
> +# has to recognise anyway.
> +in_relocs "$patched_obj" | grep -qE '(^|[[:space:]])\.init\.data([[:space:]]|$|[[:space:]]*[-+])' ||
> + fail "patched object has no reference into .init.data; the fixture tests nothing"
[Severity: Low]
Does this strict check abort the test unconditionally instead of skipping it?
The check relies on a section-relative relocation and lack of constant folding.
If the compiler does constant-fold the variable or use symbol-relative
relocations, this breaks the CI/build instead of gracefully skipping via
probe_skip.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260914230355.3422996-1-song@kernel.org?part=23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 23:02 [PATCH v3 00/58] Unit test framework for klp-build toolchain Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/58] objtool: Add test harness for the klp subcommands Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 18:26 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/58] objtool/klp: Check the klp test environment once, before any test Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 03/58] objtool/klp: Group the klp tests by architecture Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 04/58] objtool/klp: Classify klp test outcomes Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 05/58] objtool/klp: Build klp test fixtures through the harness Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 19:26 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 06/58] objtool/klp: Grow the klp test harness vocabulary Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 20:30 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 07/58] objtool/klp: Give each run one working directory, one per test inside it Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 20:51 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 08/58] objtool/klp: Run the klp tests under set -u Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 09/58] objtool/klp: Document the klp test harness Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/58] objtool: Keep failing test workdirs by default Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 20:56 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/58] objtool: Forward toolchain variables to the klp test runner Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 21:04 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 12/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting changed data Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 13/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced data Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 14/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced functions Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 21:56 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 15/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static local correlation Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 16/58] objtool/klp: Add test for cold function halves Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 17/58] objtool/klp: Add test for special section extraction Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 18/58] objtool/klp: Add test for selective " Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 19/58] objtool/klp: Add test for jump table key relocations Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 20/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 21/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-15 0:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 21:51 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 22/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symids in discarded sections Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 23/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting references to init code/data Song Liu
2026-09-15 0:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-15 23:11 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 24/58] objtool/klp: Add test for correlation across ThinLTO name mangling Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 25/58] objtool/klp: Add test for objects without .modinfo Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 26/58] objtool/klp: Add test for unchecksummed input Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 27/58] objtool/klp: Add klp diff and post-link regression tests Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 28/58] objtool/klp: Add test for klp reloc section naming in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 29/58] objtool/klp: Add test for vmlinux relocs in a patched module Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 30/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Module.symvers path normalization Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 31/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the contents of the klp_funcs list Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 32/58] objtool/klp: Add test for EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES references Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 33/58] objtool/klp: Add test for new references to exported symbols Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 34/58] objtool/klp: Add test for empty x86 alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 35/58] objtool/klp: Add test for recorded checksum values Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 36/58] objtool/klp: Add test for position-independent checksums Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 37/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 38/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos resolved against a linked vmlinux Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 39/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static locals which must not be correlated Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 40/58] objtool/klp: Add test for __bug_table, __ex_table and __mcount_loc extraction Song Liu
2026-09-15 0:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 23:27 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 41/58] objtool/klp: Add test for kCFI prefix symbols and traps Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 42/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols whose linkage the patch changes Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 43/58] objtool/klp: Test rejection of a file-local static branch key Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 44/58] objtool/klp: Test a hand-built livepatch module's static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 45/58] objtool/klp: Test text annotations on alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 46/58] objtool/klp: Add test for data object checksums Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 47/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols with no checksum entry of their own Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 48/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static branch introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 49/58] objtool/klp: Add test for tracepoint and pr_debug static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-15 0:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 50/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static call introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 51/58] objtool/klp: Add test for instruction operand checksums Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 52/58] objtool/klp: Add test for alternative replacement code in checksums Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 53/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the alignment of cloned data sections Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 54/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a patch which strips a data annotation Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 55/58] objtool/klp: Add test for absolute and __ADDRESSABLE symbols Song Liu
2026-09-15 0:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 23:29 ` Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 56/58] objtool/klp: Add test for UBSAN metadata in an unchanged function Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 57/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Clang switch jump tables Song Liu
2026-09-14 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 58/58] objtool/klp: Add test for ThinLTO symbols sharing a demangled name Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260915000712.120901F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox