From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scripts/kallsyms: don't compress symbol type when CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:13:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yyq5pNA2dEcW4h6Q@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42cdce86-8ccd-3cc1-9e30-13485a183d98@huawei.com>
On Wed 2022-09-21 10:42:56, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/9/21 1:26, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2022-09-09 21:00:09, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> Currently, to search for a symbol, we need to expand the symbols in
> >> 'kallsyms_names' one by one, and then use the expanded string for
> >> comparison. This is very slow.
> >>
> >> In fact, we can first compress the name being looked up and then use
> >> it for comparison when traversing 'kallsyms_names'.
> >
> > This does not explain how this patch modifies the compressed data
> > and why it is needed.
>
> Yes, I have updated the description from the v3 version.
Ah, there is even v4. I have missed that. The commit message looks
much better there.
> So if we don't compress the symbol type, we can first compress the
> searched symbol and then make a quick comparison based on the compressed
> length and content. In this way, for entries with mismatched lengths,
> there is no need to expand and compare strings. And for those matching
> lengths, there's no need to expand the symbol. This saves a lot of time.
>
> >
> >
> >> This increases the size of 'kallsyms_names'. About 48KiB, 2.67%, on x86
> >> with defconfig.
> >> Before: kallsyms_num_syms=131392, sizeof(kallsyms_names)=1823659
> >> After : kallsyms_num_syms=131392, sizeof(kallsyms_names)=1872418
> >>
> >> However, if CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is not set, the size of 'kallsyms_names'
> >> does not change.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> scripts/kallsyms.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c
> >> index f18e6dfc68c5839..ab6fe7cd014efd1 100644
> >> --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c
> >> +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c
> >> + */
> >> + if (all_symbols)
> >> + sym_start_idx = 1;
> >
> > This looks a bit fragile. My understanding is that the new code in
> > kernel/kallsyms.c and kernel/module/kallsyms.c depends on this change.
>
> They do not depend on this change, because the index in
> insert_real_symbols_in_table() is still starting from 0. kallsyms_expand_symbol()
> shows that it uses every byte of the compressed data to look up the token table.
> The index in insert_real_symbols_in_table() starting from 0 make sure that the
> raw character of 'type' occupies a separate position in kallsyms_token_table[].
> So that kallsyms_expand_symbol() can still work well.
I guess that we are talking about different things. Anyway, please
ignore my concern about that it is fragile. The change in
scripts/kallsyms.c does not longer depend on --all-symbols parameter
in the last v4 patchset.
> > I would personally suggest to store the symbol type into a separate
> > sym->type entry in struct sym_entry and never compress it.
>
> Yes,I've also considered this, for the purpose of increasing the
> compression ratio. See below, if the sorting is performed based on
> the address and then based on the type. We can record all the symbol
> type information in less than 100 bytes. Of course, this makes the
> functions that look up symbols based on the address loop serveral
> times more. However, I would like to wait until the current patch
> series is accepted. Otherwise, I'll have to rework a lot of patches
> and it's too much work. To be honest, I've been coding for it these days.
>
> cat /proc/kallsyms | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -r
> 44678 r
> 38299 t
> 28315 T
> 11644 d
> 3768 D
> 2778 b
> 778 R
> 641 B
> 282 A
> 178 W
> 37 V
This is another optimization. I agree that we could do it later after
this patchset is accepted.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 13:00 [PATCH v2 0/8] kallsyms: Optimizes the performance of lookup symbols Zhen Lei
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] scripts/kallsyms: don't compress symbol type when CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y Zhen Lei
2022-09-20 17:26 ` Petr Mladek
2022-09-21 2:42 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-21 6:51 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-21 7:13 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] scripts/kallsyms: rename build_initial_tok_table() Zhen Lei
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] kallsyms: Adjust the types of some local variables Zhen Lei
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] kallsyms: Improve the performance of kallsyms_lookup_name() Zhen Lei
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] kallsyms: Add helper kallsyms_on_each_match_symbol() Zhen Lei
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] livepatch: Use kallsyms_on_each_match_symbol() to improve performance Zhen Lei
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] livepatch: Improve the search performance of module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol() Zhen Lei
2022-09-20 12:08 ` Petr Mladek
2022-09-20 14:01 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-21 6:56 ` Petr Mladek
2022-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] kallsyms: Add self-test facility Zhen Lei
2022-09-17 8:07 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-17 12:40 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] kallsyms: Optimizes the performance of lookup symbols Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-16 3:17 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yyq5pNA2dEcW4h6Q@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox